{"title":"软件维护的设计原理","authors":"J. Burge, David C. Brown","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2001.989846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a number of years, members of the artificial intelligence (AI) in design community have studied design rationale (DR), the reasons behind decisions made while designing. A record of what decisions were made, and why, is especially valuable for software maintenance. One reason for this is that the software lifecycle is a long one. Large projects may take years to complete and spend even more time out in the field being used (and maintained). The combination of a long lifecycle and the typically high personnel turnover in the software industry increases the probability that the original designer is unlikely to be available for consultation when problems arise. J. Lee's survey (1997) presents an excellent overview of DR research. There has also been work specific to software design, such as Boehm's WinWin (1994).","PeriodicalId":433615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design rationale for software maintenance\",\"authors\":\"J. Burge, David C. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2001.989846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a number of years, members of the artificial intelligence (AI) in design community have studied design rationale (DR), the reasons behind decisions made while designing. A record of what decisions were made, and why, is especially valuable for software maintenance. One reason for this is that the software lifecycle is a long one. Large projects may take years to complete and spend even more time out in the field being used (and maintained). The combination of a long lifecycle and the typically high personnel turnover in the software industry increases the probability that the original designer is unlikely to be available for consultation when problems arise. J. Lee's survey (1997) presents an excellent overview of DR research. There has also been work specific to software design, such as Boehm's WinWin (1994).\",\"PeriodicalId\":433615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

多年来,设计界的人工智能(AI)成员一直在研究设计原理(DR),即设计决策背后的原因。对于软件维护来说,做出哪些决策以及为什么做出决策的记录是特别有价值的。其中一个原因是软件生命周期很长。大型项目可能需要数年才能完成,并且在使用(和维护)的领域花费更多的时间。在软件行业中,长生命周期和典型的高人员流动率的结合增加了当问题出现时,原始设计师不太可能被咨询的可能性。J. Lee的调查(1997)对DR研究进行了极好的概述。也有专门针对软件设计的工作,如Boehm的win(1994)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design rationale for software maintenance
For a number of years, members of the artificial intelligence (AI) in design community have studied design rationale (DR), the reasons behind decisions made while designing. A record of what decisions were made, and why, is especially valuable for software maintenance. One reason for this is that the software lifecycle is a long one. Large projects may take years to complete and spend even more time out in the field being used (and maintained). The combination of a long lifecycle and the typically high personnel turnover in the software industry increases the probability that the original designer is unlikely to be available for consultation when problems arise. J. Lee's survey (1997) presents an excellent overview of DR research. There has also been work specific to software design, such as Boehm's WinWin (1994).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic verification of Java design patterns Program execution based module cohesion measurement Test purposes: adapting the notion of specification to testing Composition and refinement of behavioral specifications Generation of distributed system test-beds from high-level software architecture descriptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1