这样做是为了纪念我吗?礼仪研究中的伊伦派和埃伦派规范性

M. Barnard, M. Klomp, M. Wisse
{"title":"这样做是为了纪念我吗?礼仪研究中的伊伦派和埃伦派规范性","authors":"M. Barnard, M. Klomp, M. Wisse","doi":"10.21827/YRLS.36.71-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of this article, two liturgical scholars and a scholar in dogmatics, engaged in a public discussion of whether or not a Holy Communion should be celebrated online. Speaking about the case afterwards, they found that both the discourse of liturgical studies and of dogmatics introduced comparable normative elements. Barnard and Klomp in liturgical studies speak with Ronald Grimes of ‘ritual criticism’ and with Roy Rappaport of ‘The True Words’ as benchmarks that are established by religions in the infinite field of meanings of the rite. Wisse speaks on the basis of the originally Lutheran distinction of Law and Gospel of therapeutic or irenic and elenctic normativity. The authors advocate this distinction as an instrument that opens the way for a discussion about the mystery of life and of the sacraments.","PeriodicalId":129930,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do This in Remembrance of Me Online? Irenic and Elenctic Normativity in Liturgical Studies\",\"authors\":\"M. Barnard, M. Klomp, M. Wisse\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/YRLS.36.71-82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors of this article, two liturgical scholars and a scholar in dogmatics, engaged in a public discussion of whether or not a Holy Communion should be celebrated online. Speaking about the case afterwards, they found that both the discourse of liturgical studies and of dogmatics introduced comparable normative elements. Barnard and Klomp in liturgical studies speak with Ronald Grimes of ‘ritual criticism’ and with Roy Rappaport of ‘The True Words’ as benchmarks that are established by religions in the infinite field of meanings of the rite. Wisse speaks on the basis of the originally Lutheran distinction of Law and Gospel of therapeutic or irenic and elenctic normativity. The authors advocate this distinction as an instrument that opens the way for a discussion about the mystery of life and of the sacraments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/YRLS.36.71-82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/YRLS.36.71-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的作者是两位礼仪学者和一位教义学者,他们参与了一场关于是否应该在网上庆祝圣餐的公开讨论。后来谈到这个案例,他们发现礼仪研究和教义学的论述都引入了类似的规范元素。巴纳德和克洛姆普在礼仪研究中与罗纳德·格莱姆斯的“仪式批评”和罗伊·拉帕波特的“真实的话语”一起讨论,作为宗教在仪式意义的无限领域中建立的基准。Wisse是在最初路德教对律法和福音的区分的基础上讲的,即治疗性的,或者是圣训性的和圣训性的规范性。作者主张这种区分作为一种工具,开辟了道路,讨论生命的奥秘和圣礼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do This in Remembrance of Me Online? Irenic and Elenctic Normativity in Liturgical Studies
The authors of this article, two liturgical scholars and a scholar in dogmatics, engaged in a public discussion of whether or not a Holy Communion should be celebrated online. Speaking about the case afterwards, they found that both the discourse of liturgical studies and of dogmatics introduced comparable normative elements. Barnard and Klomp in liturgical studies speak with Ronald Grimes of ‘ritual criticism’ and with Roy Rappaport of ‘The True Words’ as benchmarks that are established by religions in the infinite field of meanings of the rite. Wisse speaks on the basis of the originally Lutheran distinction of Law and Gospel of therapeutic or irenic and elenctic normativity. The authors advocate this distinction as an instrument that opens the way for a discussion about the mystery of life and of the sacraments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genocide Commemoration and Reconciliation in Rwanda from a Liturgical Ritual Perspective Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen ‘Count your Blessings!’ The Interpretive Potential of Sacramental Theology for Everyday Ritualizations around Food Worldview Communication by Ritual Counsellors. An Explorative Multiple Case Study on Funeral Rituals Ritual Worlding. Exploring the Self-and-world-making Efficacy of Rituals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1