利用巴塞尔协议Ii促进融资:内部信用评级的披露

G. Hertig
{"title":"利用巴塞尔协议Ii促进融资:内部信用评级的披露","authors":"G. Hertig","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.698762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancement of their risk management activities makes it profitable for major banks to rely on internal credit ratings to calculate Basel II capital requirements (IRB approach). Firms and, more generally, market participants would benefit from the disclosure of these ratings, as it would reduce their cost of capital and facilitate investment diversification. Banks, however, have no interest in making their data publicly available. This paper proposes a regulatory framework to efficiently solve this incentive issue. It first shows that there are net benefits in requiring the disclosure of internal ratings. The paper then sketches regulatory requirements that would minimize disclosure costs and interest group opposition. Banks opting for the IRB approach would have to provide their internal ratings to one of several regional entities. The latter would consolidate the data collected and giver each borrower a rating equal to the average of the ratings it gets from its lenders. The average rating would be disclosed to the public unless the borrower has opted for non-disclosure. Relying upon multiple regional entities may cause some uncertainty (a given firm may get diverging average ratings), but it would also reduce moral hazard effects and foster competition in the rating industry.","PeriodicalId":336554,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Securities Law","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Basel Ii to Facilitate Access to Finance: The Disclosure of Internal Credit Ratings\",\"authors\":\"G. Hertig\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.698762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The advancement of their risk management activities makes it profitable for major banks to rely on internal credit ratings to calculate Basel II capital requirements (IRB approach). Firms and, more generally, market participants would benefit from the disclosure of these ratings, as it would reduce their cost of capital and facilitate investment diversification. Banks, however, have no interest in making their data publicly available. This paper proposes a regulatory framework to efficiently solve this incentive issue. It first shows that there are net benefits in requiring the disclosure of internal ratings. The paper then sketches regulatory requirements that would minimize disclosure costs and interest group opposition. Banks opting for the IRB approach would have to provide their internal ratings to one of several regional entities. The latter would consolidate the data collected and giver each borrower a rating equal to the average of the ratings it gets from its lenders. The average rating would be disclosed to the public unless the borrower has opted for non-disclosure. Relying upon multiple regional entities may cause some uncertainty (a given firm may get diverging average ratings), but it would also reduce moral hazard effects and foster competition in the rating industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Securities Law\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Securities Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.698762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Securities Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.698762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

风险管理活动的进步使得主要银行依靠内部信用评级来计算巴塞尔II资本要求(IRB方法)是有利可图的。公司,更普遍地说,市场参与者将从这些评级的披露中受益,因为这将降低他们的资本成本,促进投资多样化。然而,银行没有兴趣公开他们的数据。本文提出了一个有效解决这一激励问题的监管框架。它首先表明,要求披露内部评级有净收益。然后,该报告概述了将披露成本和利益集团反对最小化的监管要求。选择内部评级委员会方法的银行将不得不向几个地区性实体之一提供其内部评级。后者将整合收集到的数据,并给予每个借款人与其从贷方获得的评级的平均值相当的评级。平均评级将向公众披露,除非借款人选择不披露。依赖多个区域实体可能会造成一些不确定性(一个给定的公司可能会得到不同的平均评级),但它也会减少道德风险效应,并促进评级行业的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Basel Ii to Facilitate Access to Finance: The Disclosure of Internal Credit Ratings
The advancement of their risk management activities makes it profitable for major banks to rely on internal credit ratings to calculate Basel II capital requirements (IRB approach). Firms and, more generally, market participants would benefit from the disclosure of these ratings, as it would reduce their cost of capital and facilitate investment diversification. Banks, however, have no interest in making their data publicly available. This paper proposes a regulatory framework to efficiently solve this incentive issue. It first shows that there are net benefits in requiring the disclosure of internal ratings. The paper then sketches regulatory requirements that would minimize disclosure costs and interest group opposition. Banks opting for the IRB approach would have to provide their internal ratings to one of several regional entities. The latter would consolidate the data collected and giver each borrower a rating equal to the average of the ratings it gets from its lenders. The average rating would be disclosed to the public unless the borrower has opted for non-disclosure. Relying upon multiple regional entities may cause some uncertainty (a given firm may get diverging average ratings), but it would also reduce moral hazard effects and foster competition in the rating industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Should a Firm Go Public? A Dynamic Model of the Choice between Fixed-Price Offerings and Auctions in Ipos and Privatizations Do we need a European 'National Market System'? Competition, Arbitrage, and Suboptimal Executions Emergency Short Selling Restrictions in the Course of the Financial Crisis Litigation Governance: Taking Accountability Seriously The SEC and the Madoff Scandal: Three Narratives in Search of a Story
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1