{"title":"管状圆柱形天线端部天线电流波反射的精确处理","authors":"E. Hallén","doi":"10.1109/TAP.1956.1144401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of the auth0r.l-3 In this equation the distance between two points on the antenna is normally represented by the distance between the corresponding points on some central line. Only when the distance is small this is not permitted and from such regions arises the only term which contains the dimension of the cross section, which is a parameter mainly consisting of a logarithm. The equation therefore has a certain limited degree of accuracy which is such that the ratio of the radius of cross section to the length of the antenna or to the wavelength is neglected compared with unity. The results which can be drawn from the linearized integral equation thus also should have this limited accuracy which is a normal one in electrotechnics in all kinds of devices, where wires are involved. Nevertheless much discussion has gone on about this accuracy. The only way of finding definite numerical answers to this question is to solve exactly the antenna integral equations, both the linearized one and the exact one, for some special case. Nowadays this can be done for a straight cylindrical tube-shaped antenna. (R. Gans has recently expressed the opinion that Hallen’s linearized integral equation should not have any exact sol~tion.~~ This is a mistake made by Gans because he apparently has never seen my original papers. What he studies and criticizes is the coarser form of the equation given in many American papers and books as “Hall6n’s integral equation.” Gans in reality criticizes the deviation that is made in those papers from my own form, which is not subject to any criticism of the kind expressed by Gans.6.7","PeriodicalId":133512,"journal":{"name":"IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1956-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exact treatment of antenna current wave reflection at the end of a tube-shaped cylindrical antenna\",\"authors\":\"E. Hallén\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAP.1956.1144401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of the auth0r.l-3 In this equation the distance between two points on the antenna is normally represented by the distance between the corresponding points on some central line. Only when the distance is small this is not permitted and from such regions arises the only term which contains the dimension of the cross section, which is a parameter mainly consisting of a logarithm. The equation therefore has a certain limited degree of accuracy which is such that the ratio of the radius of cross section to the length of the antenna or to the wavelength is neglected compared with unity. The results which can be drawn from the linearized integral equation thus also should have this limited accuracy which is a normal one in electrotechnics in all kinds of devices, where wires are involved. Nevertheless much discussion has gone on about this accuracy. The only way of finding definite numerical answers to this question is to solve exactly the antenna integral equations, both the linearized one and the exact one, for some special case. Nowadays this can be done for a straight cylindrical tube-shaped antenna. (R. Gans has recently expressed the opinion that Hallen’s linearized integral equation should not have any exact sol~tion.~~ This is a mistake made by Gans because he apparently has never seen my original papers. What he studies and criticizes is the coarser form of the equation given in many American papers and books as “Hall6n’s integral equation.” Gans in reality criticizes the deviation that is made in those papers from my own form, which is not subject to any criticism of the kind expressed by Gans.6.7\",\"PeriodicalId\":133512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1956-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1956.1144401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1956.1144401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exact treatment of antenna current wave reflection at the end of a tube-shaped cylindrical antenna
of the auth0r.l-3 In this equation the distance between two points on the antenna is normally represented by the distance between the corresponding points on some central line. Only when the distance is small this is not permitted and from such regions arises the only term which contains the dimension of the cross section, which is a parameter mainly consisting of a logarithm. The equation therefore has a certain limited degree of accuracy which is such that the ratio of the radius of cross section to the length of the antenna or to the wavelength is neglected compared with unity. The results which can be drawn from the linearized integral equation thus also should have this limited accuracy which is a normal one in electrotechnics in all kinds of devices, where wires are involved. Nevertheless much discussion has gone on about this accuracy. The only way of finding definite numerical answers to this question is to solve exactly the antenna integral equations, both the linearized one and the exact one, for some special case. Nowadays this can be done for a straight cylindrical tube-shaped antenna. (R. Gans has recently expressed the opinion that Hallen’s linearized integral equation should not have any exact sol~tion.~~ This is a mistake made by Gans because he apparently has never seen my original papers. What he studies and criticizes is the coarser form of the equation given in many American papers and books as “Hall6n’s integral equation.” Gans in reality criticizes the deviation that is made in those papers from my own form, which is not subject to any criticism of the kind expressed by Gans.6.7