结论

Emily Steinlight
{"title":"结论","authors":"Emily Steinlight","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501710704.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the advent of modernism — anticipated in Thomas Hardy's later novels — and how it marked a pivot point in the literary politics of the population at the end of the nineteenth century. It demonstrates how the biopolitical demand to regulate human numbers remained in force at the turn of the century. Modernism, to be sure, brings markedly different aesthetic and formal techniques to bear on the phenomena of mass life. The chapter suggests what happens to the concept of population and to the novel form at the century's end: both, in effect, are psychologized. And this psychological turn, oddly enough, makes the unconscious the site of political collectivity and of species-being. Ultimately, the chapter shows that the surplus of human material generated by fiction is never merely a tragic remnant of biological existence exiled from political space and bereft of meaning. The sheer excessiveness of the novel's subjects runs over the edges of any social body, state, empire, or valorizing structure that aims to encompass the species. In so doing, it makes the possibility of resistance immanent to fiction's biopolitical imagination.","PeriodicalId":251461,"journal":{"name":"Populating the Novel","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"Emily Steinlight\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/cornell/9781501710704.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks at the advent of modernism — anticipated in Thomas Hardy's later novels — and how it marked a pivot point in the literary politics of the population at the end of the nineteenth century. It demonstrates how the biopolitical demand to regulate human numbers remained in force at the turn of the century. Modernism, to be sure, brings markedly different aesthetic and formal techniques to bear on the phenomena of mass life. The chapter suggests what happens to the concept of population and to the novel form at the century's end: both, in effect, are psychologized. And this psychological turn, oddly enough, makes the unconscious the site of political collectivity and of species-being. Ultimately, the chapter shows that the surplus of human material generated by fiction is never merely a tragic remnant of biological existence exiled from political space and bereft of meaning. The sheer excessiveness of the novel's subjects runs over the edges of any social body, state, empire, or valorizing structure that aims to encompass the species. In so doing, it makes the possibility of resistance immanent to fiction's biopolitical imagination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Populating the Novel\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Populating the Novel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501710704.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Populating the Novel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501710704.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章着眼于现代主义的到来——在托马斯·哈代后来的小说中有所预见——以及它如何成为19世纪末大众文学政治的一个转折点。它表明,在世纪之交,控制人口数量的生物政治需求如何仍然有效。当然,现代主义给大众生活现象带来了明显不同的美学和形式技巧。这一章暗示了本世纪末人口概念和小说形式的变化:实际上,两者都被心理化了。奇怪的是,这种心理转变使无意识成为政治集体和物种存在的场所。最后,本章表明,小说产生的人类物质的过剩绝不仅仅是生物存在的悲剧性残余,它被政治空间所放逐,失去了意义。小说主题的纯粹过度超越了任何旨在涵盖物种的社会团体、国家、帝国或价值结构的边缘。在这样做的过程中,它为小说的生命政治想象提供了内在的抵抗可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conclusion
This chapter looks at the advent of modernism — anticipated in Thomas Hardy's later novels — and how it marked a pivot point in the literary politics of the population at the end of the nineteenth century. It demonstrates how the biopolitical demand to regulate human numbers remained in force at the turn of the century. Modernism, to be sure, brings markedly different aesthetic and formal techniques to bear on the phenomena of mass life. The chapter suggests what happens to the concept of population and to the novel form at the century's end: both, in effect, are psychologized. And this psychological turn, oddly enough, makes the unconscious the site of political collectivity and of species-being. Ultimately, the chapter shows that the surplus of human material generated by fiction is never merely a tragic remnant of biological existence exiled from political space and bereft of meaning. The sheer excessiveness of the novel's subjects runs over the edges of any social body, state, empire, or valorizing structure that aims to encompass the species. In so doing, it makes the possibility of resistance immanent to fiction's biopolitical imagination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction. The Biopolitical Imagination Chapter 3. Dickens’s Supernumeraries Index Chapter 5. “Because We Are Too Menny” Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1