集中公共采购概论

M. Comba
{"title":"集中公共采购概论","authors":"M. Comba","doi":"10.4337/9781800370418.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every year 250,000 public authorities in the EU spend around 14 per cent of GDP on the purchase of services, works and goods.1 Some of these authorities are central purchasing bodies (CPBs) who purchase goods and services for other contracting authorities, which have combined their purchasing (aggregated procurement). CPBs play a great role in some EU Member States such as, for example, Denmark, Portugal, Italy, Finland and Sweden and the tendency is gaining traction across different EU Member States. The increased use of CPBs is based on the theory that large procurement volumes generate better prices and increase competition in the market, thus affecting prices and other terms in ways that are favorable for the contracting authority and ultimately for the taxpayers.2 On top of this, the individual contracting authorities will save a significant amount of transaction costs as they do not need to conduct procurement procedures themselves as well as benefitting from the fact that CPBs are often more experienced with procurement procedures (professionalisation). Thus, particularly for contracting authorities, which do not have the capacity to conduct procurement procedures (nor the buying power) for all types of contracts, these agreements can be useful tools in purchasing. Taking the advantages of joint procurement into account, it is not surprising that the Commission also wishes to promote more joint cooperation among contracting authorities.3","PeriodicalId":253045,"journal":{"name":"Centralising Public Procurement","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Centralising Public Procurement\",\"authors\":\"M. Comba\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781800370418.00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every year 250,000 public authorities in the EU spend around 14 per cent of GDP on the purchase of services, works and goods.1 Some of these authorities are central purchasing bodies (CPBs) who purchase goods and services for other contracting authorities, which have combined their purchasing (aggregated procurement). CPBs play a great role in some EU Member States such as, for example, Denmark, Portugal, Italy, Finland and Sweden and the tendency is gaining traction across different EU Member States. The increased use of CPBs is based on the theory that large procurement volumes generate better prices and increase competition in the market, thus affecting prices and other terms in ways that are favorable for the contracting authority and ultimately for the taxpayers.2 On top of this, the individual contracting authorities will save a significant amount of transaction costs as they do not need to conduct procurement procedures themselves as well as benefitting from the fact that CPBs are often more experienced with procurement procedures (professionalisation). Thus, particularly for contracting authorities, which do not have the capacity to conduct procurement procedures (nor the buying power) for all types of contracts, these agreements can be useful tools in purchasing. Taking the advantages of joint procurement into account, it is not surprising that the Commission also wishes to promote more joint cooperation among contracting authorities.3\",\"PeriodicalId\":253045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Centralising Public Procurement\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Centralising Public Procurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370418.00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Centralising Public Procurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370418.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每年,欧盟有25万个公共机构将约14%的GDP用于购买服务、工程和商品其中一些机构是中央采购机构(CPBs),它们为其他合同机构购买货物和服务,这些机构合并了它们的采购(汇总采购)。CPBs在一些欧盟成员国发挥着重要作用,例如丹麦、葡萄牙、意大利、芬兰和瑞典,而且这种趋势正在不同的欧盟成员国中得到推动。CPBs使用的增加是基于这样一种理论,即大量采购产生更好的价格并增加市场竞争,从而以有利于合同当局并最终有利于纳税人的方式影响价格和其他条件除此之外,个别订约当局将节省大量的交易成本,因为它们不需要自己进行采购程序,并受益于CPBs通常在采购程序方面更有经验(专业化)。因此,特别是对于没有能力为所有类型的合同执行采购程序(也没有购买力)的订约当局来说,这些协定可以成为采购的有用工具。考虑到联合采购的好处,委员会也希望促进订约当局之间更多的联合合作就不足为奇了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction to Centralising Public Procurement
Every year 250,000 public authorities in the EU spend around 14 per cent of GDP on the purchase of services, works and goods.1 Some of these authorities are central purchasing bodies (CPBs) who purchase goods and services for other contracting authorities, which have combined their purchasing (aggregated procurement). CPBs play a great role in some EU Member States such as, for example, Denmark, Portugal, Italy, Finland and Sweden and the tendency is gaining traction across different EU Member States. The increased use of CPBs is based on the theory that large procurement volumes generate better prices and increase competition in the market, thus affecting prices and other terms in ways that are favorable for the contracting authority and ultimately for the taxpayers.2 On top of this, the individual contracting authorities will save a significant amount of transaction costs as they do not need to conduct procurement procedures themselves as well as benefitting from the fact that CPBs are often more experienced with procurement procedures (professionalisation). Thus, particularly for contracting authorities, which do not have the capacity to conduct procurement procedures (nor the buying power) for all types of contracts, these agreements can be useful tools in purchasing. Taking the advantages of joint procurement into account, it is not surprising that the Commission also wishes to promote more joint cooperation among contracting authorities.3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Central purchasing bodies: the case of Poland Central purchasing bodies in France Central purchasing bodies in the United Kingdom Central purchasing bodies in Sweden Central purchasing bodies in Finland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1