培育濒危物种:教师发展的建设性方法

L. L. Schwartz
{"title":"培育濒危物种:教师发展的建设性方法","authors":"L. L. Schwartz","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrenchment. Tenure. Burn-out. MBO. Budget cuts. Competencies. Like the Egyptians f old, col lege faculty members find themselves beset by plagues. And like Prince Hamlet, they are confronted with a choice: to be part of the faculty or not to be. Resigna tion provides faculty with one decisive solution. If they choose to continue, however, do they stay on the same old path? Do they move into administration? Or do they expand and become more effective as teachers and pro fessionals? If faculty choose the last option, the central question becomes: In what ways can faculty develop? Related problems of individual initiative, financial and moral support from administration, existing or new-found in terests, available opportunities, and factors of time and money complicate the issue of faculty growth and creativity. Ideally, faculty should respond to these prob lems in ways that will make them assets to the institu tion, too valuable to be lost and too enthusiastic to cease their renewed efforts. The goal is clear, but it is necessary now to find means to achieve it. There are some difficulties in needs between tenured and untenured faculty, and between those eligible for promotion and those at the top of the professorial lad der. In the case of the untenured and \"eligibles,\" tenure and promotion criteria usually include *'evidence of continuing professional development.\" Tenured full","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurturing an Endangered Species: A Constructive Approach to Faculty Development\",\"authors\":\"L. L. Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Retrenchment. Tenure. Burn-out. MBO. Budget cuts. Competencies. Like the Egyptians f old, col lege faculty members find themselves beset by plagues. And like Prince Hamlet, they are confronted with a choice: to be part of the faculty or not to be. Resigna tion provides faculty with one decisive solution. If they choose to continue, however, do they stay on the same old path? Do they move into administration? Or do they expand and become more effective as teachers and pro fessionals? If faculty choose the last option, the central question becomes: In what ways can faculty develop? Related problems of individual initiative, financial and moral support from administration, existing or new-found in terests, available opportunities, and factors of time and money complicate the issue of faculty growth and creativity. Ideally, faculty should respond to these prob lems in ways that will make them assets to the institu tion, too valuable to be lost and too enthusiastic to cease their renewed efforts. The goal is clear, but it is necessary now to find means to achieve it. There are some difficulties in needs between tenured and untenured faculty, and between those eligible for promotion and those at the top of the professorial lad der. In the case of the untenured and \\\"eligibles,\\\" tenure and promotion criteria usually include *'evidence of continuing professional development.\\\" Tenured full\",\"PeriodicalId\":126898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

紧缩。任期。输家。MBO。削减预算。能力。就像埃及人说的那样,大学教师发现自己被瘟疫所困扰。就像哈姆雷特王子一样,他们面临着一个选择:是成为学院的一员,还是不成为。辞职为教师提供了一个决定性的解决方案。然而,如果他们选择继续下去,他们还会走老路吗?他们会进入行政部门吗?或者,他们是否会扩展并成为更有效的教师和专业人士?如果教师选择了最后一个选项,那么核心问题就变成了:教师能以何种方式发展?个人主动性、来自行政部门的财政和道德支持、现有的或新发现的利益、可用的机会以及时间和金钱因素等相关问题使教师成长和创造力的问题复杂化。理想情况下,教师应对这些问题的方式应该使他们成为学校的资产,有价值而不能失去,热情而不能停止他们的新努力。目标是明确的,但现在必须找到实现这一目标的手段。在终身教职员工和非终身教职员工之间,在有资格晋升的教职员工和处于教授阶层顶端的教职员工之间,存在着一些需求上的困难。在未获得终身教职和“符合条件”的情况下,终身教职和晋升标准通常包括“持续专业发展的证据”。终身全
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurturing an Endangered Species: A Constructive Approach to Faculty Development
Retrenchment. Tenure. Burn-out. MBO. Budget cuts. Competencies. Like the Egyptians f old, col lege faculty members find themselves beset by plagues. And like Prince Hamlet, they are confronted with a choice: to be part of the faculty or not to be. Resigna tion provides faculty with one decisive solution. If they choose to continue, however, do they stay on the same old path? Do they move into administration? Or do they expand and become more effective as teachers and pro fessionals? If faculty choose the last option, the central question becomes: In what ways can faculty develop? Related problems of individual initiative, financial and moral support from administration, existing or new-found in terests, available opportunities, and factors of time and money complicate the issue of faculty growth and creativity. Ideally, faculty should respond to these prob lems in ways that will make them assets to the institu tion, too valuable to be lost and too enthusiastic to cease their renewed efforts. The goal is clear, but it is necessary now to find means to achieve it. There are some difficulties in needs between tenured and untenured faculty, and between those eligible for promotion and those at the top of the professorial lad der. In the case of the untenured and "eligibles," tenure and promotion criteria usually include *'evidence of continuing professional development." Tenured full
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accommodating the Remedial Student in the Content Class Teaching Political Theory: Meaning through Metaphor Responding to Students: Ughs, Awks, and Ahas Responding to Industry: Writing in a High Tech World. Promoting Professional and Personal Renewal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1