Uniswap v3中的差异流动性提供及其对合同设计的影响

Z. Fan, F. J. Cossío, B. Altschuler, He Sun, Xintong Wang, D. Parkes
{"title":"Uniswap v3中的差异流动性提供及其对合同设计的影响","authors":"Z. Fan, F. J. Cossío, B. Altschuler, He Sun, Xintong Wang, D. Parkes","doi":"10.1145/3533271.3561775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) provide a means for users to trade pairs of assets on-chain without the need of a trusted third party to effectuate a trade. Amongst these, constant function market maker (CFMM) DEXs such as Uniswap handle the most volume of trades between ERC-20 tokens. With the introduction of Uniswap v3, liquidity providers are given the option to differentially allocate liquidity to be used for trades that occur within specific price intervals. In this paper, we formalize the profit and loss that liquidity providers can earn when providing specific liquidity positions to a contract. With this in hand, we are able to compute optimal liquidity allocations for liquidity providers who hold beliefs over how prices evolve over time. Ultimately, we use this tool to shed light on the design question regarding how v3 contracts should partition price space for permissible liquidity allocations. Our results show that a richer space of potential partitions can simultaneously benefit both liquidity providers and traders.","PeriodicalId":134888,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3 and Implications for Contract Design✱\",\"authors\":\"Z. Fan, F. J. Cossío, B. Altschuler, He Sun, Xintong Wang, D. Parkes\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3533271.3561775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) provide a means for users to trade pairs of assets on-chain without the need of a trusted third party to effectuate a trade. Amongst these, constant function market maker (CFMM) DEXs such as Uniswap handle the most volume of trades between ERC-20 tokens. With the introduction of Uniswap v3, liquidity providers are given the option to differentially allocate liquidity to be used for trades that occur within specific price intervals. In this paper, we formalize the profit and loss that liquidity providers can earn when providing specific liquidity positions to a contract. With this in hand, we are able to compute optimal liquidity allocations for liquidity providers who hold beliefs over how prices evolve over time. Ultimately, we use this tool to shed light on the design question regarding how v3 contracts should partition price space for permissible liquidity allocations. Our results show that a richer space of potential partitions can simultaneously benefit both liquidity providers and traders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533271.3561775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533271.3561775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

去中心化交易所(DEXs)为用户提供了一种交易链上资产对的手段,而不需要可信的第三方来实现交易。其中,恒定功能做市商(CFMM) DEXs(如Uniswap)处理ERC-20代币之间的交易量最大。随着Uniswap v3的引入,流动性提供者可以选择为特定价格区间内发生的交易分配不同的流动性。在本文中,我们形式化了流动性提供者在为合约提供特定流动性头寸时可以获得的盈亏。有了这个,我们就能够计算出流动性提供者的最佳流动性配置,他们相信价格会随着时间的推移而变化。最后,我们使用这个工具来阐明有关v3合约应该如何为允许的流动性分配划分价格空间的设计问题。我们的研究结果表明,更丰富的潜在分区空间可以同时使流动性提供者和交易者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differential Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3 and Implications for Contract Design✱
Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) provide a means for users to trade pairs of assets on-chain without the need of a trusted third party to effectuate a trade. Amongst these, constant function market maker (CFMM) DEXs such as Uniswap handle the most volume of trades between ERC-20 tokens. With the introduction of Uniswap v3, liquidity providers are given the option to differentially allocate liquidity to be used for trades that occur within specific price intervals. In this paper, we formalize the profit and loss that liquidity providers can earn when providing specific liquidity positions to a contract. With this in hand, we are able to compute optimal liquidity allocations for liquidity providers who hold beliefs over how prices evolve over time. Ultimately, we use this tool to shed light on the design question regarding how v3 contracts should partition price space for permissible liquidity allocations. Our results show that a richer space of potential partitions can simultaneously benefit both liquidity providers and traders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Core Matrix Regression and Prediction with Regularization Risk-Aware Linear Bandits with Application in Smart Order Routing Addressing Extreme Market Responses Using Secure Aggregation Addressing Non-Stationarity in FX Trading with Online Model Selection of Offline RL Experts Objective Driven Portfolio Construction Using Reinforcement Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1