关于内容部分复制的Web集群的可靠性

José Daniel García Sánchez, J. Carretero, Javier Fernández, Félix García, D. E. Singh, A. Calderón
{"title":"关于内容部分复制的Web集群的可靠性","authors":"José Daniel García Sánchez, J. Carretero, Javier Fernández, Félix García, D. E. Singh, A. Calderón","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2006.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, distributed Web servers have used two strategies for allocating files on server nodes: full replication and full distribution. While full replication provides a highly reliable solution, it limits storage capacity to the capacity of the smallest node. On the other hand, full distribution provides higher storage capacity at the cost of lower reliability. A hybrid solution is partial replication where every file is allocated to a small number of nodes. The most promising architecture for a partial replication strategy is the Web cluster architecture. However, Web clusters present a big flaw from reliability perspective as they contain a single point of failure. To correct this flaw, in this paper we present a modified architecture: the Web cluster with distributed Web switch. Reliability of Web clusters is evaluated for different replication strategies. System evaluations show that our proposal leads to a highly reliable solution with high scalability.","PeriodicalId":106780,"journal":{"name":"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the reliability of Web clusters with partial replication of contents\",\"authors\":\"José Daniel García Sánchez, J. Carretero, Javier Fernández, Félix García, D. E. Singh, A. Calderón\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2006.90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, distributed Web servers have used two strategies for allocating files on server nodes: full replication and full distribution. While full replication provides a highly reliable solution, it limits storage capacity to the capacity of the smallest node. On the other hand, full distribution provides higher storage capacity at the cost of lower reliability. A hybrid solution is partial replication where every file is allocated to a small number of nodes. The most promising architecture for a partial replication strategy is the Web cluster architecture. However, Web clusters present a big flaw from reliability perspective as they contain a single point of failure. To correct this flaw, in this paper we present a modified architecture: the Web cluster with distributed Web switch. Reliability of Web clusters is evaluated for different replication strategies. System evaluations show that our proposal leads to a highly reliable solution with high scalability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2006.90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2006.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

传统上,分布式Web服务器使用两种策略在服务器节点上分配文件:完全复制和完全分发。虽然完全复制提供了高可靠性的解决方案,但它将存储容量限制为最小节点的容量。另一方面,全分布以较低的可靠性为代价提供了较高的存储容量。混合解决方案是部分复制,其中将每个文件分配给少量节点。对于部分复制策略来说,最有前途的体系结构是Web集群体系结构。然而,从可靠性的角度来看,Web集群存在一个很大的缺陷,因为它们包含单点故障。为了纠正这一缺陷,本文提出了一种改进的架构:带有分布式Web交换机的Web集群。对不同复制策略下Web集群的可靠性进行了评估。系统评估表明,我们的方案具有高可靠性和高可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the reliability of Web clusters with partial replication of contents
Traditionally, distributed Web servers have used two strategies for allocating files on server nodes: full replication and full distribution. While full replication provides a highly reliable solution, it limits storage capacity to the capacity of the smallest node. On the other hand, full distribution provides higher storage capacity at the cost of lower reliability. A hybrid solution is partial replication where every file is allocated to a small number of nodes. The most promising architecture for a partial replication strategy is the Web cluster architecture. However, Web clusters present a big flaw from reliability perspective as they contain a single point of failure. To correct this flaw, in this paper we present a modified architecture: the Web cluster with distributed Web switch. Reliability of Web clusters is evaluated for different replication strategies. System evaluations show that our proposal leads to a highly reliable solution with high scalability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inter-domains security management (IDSM) model for IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) Securing DNS services through system self cleansing and hardware enhancements No risk is unsafe: simulated results on dependability of complementary currencies Quality of password management policy Recovery mechanism of cooperative process chain in grid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1