Facebook拥有它:社交网络时代社会认知的不可抗拒的暴力

T. Bertolotti
{"title":"Facebook拥有它:社交网络时代社会认知的不可抗拒的暴力","authors":"T. Bertolotti","doi":"10.4018/jte.2011100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past years, mass media increasingly identified many aspects of social networking with those of established social practices such as gossip. This produced two main outcomes: on the one hand, social networks users were described as gossipers mainly aiming at invading their friends' and acquaintances' privacy; on the other hand the potentially violent consequences of social networking were legitimated by referring to a series of recent studies stressing the importance of gossip for the social evolution of human beings. This paper explores the differences between the two kinds of gossip-related sociability, the traditional one and the technologically structured one where the social framework coincides with the technological one, as in social networking websites. The aim of this reflection is to add to the critical knowledge available today about the effects that transparent technologies have on everyday life, especially as far as the social implications are concerned, in order to prevent or contrast those \"ignorance bubbles\" whose outcomes can be already dramatic.","PeriodicalId":287069,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Technoethics","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facebook Has It: The Irresistible Violence of Social Cognition in the Age of Social Networking\",\"authors\":\"T. Bertolotti\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/jte.2011100105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past years, mass media increasingly identified many aspects of social networking with those of established social practices such as gossip. This produced two main outcomes: on the one hand, social networks users were described as gossipers mainly aiming at invading their friends' and acquaintances' privacy; on the other hand the potentially violent consequences of social networking were legitimated by referring to a series of recent studies stressing the importance of gossip for the social evolution of human beings. This paper explores the differences between the two kinds of gossip-related sociability, the traditional one and the technologically structured one where the social framework coincides with the technological one, as in social networking websites. The aim of this reflection is to add to the critical knowledge available today about the effects that transparent technologies have on everyday life, especially as far as the social implications are concerned, in order to prevent or contrast those \\\"ignorance bubbles\\\" whose outcomes can be already dramatic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Technoethics\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Technoethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2011100105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Technoethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2011100105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

在过去的几年里,大众媒体越来越多地将社交网络的许多方面与那些既定的社会实践(如八卦)联系起来。这产生了两个主要结果:一方面,社交网络用户被描述为八卦者,主要目的是侵犯他们的朋友和熟人的隐私;另一方面,最近一系列强调八卦对人类社会进化重要性的研究表明,社交网络潜在的暴力后果是合理的。本文探讨了两种与八卦相关的社交活动之间的差异,即传统的社交活动和技术结构化的社交活动,其中社交框架与技术框架一致,如社交网站。这一反思的目的是增加目前可用的关于透明技术对日常生活的影响的关键知识,特别是就社会影响而言,以防止或对比那些结果可能已经非常戏剧性的“无知泡沫”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook Has It: The Irresistible Violence of Social Cognition in the Age of Social Networking
Over the past years, mass media increasingly identified many aspects of social networking with those of established social practices such as gossip. This produced two main outcomes: on the one hand, social networks users were described as gossipers mainly aiming at invading their friends' and acquaintances' privacy; on the other hand the potentially violent consequences of social networking were legitimated by referring to a series of recent studies stressing the importance of gossip for the social evolution of human beings. This paper explores the differences between the two kinds of gossip-related sociability, the traditional one and the technologically structured one where the social framework coincides with the technological one, as in social networking websites. The aim of this reflection is to add to the critical knowledge available today about the effects that transparent technologies have on everyday life, especially as far as the social implications are concerned, in order to prevent or contrast those "ignorance bubbles" whose outcomes can be already dramatic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The State of Ethical AI in Practice: A Multiple Case Study of Estonian Public Service Organizations The Legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Decision Making: Chinese Experience The Fairness Impact Assessment: Conceptualizing Problems of Fairness in Technological Design Operationalizing the Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: An Engineering Perspective Analysis of Production Line Project Based on Value Sensitive Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1