维持工作安全:事故、认知失败和压力

Robert S. Bridger, K. Brasher, A. J. Day
{"title":"维持工作安全:事故、认知失败和压力","authors":"Robert S. Bridger, K. Brasher, A. J. Day","doi":"10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data are presented from a cohort study of occupational stress. Measures of workplace strain (GHQ-12 score) and cognitive failure (cognitive failures questionnaire score) were obtained for 53 cohort members who had suffered a minor accident between 2007-2010. Each accident case was matched by age, seniority and gender with accident-free controls from the same cohort. It was found that: accident cases had higher GHQ and CFQ scores when compared to controls; people who had suffered psychological strain at work were approximately three times more likely to have an accident. Minor accidents at work are not random occurrences - they are more likely when personnel are under stress due to high work demands. Those with increased susceptibility to cognitive failures (i.e., a CFQ >;40) were approximately four times more likely to have an accident. The link between workplace stress and workplace safety should be made explicit to managers via health and safety programmes. Individuals suffering from chronic stress should be placed in less challenging environments, particularly if they typically work in high hazard industries and have to deal with cognitively demanding situations. Where it is not possible to change the work environment, the CFQ could be used as a selection tool - accident-prone people, most at risk when under stress, can be identified easily.","PeriodicalId":111259,"journal":{"name":"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustaining safety at work: Accidents, cognitive failure and stress\",\"authors\":\"Robert S. Bridger, K. Brasher, A. J. Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data are presented from a cohort study of occupational stress. Measures of workplace strain (GHQ-12 score) and cognitive failure (cognitive failures questionnaire score) were obtained for 53 cohort members who had suffered a minor accident between 2007-2010. Each accident case was matched by age, seniority and gender with accident-free controls from the same cohort. It was found that: accident cases had higher GHQ and CFQ scores when compared to controls; people who had suffered psychological strain at work were approximately three times more likely to have an accident. Minor accidents at work are not random occurrences - they are more likely when personnel are under stress due to high work demands. Those with increased susceptibility to cognitive failures (i.e., a CFQ >;40) were approximately four times more likely to have an accident. The link between workplace stress and workplace safety should be made explicit to managers via health and safety programmes. Individuals suffering from chronic stress should be placed in less challenging environments, particularly if they typically work in high hazard industries and have to deal with cognitively demanding situations. Where it is not possible to change the work environment, the CFQ could be used as a selection tool - accident-prone people, most at risk when under stress, can be identified easily.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

数据来自一项关于职业压力的队列研究。对2007-2010年间发生过轻微事故的53名队列成员进行了工作压力(GHQ-12得分)和认知失败(认知失败问卷得分)测量。每个事故病例按年龄、资历和性别与同一队列的无事故对照进行匹配。结果发现:与对照组相比,事故组GHQ和CFQ得分较高;在工作中遭受心理压力的人发生事故的可能性大约是普通人的三倍。工作中的小事故并不是偶然发生的——当员工由于高工作要求而处于压力之下时,它们更有可能发生。那些对认知失败更敏感的人(即,CFQ >;40)发生事故的可能性大约是普通人的四倍。工作场所压力与工作场所安全之间的联系应通过健康和安全方案向管理人员明确说明。患有慢性压力的人应该被安置在不那么具有挑战性的环境中,特别是如果他们通常在高危险行业工作,并且必须处理认知要求高的情况。在无法改变工作环境的情况下,CFQ可以作为一种选择工具——容易发生事故的人,在压力下最危险,可以很容易地被识别出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustaining safety at work: Accidents, cognitive failure and stress
Data are presented from a cohort study of occupational stress. Measures of workplace strain (GHQ-12 score) and cognitive failure (cognitive failures questionnaire score) were obtained for 53 cohort members who had suffered a minor accident between 2007-2010. Each accident case was matched by age, seniority and gender with accident-free controls from the same cohort. It was found that: accident cases had higher GHQ and CFQ scores when compared to controls; people who had suffered psychological strain at work were approximately three times more likely to have an accident. Minor accidents at work are not random occurrences - they are more likely when personnel are under stress due to high work demands. Those with increased susceptibility to cognitive failures (i.e., a CFQ >;40) were approximately four times more likely to have an accident. The link between workplace stress and workplace safety should be made explicit to managers via health and safety programmes. Individuals suffering from chronic stress should be placed in less challenging environments, particularly if they typically work in high hazard industries and have to deal with cognitively demanding situations. Where it is not possible to change the work environment, the CFQ could be used as a selection tool - accident-prone people, most at risk when under stress, can be identified easily.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity of heart rate variability as indicator of driver sleepiness Design of lobster fishing equipment and its contribution to fishery industrial cluster performance: Case study: East Java, Indonesia A simple, general and robust trust agent to help elderly select online services Occupant movement tracking in high-rise building evacuation planning using RFID technology and SMS gateway Effects of guided arrows on head-up display towards the vehicle windshield
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1