违约损害赔偿

Daniel Benedyk, R. Keating
{"title":"违约损害赔偿","authors":"Daniel Benedyk, R. Keating","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198832805.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses the basic rule governing the assessment of damages for breach of contract, which emphasizes that no special or different rules apply to construction contracts. It explains that the basic rules have no limits to its application to the amount of loss that can be recovered. It also discusses how limits involve a set of rules which go back to the famous and ancient case of Hadley v Baxendale. This chapter describes the categories of recoverable loss, such as the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of a breach of contract. It analyses the second limb of the rule in Hadley v Baxendale that relates to special circumstances known to the parties at the time the contract was made.","PeriodicalId":296429,"journal":{"name":"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damages for Breach of Contract\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Benedyk, R. Keating\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198832805.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter analyses the basic rule governing the assessment of damages for breach of contract, which emphasizes that no special or different rules apply to construction contracts. It explains that the basic rules have no limits to its application to the amount of loss that can be recovered. It also discusses how limits involve a set of rules which go back to the famous and ancient case of Hadley v Baxendale. This chapter describes the categories of recoverable loss, such as the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of a breach of contract. It analyses the second limb of the rule in Hadley v Baxendale that relates to special circumstances known to the parties at the time the contract was made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832805.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832805.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章分析了施工合同中违约损害赔偿认定的基本规则,强调施工合同中不适用任何特殊或不同的规则。它解释说,基本规则对其适用于可以恢复的损失数额没有限制。它还讨论了限制如何涉及一套规则,这些规则可以追溯到著名而古老的哈德利诉巴克斯代尔案。本章描述了可赔偿损失的种类,如对方因违约应当获得的损害赔偿。本文分析了Hadley诉Baxendale案规则的第二部分,即合同订立时双方所知的特殊情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Damages for Breach of Contract
This chapter analyses the basic rule governing the assessment of damages for breach of contract, which emphasizes that no special or different rules apply to construction contracts. It explains that the basic rules have no limits to its application to the amount of loss that can be recovered. It also discusses how limits involve a set of rules which go back to the famous and ancient case of Hadley v Baxendale. This chapter describes the categories of recoverable loss, such as the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of a breach of contract. It analyses the second limb of the rule in Hadley v Baxendale that relates to special circumstances known to the parties at the time the contract was made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Injunctions and Specific Performance Contracts: Formation and Interpretation Damages for Breach of Contract Determination or Forfeiture Clauses International Construction Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1