共同制定社会转型政策是现代社会恢复力的一个因素

N. Komendantova, S. Neumueller, E. Nkoana
{"title":"共同制定社会转型政策是现代社会恢复力的一个因素","authors":"N. Komendantova, S. Neumueller, E. Nkoana","doi":"10.4324/9781032003092-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International climate policy settled targets to mitigate impacts of climate change through decarbonization of various sectors of national economies, such as energy generation, mobility or housing (IPCC, 2019). Energy sector contributes a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions, therefore various goals were settled to decarbonize energy and electricity generation, even up to 100% by the year 2050. Renewable energy sources (RES) are one of the possible options to decarbonize electricity generation (Patt, 2015). RES is also considered by energy security policies as an option to satisfy energy demand with locally available energy resources and to mitigate the risks connected with volatility of energy supply from other countries (European Commission, 2014). Deployment of RES at scale will lead to societal transformation and to the transformation of energy systems, including all its parts such as energy generation, transmission and distribution. It will lead to a transition from centralized energy solutions based on large-scale fossil fuel energy generation power plants to more decentralized solutions based on diversified RES such as solar, wind, geothermal and others. Electricity transmission and distribution grids, including high direct voltage grids and smart grids, will be playing a greater role to balance RES that are in various places or to cover intermittency in energy supply and demand. This process of societal change based on the transformation of energy systems is termed “energy transition” within mainstream energy policy making processes (Sovacool, 2016). This “energy transition” is deemed a wicked process as it involves many stakeholders with their various and sometimes conflicting interests, perspectives and aims (Komendantova, 2018). Therefore, understanding the positions of various stakeholders and development of common-ground policy-oriented options is crucial (Komendantova et al., 2018). As such, the public are an important stakeholder and an end-user of services in the energy transition hence it is crucial to understand patterns of public acceptance of energy transition process. It is within this context that we should understand that the transition towards a more sustainable energy system will require not only the implementation of technological solutions but also a change in behavior of people with respect to the growing use of RES. Laypeople need to be at the Nadejda Komendantova et al. Policies on societal transformations","PeriodicalId":347054,"journal":{"name":"Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating policies on societal transformations as a factor of resilience of modern society\",\"authors\":\"N. Komendantova, S. Neumueller, E. Nkoana\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781032003092-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International climate policy settled targets to mitigate impacts of climate change through decarbonization of various sectors of national economies, such as energy generation, mobility or housing (IPCC, 2019). Energy sector contributes a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions, therefore various goals were settled to decarbonize energy and electricity generation, even up to 100% by the year 2050. Renewable energy sources (RES) are one of the possible options to decarbonize electricity generation (Patt, 2015). RES is also considered by energy security policies as an option to satisfy energy demand with locally available energy resources and to mitigate the risks connected with volatility of energy supply from other countries (European Commission, 2014). Deployment of RES at scale will lead to societal transformation and to the transformation of energy systems, including all its parts such as energy generation, transmission and distribution. It will lead to a transition from centralized energy solutions based on large-scale fossil fuel energy generation power plants to more decentralized solutions based on diversified RES such as solar, wind, geothermal and others. Electricity transmission and distribution grids, including high direct voltage grids and smart grids, will be playing a greater role to balance RES that are in various places or to cover intermittency in energy supply and demand. This process of societal change based on the transformation of energy systems is termed “energy transition” within mainstream energy policy making processes (Sovacool, 2016). This “energy transition” is deemed a wicked process as it