{"title":"健康沟通评估清单:基于网络的健康资源评估与比较","authors":"J. Genova, J. Bender","doi":"10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thereisnocomprehensiveandstandardizedtoolforevaluatingthecommunicationqualityofweb resourcesforpatients.Thepurposeofthisstudywastoassessprostatecancerwebsitesusingthe CommunicationAssessmenTChecklistinHealth(CATCH)andtocomparetheresultswiththoseof theConsumerandPatientHealthInformationSectionoftheMLA(CAPHIS).CATCHisatheorybasedtoolconsistingof50elementsnestedin12concepts.Tworatersindependentlyapplieditto35 HONcertifiedwebsitescontaininginformationonprostatecancertreatment.TheCATCHsummary scoresforthesewebsiteswerethencomparedtothe2015listofcrediblehealthwebsitespublished byCAPHIS.Websitescontainedamean24.1(SD=3.6)CATCHitems.TheconceptsLanguage, Readability,Layout,TypographyandAppearancewerepresentinover80%ofsites.Content,Risk Communication,Usefulness,andScientificValuewerepresentin50%orless.CATCHprovided anoverallscoreoftheselectedsitesthatwasconsistentwithCAPHISratings.Theprostatecancer websitesevaluatedinthisstudydidnotpresenttreatmentinformationinauseful, informativeor crediblewayforpatients.Thecommunicationqualityoftheseresourcescouldbeimprovedwitha clearstrategicintentfocusedondecision-making,usingCATCHasaguidingframework.CATCH isatoolthatcanbeusedindependentlyorwithotherhealthresourceevaluationtoolstoselectthe mosttrustworthywebresourcesforhealthinformation. KeyWoRDS CAPHIS, Communication, Credibility, Internet, MLA, Patient Education, Prostate Cancer, Risk Communication, Websites","PeriodicalId":211533,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health: Assessment and Comparison of Web-Based Health Resources\",\"authors\":\"J. Genova, J. Bender\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thereisnocomprehensiveandstandardizedtoolforevaluatingthecommunicationqualityofweb resourcesforpatients.Thepurposeofthisstudywastoassessprostatecancerwebsitesusingthe CommunicationAssessmenTChecklistinHealth(CATCH)andtocomparetheresultswiththoseof theConsumerandPatientHealthInformationSectionoftheMLA(CAPHIS).CATCHisatheorybasedtoolconsistingof50elementsnestedin12concepts.Tworatersindependentlyapplieditto35 HONcertifiedwebsitescontaininginformationonprostatecancertreatment.TheCATCHsummary scoresforthesewebsiteswerethencomparedtothe2015listofcrediblehealthwebsitespublished byCAPHIS.Websitescontainedamean24.1(SD=3.6)CATCHitems.TheconceptsLanguage, Readability,Layout,TypographyandAppearancewerepresentinover80%ofsites.Content,Risk Communication,Usefulness,andScientificValuewerepresentin50%orless.CATCHprovided anoverallscoreoftheselectedsitesthatwasconsistentwithCAPHISratings.Theprostatecancer websitesevaluatedinthisstudydidnotpresenttreatmentinformationinauseful, informativeor crediblewayforpatients.Thecommunicationqualityoftheseresourcescouldbeimprovedwitha clearstrategicintentfocusedondecision-making,usingCATCHasaguidingframework.CATCH isatoolthatcanbeusedindependentlyorwithotherhealthresourceevaluationtoolstoselectthe mosttrustworthywebresourcesforhealthinformation. KeyWoRDS CAPHIS, Communication, Credibility, Internet, MLA, Patient Education, Prostate Cancer, Risk Communication, Websites\",\"PeriodicalId\":211533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health: Assessment and Comparison of Web-Based Health Resources
Thereisnocomprehensiveandstandardizedtoolforevaluatingthecommunicationqualityofweb resourcesforpatients.Thepurposeofthisstudywastoassessprostatecancerwebsitesusingthe CommunicationAssessmenTChecklistinHealth(CATCH)andtocomparetheresultswiththoseof theConsumerandPatientHealthInformationSectionoftheMLA(CAPHIS).CATCHisatheorybasedtoolconsistingof50elementsnestedin12concepts.Tworatersindependentlyapplieditto35 HONcertifiedwebsitescontaininginformationonprostatecancertreatment.TheCATCHsummary scoresforthesewebsiteswerethencomparedtothe2015listofcrediblehealthwebsitespublished byCAPHIS.Websitescontainedamean24.1(SD=3.6)CATCHitems.TheconceptsLanguage, Readability,Layout,TypographyandAppearancewerepresentinover80%ofsites.Content,Risk Communication,Usefulness,andScientificValuewerepresentin50%orless.CATCHprovided anoverallscoreoftheselectedsitesthatwasconsistentwithCAPHISratings.Theprostatecancer websitesevaluatedinthisstudydidnotpresenttreatmentinformationinauseful, informativeor crediblewayforpatients.Thecommunicationqualityoftheseresourcescouldbeimprovedwitha clearstrategicintentfocusedondecision-making,usingCATCHasaguidingframework.CATCH isatoolthatcanbeusedindependentlyorwithotherhealthresourceevaluationtoolstoselectthe mosttrustworthywebresourcesforhealthinformation. KeyWoRDS CAPHIS, Communication, Credibility, Internet, MLA, Patient Education, Prostate Cancer, Risk Communication, Websites