对尼日利亚宪政民主下政府行政部门立法权、三权分立、权力制衡的考察

Effiong A. Esu
{"title":"对尼日利亚宪政民主下政府行政部门立法权、三权分立、权力制衡的考察","authors":"Effiong A. Esu","doi":"10.53982/alj.2020.0801.10-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern day government is designed to reduce concentration of power, promote personal liberty and prevent abuse of power. Many Constitutions are therefore crafted to provide for distribution of governmental powers, separation of powers, checks and balances. This is a notable feature of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria which has prescribed the scope and limits for each arm of government, and areas to integrate the dispersed power into a workable government. Recently, the Supreme Court of Nigeria in Attorney-General of Abia State & 35 ors v. Attorney General of the Federation nullified Executive Order 10 issued by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which sought to grant financial autonomy to the state judiciary and legislature. The judgment of the apex Court has raised a number of constitutional issues which are germane to our constitutional democracy. It has brought to the fore the need for each organ to be independent within its own domain and no one organ of government has supervisory power or control over other arms. It espoused the sanctity of the doctrine of separation of powers, checks and balances as desirable under the Nigerian Presidential Constitution. The confusion associated with the advent of executive orders requires urgent clarification not only for the citizens but the operators of the constitution. This paper adopts the doctrinal research methodology and critically analyzes the constitutional provisions on the law-making power of the executive arm, separation of powers, and draws experiences from advanced constitutional democracies. It concludes that the 1999 constitution recognizes some level of integration and interaction amongst the different arms of government, and maintains a delicate balance to avoid concentration of power. It is therefore the responsibility of each arm of government to operate within its area of competence and respect the limit prescribed by the constitution.","PeriodicalId":123596,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Law Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the Lawmaking Power of the Executive Arm of Government, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances under the Nigerian Constitutional Democracy\",\"authors\":\"Effiong A. Esu\",\"doi\":\"10.53982/alj.2020.0801.10-j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern day government is designed to reduce concentration of power, promote personal liberty and prevent abuse of power. Many Constitutions are therefore crafted to provide for distribution of governmental powers, separation of powers, checks and balances. This is a notable feature of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria which has prescribed the scope and limits for each arm of government, and areas to integrate the dispersed power into a workable government. Recently, the Supreme Court of Nigeria in Attorney-General of Abia State & 35 ors v. Attorney General of the Federation nullified Executive Order 10 issued by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which sought to grant financial autonomy to the state judiciary and legislature. The judgment of the apex Court has raised a number of constitutional issues which are germane to our constitutional democracy. It has brought to the fore the need for each organ to be independent within its own domain and no one organ of government has supervisory power or control over other arms. It espoused the sanctity of the doctrine of separation of powers, checks and balances as desirable under the Nigerian Presidential Constitution. The confusion associated with the advent of executive orders requires urgent clarification not only for the citizens but the operators of the constitution. This paper adopts the doctrinal research methodology and critically analyzes the constitutional provisions on the law-making power of the executive arm, separation of powers, and draws experiences from advanced constitutional democracies. It concludes that the 1999 constitution recognizes some level of integration and interaction amongst the different arms of government, and maintains a delicate balance to avoid concentration of power. It is therefore the responsibility of each arm of government to operate within its area of competence and respect the limit prescribed by the constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2020.0801.10-j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2020.0801.10-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代政府旨在减少权力集中,促进个人自由,防止权力滥用。因此,许多宪法都是为了规定政府权力的分配、三权分立、权力制衡而制定的。这是1999年尼日利亚宪法的一个显著特征,它规定了政府各部门的范围和限制,以及将分散的权力整合到一个可行的政府的领域。最近,尼日利亚最高法院在阿比亚州总检察长案和35人诉联邦总检察长案中废除了尼日利亚联邦共和国总统发布的第10号行政命令,该命令谋求给予州司法和立法机关财政自主权。最高法院的判决提出了一些与我们的宪政民主密切相关的宪制问题。它突出了每个机构在自己的领域内保持独立的必要性,任何一个政府机构都没有监督或控制其他机构的权力。它支持尼日利亚总统宪法所要求的权力分立和制衡原则的神圣性。与行政命令的出现有关的混乱不仅需要对公民,而且需要对宪法的执行者进行紧急澄清。本文采用理论研究方法,批判性地分析了宪法对行政机关立法权、三权分立的规定,并借鉴了先进宪政民主国家的经验。它的结论是,1999年宪法承认政府不同部门之间的某种程度的整合和互动,并保持微妙的平衡,以避免权力集中。因此,每一个政府部门都有责任在其权限范围内运作,并尊重宪法规定的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examination of the Lawmaking Power of the Executive Arm of Government, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances under the Nigerian Constitutional Democracy
Modern day government is designed to reduce concentration of power, promote personal liberty and prevent abuse of power. Many Constitutions are therefore crafted to provide for distribution of governmental powers, separation of powers, checks and balances. This is a notable feature of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria which has prescribed the scope and limits for each arm of government, and areas to integrate the dispersed power into a workable government. Recently, the Supreme Court of Nigeria in Attorney-General of Abia State & 35 ors v. Attorney General of the Federation nullified Executive Order 10 issued by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which sought to grant financial autonomy to the state judiciary and legislature. The judgment of the apex Court has raised a number of constitutional issues which are germane to our constitutional democracy. It has brought to the fore the need for each organ to be independent within its own domain and no one organ of government has supervisory power or control over other arms. It espoused the sanctity of the doctrine of separation of powers, checks and balances as desirable under the Nigerian Presidential Constitution. The confusion associated with the advent of executive orders requires urgent clarification not only for the citizens but the operators of the constitution. This paper adopts the doctrinal research methodology and critically analyzes the constitutional provisions on the law-making power of the executive arm, separation of powers, and draws experiences from advanced constitutional democracies. It concludes that the 1999 constitution recognizes some level of integration and interaction amongst the different arms of government, and maintains a delicate balance to avoid concentration of power. It is therefore the responsibility of each arm of government to operate within its area of competence and respect the limit prescribed by the constitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CRYPTO-EXCHANGES IN NIGERIA: A REVIEW OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIONS IN REGENERATIVE MEDICINE. NAVIGATING THE FUTURE: ROBO-ADVISORS IN THE FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE. THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART): EXAMINING THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. EXAMINATION OF THE OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED DOCUMENTS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1