involves many stakeholders with their various and sometimes conflicting interests, perspectives and aims (Komendantova, 2018). Therefore, understanding the positions of various stakeholders and development of common-ground policy-oriented options is crucial (Komendantova et al., 2018). As such, the public are an important stakeholder and an end-user of services in the energy transition hence it is crucial to understand patterns of public acceptance of energy transition process. It is within this context that we should understand that the transition towards a more sustainable energy system will require not only the implementation of technological solutions but also a change in behavior of people with respect to the growing use of RES. Laypeople need to be at the Nadejda Komendantova et al. Policies on societal transformations\",\"PeriodicalId\":347054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032003092-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032003092-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际气候政策确定了通过能源生产、交通或住房等国民经济各个部门的脱碳来减轻气候变化影响的目标(IPCC, 2019)。能源部门贡献了温室气体排放的很大一部分,因此制定了各种目标,以使能源和发电脱碳,甚至到2050年达到100%。可再生能源(RES)是脱碳发电的可能选择之一(Patt, 2015)。可再生能源也被能源安全政策视为满足当地能源需求的一种选择,并减轻与其他国家能源供应波动相关的风险(欧盟委员会,2014年)。大规模部署可再生能源将导致社会转型和能源系统的转型,包括能源生产、传输和分配等所有部分。它将导致从基于大型化石燃料发电厂的集中式能源解决方案向基于多样化可再生能源(如太阳能、风能、地热等)的更分散的解决方案的过渡。输配电网,包括高压电网和智能电网,将在平衡各地可再生能源或覆盖能源供需间歇性方面发挥更大作用。在主流能源政策制定过程中,这种基于能源系统转型的社会变革过程被称为“能源转型”(Sovacool, 2016)。这种“能源转型”被认为是一个邪恶的过程,因为它涉及到许多利益相关者,他们的利益、观点和目标各不相同,有时甚至相互冲突(Komendantova, 2018)。因此,了解各利益相关者的立场和制定共同的政策导向选择是至关重要的(Komendantova et al., 2018)。因此,公众是能源转型中重要的利益相关者和服务的最终用户,因此了解公众对能源转型过程的接受模式至关重要。正是在这种背景下,我们应该明白,向更可持续的能源系统过渡,不仅需要实施技术解决方案,还需要改变人们对日益增长的可再生能源使用的行为。外行人需要在Nadejda Komendantova等人那里。社会转型政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-creating policies on societal transformations as a factor of resilience of modern society
International climate policy settled targets to mitigate impacts of climate change through decarbonization of various sectors of national economies, such as energy generation, mobility or housing (IPCC, 2019). Energy sector contributes a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions, therefore various goals were settled to decarbonize energy and electricity generation, even up to 100% by the year 2050. Renewable energy sources (RES) are one of the possible options to decarbonize electricity generation (Patt, 2015). RES is also considered by energy security policies as an option to satisfy energy demand with locally available energy resources and to mitigate the risks connected with volatility of energy supply from other countries (European Commission, 2014). Deployment of RES at scale will lead to societal transformation and to the transformation of energy systems, including all its parts such as energy generation, transmission and distribution. It will lead to a transition from centralized energy solutions based on large-scale fossil fuel energy generation power plants to more decentralized solutions based on diversified RES such as solar, wind, geothermal and others. Electricity transmission and distribution grids, including high direct voltage grids and smart grids, will be playing a greater role to balance RES that are in various places or to cover intermittency in energy supply and demand. This process of societal change based on the transformation of energy systems is termed “energy transition” within mainstream energy policy making processes (Sovacool, 2016). This “energy transition” is deemed a wicked process as it involves many stakeholders with their various and sometimes conflicting interests, perspectives and aims (Komendantova, 2018). Therefore, understanding the positions of various stakeholders and development of common-ground policy-oriented options is crucial (Komendantova et al., 2018). As such, the public are an important stakeholder and an end-user of services in the energy transition hence it is crucial to understand patterns of public acceptance of energy transition process. It is within this context that we should understand that the transition towards a more sustainable energy system will require not only the implementation of technological solutions but also a change in behavior of people with respect to the growing use of RES. Laypeople need to be at the Nadejda Komendantova et al. Policies on societal transformations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The power of the grassroots A mixed methods engaged study of divergent imaginaries in Bergen's mobility transition Actor roles and practices in energy transitions Energy transition in the Baltic Sea Region Engaging the public for citizen energy production in Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1