社会和文化系统中的群体认同

Brian Moriarty
{"title":"社会和文化系统中的群体认同","authors":"Brian Moriarty","doi":"10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research in this paper analyzes the common characteristics shared between social organizations of varied type and how personal and group identity within these groups is derived from the identification with common contextual artifacts. This analysis is performed through survey questions concerning markers of cultural identity posed to the Armenian Diaspora, a relatively small, geographically disparate, cultural group. Due to geographic dispersion, this group serves as a useful representative for illustrating common artifacts as well as divergences in markers of personal identity. Social systems are composed of an agglomeration of groups of this type, cultural and social, that are central in the formation of personal identity within a larger societal context. Groups identify themselves through self-imposed artifacts or by artifacts imposed by virtue of their identification within a given social or cultural group. These markers of identity sometimes serve as a unifying principle within varied social structures, but often serve a different purpose, as a dividing principal within organizations as well as cultural groups. The conflict resulting from this type of interaction serves as an impediment to organizational efficiency. Integration in corporate structures and similarly interorganizational attempts to broker coexistence between cultural groups sharing common geography or other binding characteristics are commonly challenged by issues of object identity resulting in strife derived from identification of cultural artifacts.","PeriodicalId":109868,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group identity in social and cultural systems\",\"authors\":\"Brian Moriarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research in this paper analyzes the common characteristics shared between social organizations of varied type and how personal and group identity within these groups is derived from the identification with common contextual artifacts. This analysis is performed through survey questions concerning markers of cultural identity posed to the Armenian Diaspora, a relatively small, geographically disparate, cultural group. Due to geographic dispersion, this group serves as a useful representative for illustrating common artifacts as well as divergences in markers of personal identity. Social systems are composed of an agglomeration of groups of this type, cultural and social, that are central in the formation of personal identity within a larger societal context. Groups identify themselves through self-imposed artifacts or by artifacts imposed by virtue of their identification within a given social or cultural group. These markers of identity sometimes serve as a unifying principle within varied social structures, but often serve a different purpose, as a dividing principal within organizations as well as cultural groups. The conflict resulting from this type of interaction serves as an impediment to organizational efficiency. Integration in corporate structures and similarly interorganizational attempts to broker coexistence between cultural groups sharing common geography or other binding characteristics are commonly challenged by issues of object identity resulting in strife derived from identification of cultural artifacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了不同类型的社会组织之间的共同特征,以及这些群体中的个人和群体身份是如何从对共同情境人工制品的认同中衍生出来的。这一分析是通过对亚美尼亚侨民(一个相对较小的、地理上不同的文化群体)提出的有关文化认同标志的调查问题进行的。由于地理上的分散,这个群体可以作为一个有用的代表来说明共同的人工制品以及个人身份标记的分歧。社会系统是由这种类型的文化和社会群体的聚集组成的,这是在更大的社会背景下形成个人身份的核心。群体通过自己强加的人工制品或在给定的社会或文化群体中由于他们的身份而强加的人工制品来识别自己。这些身份标志有时在不同的社会结构中作为统一的原则,但往往有不同的目的,在组织和文化群体中作为分裂的原则。这种类型的互动所产生的冲突会阻碍组织效率。公司结构的整合和类似的组织间尝试在共享共同地理或其他约束性特征的文化群体之间调解共存,通常受到客体身份问题的挑战,从而导致文化文物身份的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Group identity in social and cultural systems
The research in this paper analyzes the common characteristics shared between social organizations of varied type and how personal and group identity within these groups is derived from the identification with common contextual artifacts. This analysis is performed through survey questions concerning markers of cultural identity posed to the Armenian Diaspora, a relatively small, geographically disparate, cultural group. Due to geographic dispersion, this group serves as a useful representative for illustrating common artifacts as well as divergences in markers of personal identity. Social systems are composed of an agglomeration of groups of this type, cultural and social, that are central in the formation of personal identity within a larger societal context. Groups identify themselves through self-imposed artifacts or by artifacts imposed by virtue of their identification within a given social or cultural group. These markers of identity sometimes serve as a unifying principle within varied social structures, but often serve a different purpose, as a dividing principal within organizations as well as cultural groups. The conflict resulting from this type of interaction serves as an impediment to organizational efficiency. Integration in corporate structures and similarly interorganizational attempts to broker coexistence between cultural groups sharing common geography or other binding characteristics are commonly challenged by issues of object identity resulting in strife derived from identification of cultural artifacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a business case for Systems Engineering A systemic approach to managing risks of SoS Need for a framework for the assessment, evaluation and measurement of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness A Petri Net-T3SD policy driven method for IT infrastructure selection in smart grid Enterprise governance and boundary decisions: The case of wireless technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1