系统架构与集成系统可视化动态行为和品质

G. Muller, K. Falk, Elisabet Syverud
{"title":"系统架构与集成系统可视化动态行为和品质","authors":"G. Muller, K. Falk, Elisabet Syverud","doi":"10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A major responsibility of architecting and integration is ensuring that desired dynamic behavior and desired qualities emerge from the interaction of components within the systems, between systems, and between the users and environment of the systems. A challenge is that organizational attention tends to be on the parts structure, which is determining organization, logistics, manufacturing, and servicing. At the same time, many developers lack the competence to capture dynamic behavior and the way qualities emerge. This paper explores the role of Systems of Systems (SoS) architecting in relation to the impact on integration and looks at alternative ways to visualize dynamic behavior. Three different Systems of Systems, both Directed and Acknowledged SoS, are studied. The visualizations in this paper aid in conceptualizing the system of interest to a larger stakeholder community. Visualizing dynamic behavior allows us to think and reason about potential changes and improvements of Systems of Systems. We encourage use of visualizing dynamic behavior from early conceptual phase and recommend that the developed visualizations are maintained and in active use throughout the SoS life cycle.","PeriodicalId":133413,"journal":{"name":"2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systems of Systems Architecting and Integration; Visualizing Dynamic Behavior and Qualities\",\"authors\":\"G. Muller, K. Falk, Elisabet Syverud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A major responsibility of architecting and integration is ensuring that desired dynamic behavior and desired qualities emerge from the interaction of components within the systems, between systems, and between the users and environment of the systems. A challenge is that organizational attention tends to be on the parts structure, which is determining organization, logistics, manufacturing, and servicing. At the same time, many developers lack the competence to capture dynamic behavior and the way qualities emerge. This paper explores the role of Systems of Systems (SoS) architecting in relation to the impact on integration and looks at alternative ways to visualize dynamic behavior. Three different Systems of Systems, both Directed and Acknowledged SoS, are studied. The visualizations in this paper aid in conceptualizing the system of interest to a larger stakeholder community. Visualizing dynamic behavior allows us to think and reason about potential changes and improvements of Systems of Systems. We encourage use of visualizing dynamic behavior from early conceptual phase and recommend that the developed visualizations are maintained and in active use throughout the SoS life cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

架构和集成的主要职责是确保从系统内部、系统之间以及系统的用户和环境之间的组件交互中出现所需的动态行为和所需的质量。一个挑战是,组织的注意力往往集中在部件结构上,这决定了组织、物流、制造和服务。同时,许多开发人员缺乏捕捉动态行为和质量出现方式的能力。本文探讨了系统的系统(SoS)架构在集成影响方面的作用,并探讨了可视化动态行为的替代方法。研究了三种不同的“系统的系统”,包括定向系统和被承认系统。本文中的可视化有助于向更大的利益相关者社区概念化利益系统。可视化动态行为使我们能够思考和推理系统的潜在变化和改进。我们鼓励从早期概念阶段就使用可视化动态行为,并建议在整个SoS生命周期中维护和积极使用已开发的可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systems of Systems Architecting and Integration; Visualizing Dynamic Behavior and Qualities
A major responsibility of architecting and integration is ensuring that desired dynamic behavior and desired qualities emerge from the interaction of components within the systems, between systems, and between the users and environment of the systems. A challenge is that organizational attention tends to be on the parts structure, which is determining organization, logistics, manufacturing, and servicing. At the same time, many developers lack the competence to capture dynamic behavior and the way qualities emerge. This paper explores the role of Systems of Systems (SoS) architecting in relation to the impact on integration and looks at alternative ways to visualize dynamic behavior. Three different Systems of Systems, both Directed and Acknowledged SoS, are studied. The visualizations in this paper aid in conceptualizing the system of interest to a larger stakeholder community. Visualizing dynamic behavior allows us to think and reason about potential changes and improvements of Systems of Systems. We encourage use of visualizing dynamic behavior from early conceptual phase and recommend that the developed visualizations are maintained and in active use throughout the SoS life cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling Integral Risk Assessment (MOIRA): Experiments on the Dutch Railway Departure Process Development of soft computing tools and IoT for improving the performance assessment of analysers in a clinical laboratory Architectural reasoning in the conceptual phase - a case study in the oil and gas industry Data Center Investment vs. System Reliability in Power Distribution Systems Model-Based Approach to System of Systems Engineering: Reevaluating the Role of Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1