基于应用的区间封闭技术验证仿真探讨

Julia Kersten, A. Rauh, H. Aschemann
{"title":"基于应用的区间封闭技术验证仿真探讨","authors":"Julia Kersten, A. Rauh, H. Aschemann","doi":"10.1109/MMAR.2019.8864673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamical systems are often subject to uncertainties, whether it be parameter uncertainties or the interpretation of state dependencies in quasi-linear state-space representations as some kind of time-varying uncertain parameters. The first group of uncertainties arises from mathematical model simplifications, manufacturing tolerances, and imperfect measurements. Here, uncertainties can be represented in different forms like probability distributions in the stochastic case or interval representations in a bounded error framework. On the one hand, there exist numerous techniques to handle stochastic uncertainty, for example Monte-Carlo methods, but those do not allow for the computation of worst-case bounds of the sets of reachable states. On the other hand, approaches based on interval analysis are capable of the latter aspect. This paper deals with those methods from the perspective of an application scenario in the form of a guaranteed robust stabilization of an inverted pendulum by using constant controller gains. Here, we assume an interval representation for the bounded influence of state dependencies in the system matrices by a polytopic uncertainty model. When dealing with interval uncertainty, the rigorous computation of guaranteed state enclosures is a difficult task. Due to conservatism and/or the wrapping effect, overestimation is a common problem. This paper discusses different approaches to perform a verified reachability analysis by means of interval enclosures to be interfaced with the controller parameterization and gives guidelines on which available technique to use in a real-life robust control task.","PeriodicalId":392498,"journal":{"name":"2019 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application-Based Discussion of Verified Simulations of Interval Enclosure Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Julia Kersten, A. Rauh, H. Aschemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MMAR.2019.8864673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dynamical systems are often subject to uncertainties, whether it be parameter uncertainties or the interpretation of state dependencies in quasi-linear state-space representations as some kind of time-varying uncertain parameters. The first group of uncertainties arises from mathematical model simplifications, manufacturing tolerances, and imperfect measurements. Here, uncertainties can be represented in different forms like probability distributions in the stochastic case or interval representations in a bounded error framework. On the one hand, there exist numerous techniques to handle stochastic uncertainty, for example Monte-Carlo methods, but those do not allow for the computation of worst-case bounds of the sets of reachable states. On the other hand, approaches based on interval analysis are capable of the latter aspect. This paper deals with those methods from the perspective of an application scenario in the form of a guaranteed robust stabilization of an inverted pendulum by using constant controller gains. Here, we assume an interval representation for the bounded influence of state dependencies in the system matrices by a polytopic uncertainty model. When dealing with interval uncertainty, the rigorous computation of guaranteed state enclosures is a difficult task. Due to conservatism and/or the wrapping effect, overestimation is a common problem. This paper discusses different approaches to perform a verified reachability analysis by means of interval enclosures to be interfaced with the controller parameterization and gives guidelines on which available technique to use in a real-life robust control task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":392498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMAR.2019.8864673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMAR.2019.8864673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

动态系统经常受到不确定性的影响,无论是参数不确定性还是将准线性状态空间表示中的状态依赖解释为某种时变不确定参数。第一组不确定性来自数学模型的简化、制造公差和不完美的测量。在这里,不确定性可以以不同的形式表示,如随机情况下的概率分布或有界误差框架中的区间表示。一方面,存在许多处理随机不确定性的技术,例如蒙特卡罗方法,但这些技术不允许计算可达状态集的最坏情况边界。另一方面,基于区间分析的方法具有后一方面的能力。本文从一个应用场景的角度讨论了这些方法,即利用恒定控制器增益保证倒立摆的鲁棒镇定。在这里,我们用一个多面体不确定性模型假设系统矩阵中状态依赖的有界影响的区间表示。在处理区间不确定性时,保证状态框的严格计算是一项困难的任务。由于保守性和/或包装效应,高估是一个常见的问题。本文讨论了不同的方法来执行一个验证的可达性分析,通过间隔框接口与控制器参数化,并给出了指导方针,可用的技术,在一个现实的鲁棒控制任务中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application-Based Discussion of Verified Simulations of Interval Enclosure Techniques
Dynamical systems are often subject to uncertainties, whether it be parameter uncertainties or the interpretation of state dependencies in quasi-linear state-space representations as some kind of time-varying uncertain parameters. The first group of uncertainties arises from mathematical model simplifications, manufacturing tolerances, and imperfect measurements. Here, uncertainties can be represented in different forms like probability distributions in the stochastic case or interval representations in a bounded error framework. On the one hand, there exist numerous techniques to handle stochastic uncertainty, for example Monte-Carlo methods, but those do not allow for the computation of worst-case bounds of the sets of reachable states. On the other hand, approaches based on interval analysis are capable of the latter aspect. This paper deals with those methods from the perspective of an application scenario in the form of a guaranteed robust stabilization of an inverted pendulum by using constant controller gains. Here, we assume an interval representation for the bounded influence of state dependencies in the system matrices by a polytopic uncertainty model. When dealing with interval uncertainty, the rigorous computation of guaranteed state enclosures is a difficult task. Due to conservatism and/or the wrapping effect, overestimation is a common problem. This paper discusses different approaches to perform a verified reachability analysis by means of interval enclosures to be interfaced with the controller parameterization and gives guidelines on which available technique to use in a real-life robust control task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interval Observer-Based Controller Design for Systems with State Constraints: Application to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Stacks Process Fault Detection and Reconstruction by Principal Component Analysis Maintenance Scheduling of the Embroidery Machines Based on Fuzzy Logic Application of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Building Design - Optimisation Methods Social robot in diagnosis of autism among preschool children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1