加密资产市场存在价值溢价吗?

Luca J. Liebi
{"title":"加密资产市场存在价值溢价吗?","authors":"Luca J. Liebi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3718684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigating a collection of 652 cryptoassets, I find that cryptoasset returns increase with increasing active addresses to network value ratio, a proxy for the value anomaly. Cryptoassets with a high active address to network value ratio yield on average 2.1 percentage points higher weekly returns compared to cryptoassets with low active addresses to network value ratio, and comparable size. Fama-Macbeth regressions indicate that the active addresses to network value ratio, combined with size, and momentum capture the cross-sectional variation of cryptoasset returns. Adding the value factor to existing factor models helps to explain average cryptoasset returns.","PeriodicalId":319022,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks eJournal","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There a Value Premium in Cryptoasset Markets?\",\"authors\":\"Luca J. Liebi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3718684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investigating a collection of 652 cryptoassets, I find that cryptoasset returns increase with increasing active addresses to network value ratio, a proxy for the value anomaly. Cryptoassets with a high active address to network value ratio yield on average 2.1 percentage points higher weekly returns compared to cryptoassets with low active addresses to network value ratio, and comparable size. Fama-Macbeth regressions indicate that the active addresses to network value ratio, combined with size, and momentum capture the cross-sectional variation of cryptoasset returns. Adding the value factor to existing factor models helps to explain average cryptoasset returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

调查了652个加密资产的集合,我发现加密资产的回报随着活跃地址与网络价值比率的增加而增加,这是价值异常的代理。与具有低活跃地址与网络价值比的加密资产相比,具有高活跃地址与网络价值比的加密资产平均每周回报率高出2.1个百分点,并且规模相当。Fama-Macbeth回归表明,活跃地址与网络价值之比,结合规模和动量,捕获了加密资产回报的横截面变化。将价值因素添加到现有的因素模型中有助于解释加密资产的平均回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is There a Value Premium in Cryptoasset Markets?
Investigating a collection of 652 cryptoassets, I find that cryptoasset returns increase with increasing active addresses to network value ratio, a proxy for the value anomaly. Cryptoassets with a high active address to network value ratio yield on average 2.1 percentage points higher weekly returns compared to cryptoassets with low active addresses to network value ratio, and comparable size. Fama-Macbeth regressions indicate that the active addresses to network value ratio, combined with size, and momentum capture the cross-sectional variation of cryptoasset returns. Adding the value factor to existing factor models helps to explain average cryptoasset returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education-Occupation Mismatch and Social Networks for Hispanics in the US: Role of Citizenship Monitoring Network Changes in Social Media Platform Liability and Innovation The Bipartisan Case for Labeling as a Content Moderation Method: Findings from a National Survey Dealer Networks and the Cost of Immediacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1