{"title":"重新审视了派生类型中的内存泄漏","authors":"G. Stewart","doi":"10.1145/962180.962183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a note in the Fortran Forum, Markus describes a technique for avoiding memory leaks with derived types. In this note, we show by a simple example that this technique does not work when the object in question is a parameter in nested subprogram invocations. A fix is proposed and illustrated with code from MATRAN, a Fortran 95 package for performing matrix manipulations.","PeriodicalId":379614,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory leaks in derived types revisited\",\"authors\":\"G. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/962180.962183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a note in the Fortran Forum, Markus describes a technique for avoiding memory leaks with derived types. In this note, we show by a simple example that this technique does not work when the object in question is a parameter in nested subprogram invocations. A fix is proposed and illustrated with code from MATRAN, a Fortran 95 package for performing matrix manipulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/962180.962183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/962180.962183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In a note in the Fortran Forum, Markus describes a technique for avoiding memory leaks with derived types. In this note, we show by a simple example that this technique does not work when the object in question is a parameter in nested subprogram invocations. A fix is proposed and illustrated with code from MATRAN, a Fortran 95 package for performing matrix manipulations.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
