《法律与经济学》对公共采购中的选择方式和市场优势的批判性评述

Monica Sofia Safar Diaz
{"title":"《法律与经济学》对公共采购中的选择方式和市场优势的批判性评述","authors":"Monica Sofia Safar Diaz","doi":"10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The premise of this article revolves around considering whether the procedures for choosing future public administration collaborators should be the result of plural and open process. That is, through the market. This is so that the greatest number of offers can be presented, and that it is precisely this openness that results in the indeterminacy of the number of participants that will make each one of them strive to present the best offer. Therefore, based on the incorporation of some precepts of Law & Economics, this article aims to defend a position that is understood as socially efficient.","PeriodicalId":309029,"journal":{"name":"Justicia &Derecho","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review from Law & Economics of selection modalities and market advantages in public procurement\",\"authors\":\"Monica Sofia Safar Diaz\",\"doi\":\"10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The premise of this article revolves around considering whether the procedures for choosing future public administration collaborators should be the result of plural and open process. That is, through the market. This is so that the greatest number of offers can be presented, and that it is precisely this openness that results in the indeterminacy of the number of participants that will make each one of them strive to present the best offer. Therefore, based on the incorporation of some precepts of Law & Economics, this article aims to defend a position that is understood as socially efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justicia &Derecho\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justicia &Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justicia &Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究的前提是考虑未来公共行政合作者的选择程序是否应该是多元开放过程的结果。也就是说,通过市场。这是为了尽可能多地提出建议,而正是这种开放性导致了参与者数量的不确定性,这将使他们中的每一个人都努力提出最好的建议。因此,基于法律和经济学的一些规则的结合,本文旨在捍卫一个被理解为社会效率的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critical review from Law & Economics of selection modalities and market advantages in public procurement
The premise of this article revolves around considering whether the procedures for choosing future public administration collaborators should be the result of plural and open process. That is, through the market. This is so that the greatest number of offers can be presented, and that it is precisely this openness that results in the indeterminacy of the number of participants that will make each one of them strive to present the best offer. Therefore, based on the incorporation of some precepts of Law & Economics, this article aims to defend a position that is understood as socially efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ella Reseña del libro “Derecho Internacional Público”, Jaime Tijmes, Andrés Delgado Casteleiro & Andrea Lucas (eds), Tirant Lo Blanch 2023 Análisis de desempeño microinstitucional: reflexiones sobre el uso de la tecnología. El caso del sistema de justicia (penal) colombiano La real complejidad de la labor judicial en la audiencia preparatoria: reconociendo el rol articulador de las juezas y los jueces de familia Delitos económicos y determinación de autoría. Puntos de debate y propuestas de solución en Colombia Los desafíos que enfrenta la codificación civil en el derecho español
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1