2019年总统选举中伊斯兰主义与伊斯兰团体的政治空间之争

Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis
{"title":"2019年总统选举中伊斯兰主义与伊斯兰团体的政治空间之争","authors":"Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis","doi":"10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper explains the struggle for political space between Islamism and Islamic groups in the 2019 Presidential Election. The origin of the struggle for political space is closely related to the early history of Indonesian independence. The author considers that historical events are something important to analyze the 2019 Presidential Election issues. This study is a qualitative study using library data through descriptive analysis. The data analysis phase includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The author uses the triadic concept approach to spatial practise, representations of space, and representational spaces as a theoretical framework for analysis. The discussion of this article results in the conclusion that the “failure of political Islam” in the 2019 Presidential Election cannot be enforced. The 2019 presidential election showed that the struggle for political space was dominated by the Islamism group supporting Prabowo-Sandi and the Islamic group supporting Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Other explanations reveal that the debate and struggle over the political space of the Indonesian State is the impact of the historical cycle of independence. In the context of democracy, the political struggle over space is permissible, but every dynamic of the struggle over political space must be constitutional. ruang di dominasi oleh kelompok Islamisme pendukung Prabowo-Sandi dan kelompok Islami pendukung Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bahwa perdebatan dan perebutan politik ruang Negara Indonesia ini merupakan imbas dari siklus sejarah kemerdekaan. Dalam konteks demokrasi, perebutan politik ruang diperbolehkan, namun setiap dinamika perebutan politik ruang harus konstitusional.","PeriodicalId":137503,"journal":{"name":"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contestation on Political Space Between Islamism and Islamic Group in Presidential Election 2019\",\"authors\":\"Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis\",\"doi\":\"10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper explains the struggle for political space between Islamism and Islamic groups in the 2019 Presidential Election. The origin of the struggle for political space is closely related to the early history of Indonesian independence. The author considers that historical events are something important to analyze the 2019 Presidential Election issues. This study is a qualitative study using library data through descriptive analysis. The data analysis phase includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The author uses the triadic concept approach to spatial practise, representations of space, and representational spaces as a theoretical framework for analysis. The discussion of this article results in the conclusion that the “failure of political Islam” in the 2019 Presidential Election cannot be enforced. The 2019 presidential election showed that the struggle for political space was dominated by the Islamism group supporting Prabowo-Sandi and the Islamic group supporting Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Other explanations reveal that the debate and struggle over the political space of the Indonesian State is the impact of the historical cycle of independence. In the context of democracy, the political struggle over space is permissible, but every dynamic of the struggle over political space must be constitutional. ruang di dominasi oleh kelompok Islamisme pendukung Prabowo-Sandi dan kelompok Islami pendukung Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bahwa perdebatan dan perebutan politik ruang Negara Indonesia ini merupakan imbas dari siklus sejarah kemerdekaan. Dalam konteks demokrasi, perebutan politik ruang diperbolehkan, namun setiap dinamika perebutan politik ruang harus konstitusional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v20i2.1932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文解释了2019年总统选举中伊斯兰主义和伊斯兰团体之间的政治空间之争。政治空间斗争的起源与印尼独立的早期历史密切相关。作者认为,历史事件是分析2019年大选问题的重要因素。本研究采用描述性分析方法,利用图书馆资料进行定性研究。数据分析阶段包括数据简化、数据表示和得出结论。作者将空间实践、空间表征和表征空间的三元概念方法作为分析的理论框架。本文的讨论得出的结论是,2019年总统选举中“政治伊斯兰的失败”无法强制执行。2019年的总统选举表明,政治空间的争夺由支持普拉博沃-桑迪的伊斯兰组织和支持佐科维-马鲁夫的伊斯兰组织主导。其他解释表明,关于印度尼西亚国家政治空间的辩论和斗争是独立历史周期的影响。在民主的背景下,对空间的政治斗争是允许的,但对政治空间的斗争的每一种动力都必须符合宪法。我的名字叫Jokowi-Ma 'ruf。Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bawa perdeatan danperebutanan political,我是印尼国家元首,我是印尼国家元首,我是印尼国家元首。民主主义是民主主义,民主政治是民主主义,民主政治是民主主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contestation on Political Space Between Islamism and Islamic Group in Presidential Election 2019
: This paper explains the struggle for political space between Islamism and Islamic groups in the 2019 Presidential Election. The origin of the struggle for political space is closely related to the early history of Indonesian independence. The author considers that historical events are something important to analyze the 2019 Presidential Election issues. This study is a qualitative study using library data through descriptive analysis. The data analysis phase includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The author uses the triadic concept approach to spatial practise, representations of space, and representational spaces as a theoretical framework for analysis. The discussion of this article results in the conclusion that the “failure of political Islam” in the 2019 Presidential Election cannot be enforced. The 2019 presidential election showed that the struggle for political space was dominated by the Islamism group supporting Prabowo-Sandi and the Islamic group supporting Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Other explanations reveal that the debate and struggle over the political space of the Indonesian State is the impact of the historical cycle of independence. In the context of democracy, the political struggle over space is permissible, but every dynamic of the struggle over political space must be constitutional. ruang di dominasi oleh kelompok Islamisme pendukung Prabowo-Sandi dan kelompok Islami pendukung Jokowi-Ma’ruf. Penjelasan lainnya mengungkapkan bahwa perdebatan dan perebutan politik ruang Negara Indonesia ini merupakan imbas dari siklus sejarah kemerdekaan. Dalam konteks demokrasi, perebutan politik ruang diperbolehkan, namun setiap dinamika perebutan politik ruang harus konstitusional.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CRYPTOCURRENCY AS MONEY: Islamic Monetary System Perspective Islamic Ethical Perspective of Environmental Abuse in Lagos State Nigeria ISLAMIC DISRUPTION: How Digital Platform Changes Religious Pattern of Muslim Society in Contemporary Indonesia Mainstreaming Strategies of Religious Moderation in Madrasah The Works of A Ma'rifa as A Phenomenon of Spiritual Counseling in Handling Non-Positivistic Psychic Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1