面向故障检测、隔离和恢复功能的组合测试经验

Naoko Okubo, Shoma Takatsuki, Yasushi Ueda
{"title":"面向故障检测、隔离和恢复功能的组合测试经验","authors":"Naoko Okubo, Shoma Takatsuki, Yasushi Ueda","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The functionality of Fault Detection, Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR) is a key factor in achieving the high reliability of space systems. The test suites for the FDIR functionality in JAXA’s space systems are manually designed by expert engineers with decades of experience to achieve as high combination coverage with a small test suite as possible. However, there are only a few engineers who can perform such ad-hoc test suite design. Therefore, FDIR functionality testing requires a supportive method to generate a test suite with the high combination coverage with the smallest size that can be executed in the development timescale. In this paper, we describe our experience in applying popular combinatorial testing techniques to generate the real-world earth-observation satellite’s FDIR functionality test suites and comparing them with conventional human-derived test suite. The purpose of this comparison is to check the capability of the existing combinatorial testing methods toward FDIR functionality testing. Here, the FDIR functionality testing were treated as combinatorial configuration testing. As a result, we found that the 2-way coverage rate by the human, PICT, ACTS and the HAYST method were 72.7%, 66.3%, 68.8% and 72.2% with 16, 10, 10 and 14 test cases, respectively.","PeriodicalId":147133,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of Combinatorial Testing toward Fault Detection, Isolation and Recovery Functionality\",\"authors\":\"Naoko Okubo, Shoma Takatsuki, Yasushi Ueda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The functionality of Fault Detection, Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR) is a key factor in achieving the high reliability of space systems. The test suites for the FDIR functionality in JAXA’s space systems are manually designed by expert engineers with decades of experience to achieve as high combination coverage with a small test suite as possible. However, there are only a few engineers who can perform such ad-hoc test suite design. Therefore, FDIR functionality testing requires a supportive method to generate a test suite with the high combination coverage with the smallest size that can be executed in the development timescale. In this paper, we describe our experience in applying popular combinatorial testing techniques to generate the real-world earth-observation satellite’s FDIR functionality test suites and comparing them with conventional human-derived test suite. The purpose of this comparison is to check the capability of the existing combinatorial testing methods toward FDIR functionality testing. Here, the FDIR functionality testing were treated as combinatorial configuration testing. As a result, we found that the 2-way coverage rate by the human, PICT, ACTS and the HAYST method were 72.7%, 66.3%, 68.8% and 72.2% with 16, 10, 10 and 14 test cases, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

故障检测、隔离和恢复(FDIR)功能是实现空间系统高可靠性的关键因素。JAXA空间系统中FDIR功能的测试套件是由具有数十年经验的专家工程师手动设计的,以便在一个小测试套件中实现尽可能高的组合覆盖率。然而,只有少数工程师能够执行这种特别的测试套件设计。因此,FDIR功能测试需要一种支持性的方法来生成具有高组合覆盖率的测试套件,并且可以在开发时间尺度中执行最小的规模。在本文中,我们描述了我们应用流行的组合测试技术来生成真实地球观测卫星的FDIR功能测试套件的经验,并将其与传统的人类衍生测试套件进行了比较。这种比较的目的是检查现有的组合测试方法对FDIR功能测试的能力。在这里,FDIR功能测试被视为组合配置测试。结果发现,human、PICT、ACTS和HAYST方法的双向覆盖率分别为72.7%、66.3%、68.8%和72.2%,分别为16例、10例、10例和14例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experience of Combinatorial Testing toward Fault Detection, Isolation and Recovery Functionality
The functionality of Fault Detection, Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR) is a key factor in achieving the high reliability of space systems. The test suites for the FDIR functionality in JAXA’s space systems are manually designed by expert engineers with decades of experience to achieve as high combination coverage with a small test suite as possible. However, there are only a few engineers who can perform such ad-hoc test suite design. Therefore, FDIR functionality testing requires a supportive method to generate a test suite with the high combination coverage with the smallest size that can be executed in the development timescale. In this paper, we describe our experience in applying popular combinatorial testing techniques to generate the real-world earth-observation satellite’s FDIR functionality test suites and comparing them with conventional human-derived test suite. The purpose of this comparison is to check the capability of the existing combinatorial testing methods toward FDIR functionality testing. Here, the FDIR functionality testing were treated as combinatorial configuration testing. As a result, we found that the 2-way coverage rate by the human, PICT, ACTS and the HAYST method were 72.7%, 66.3%, 68.8% and 72.2% with 16, 10, 10 and 14 test cases, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Study on Generating Well-Formed Q# Quantum Programs for Fuzz Testing Security Testing as part of Software Quality Assurance: Principles and Challenges Software Bug Prediction Model Based on Mathematical Graph Features Metrics New Ranking Formulas to Improve Spectrum Based Fault Localization Via Systematic Search Software Architecture Elements Applied to Software Test: View, Viewpoints and Containers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1