{"title":"2019年总统选举中伊斯兰主义与伊斯兰团体的政治空间之争","authors":"Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis","doi":"10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper explains the struggle for political space between Islamism and Islamic groups in the 2019 Presidential Election. The origin of the struggle for political space is closely related to the early history of Indonesian independence. The author considers that historical events are something important to analyze the 2019 Presidential Election issues. This study is a qualitative study using library data through descriptive analysis. The data analysis phase includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The author uses the triadic concept approach to spatial practise, representations of space, and representational spaces as a theoretical framework for analysis. The discussion of this article results in the conclusion that the “failure of political Islam” in the 2019 Presidential Election cannot be enforced. The 2019 presidential election showed that the struggle for political space was dominated by the Islamism group supporting Prabowo-Sandi and the Islamic group supporting Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Other explanations reveal that the debate and struggle over the political space of the Indonesian State is the impact of the historical cycle of independence. In the context of democracy, the political struggle over space is permissible, but every dynamic of the struggle over political space must be constitutional. ruang di dominasi oleh kelompok Islamisme pendukung Prabowo-Sandi dan kelompok Islami pendukung Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bahwa perdebatan dan perebutan politik ruang Negara Indonesia ini merupakan imbas dari siklus sejarah kemerdekaan. Dalam konteks demokrasi, perebutan politik ruang diperbolehkan, namun setiap dinamika perebutan politik ruang harus konstitusional.","PeriodicalId":137503,"journal":{"name":"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contestation on Political Space Between Islamism and Islamic Group in Presidential Election 2019\",\"authors\":\"Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis\",\"doi\":\"10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper explains the struggle for political space between Islamism and Islamic groups in the 2019 Presidential Election. The origin of the struggle for political space is closely related to the early history of Indonesian independence. The author considers that historical events are something important to analyze the 2019 Presidential Election issues. This study is a qualitative study using library data through descriptive analysis. The data analysis phase includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The author uses the triadic concept approach to spatial practise, representations of space, and representational spaces as a theoretical framework for analysis. The discussion of this article results in the conclusion that the “failure of political Islam” in the 2019 Presidential Election cannot be enforced. The 2019 presidential election showed that the struggle for political space was dominated by the Islamism group supporting Prabowo-Sandi and the Islamic group supporting Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Other explanations reveal that the debate and struggle over the political space of the Indonesian State is the impact of the historical cycle of independence. In the context of democracy, the political struggle over space is permissible, but every dynamic of the struggle over political space must be constitutional. ruang di dominasi oleh kelompok Islamisme pendukung Prabowo-Sandi dan kelompok Islami pendukung Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bahwa perdebatan dan perebutan politik ruang Negara Indonesia ini merupakan imbas dari siklus sejarah kemerdekaan. Dalam konteks demokrasi, perebutan politik ruang diperbolehkan, namun setiap dinamika perebutan politik ruang harus konstitusional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文解释了2019年总统选举中伊斯兰主义和伊斯兰团体之间的政治空间之争。政治空间斗争的起源与印尼独立的早期历史密切相关。作者认为,历史事件是分析2019年大选问题的重要因素。本研究采用描述性分析方法,利用图书馆资料进行定性研究。数据分析阶段包括数据简化、数据表示和得出结论。作者将空间实践、空间表征和表征空间的三元概念方法作为分析的理论框架。本文的讨论得出的结论是,2019年总统选举中“政治伊斯兰的失败”无法强制执行。2019年的总统选举表明,政治空间的争夺由支持普拉博沃-桑迪的伊斯兰组织和支持佐科维-马鲁夫的伊斯兰组织主导。其他解释表明,关于印度尼西亚国家政治空间的辩论和斗争是独立历史周期的影响。在民主的背景下,对空间的政治斗争是允许的,但对政治空间的斗争的每一种动力都必须符合宪法。我的名字叫Jokowi-Ma 'ruf。Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bawa perdeatan danperebutanan political,我是印尼国家元首,我是印尼国家元首,我是印尼国家元首。民主主义是民主主义,民主政治是民主主义,民主政治是民主主义。
Contestation on Political Space Between Islamism and Islamic Group in Presidential Election 2019
: This paper explains the struggle for political space between Islamism and Islamic groups in the 2019 Presidential Election. The origin of the struggle for political space is closely related to the early history of Indonesian independence. The author considers that historical events are something important to analyze the 2019 Presidential Election issues. This study is a qualitative study using library data through descriptive analysis. The data analysis phase includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The author uses the triadic concept approach to spatial practise, representations of space, and representational spaces as a theoretical framework for analysis. The discussion of this article results in the conclusion that the “failure of political Islam” in the 2019 Presidential Election cannot be enforced. The 2019 presidential election showed that the struggle for political space was dominated by the Islamism group supporting Prabowo-Sandi and the Islamic group supporting Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Other explanations reveal that the debate and struggle over the political space of the Indonesian State is the impact of the historical cycle of independence. In the context of democracy, the political struggle over space is permissible, but every dynamic of the struggle over political space must be constitutional. ruang di dominasi oleh kelompok Islamisme pendukung Prabowo-Sandi dan kelompok Islami pendukung Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bahwa perdebatan dan perebutan politik ruang Negara Indonesia ini merupakan imbas dari siklus sejarah kemerdekaan. Dalam konteks demokrasi, perebutan politik ruang diperbolehkan, namun setiap dinamika perebutan politik ruang harus konstitusional.