使用机器学习算法分析虚拟学习环境中的大学高危学生

Deshalin Naidoo, Timothy T. Adeliyi
{"title":"使用机器学习算法分析虚拟学习环境中的大学高危学生","authors":"Deshalin Naidoo, Timothy T. Adeliyi","doi":"10.1109/ICTAS56421.2023.10082752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students at risk in universities are becoming a rising global issue. These are students who have a high likelihood of dropping out of their respective academic programs. Due to the importance and impact on students, if interventions are not implemented, research on students at risk is garnering widespread attention in the literature. Early identification of these at-risk students is essential for intervention to lessen the likelihood of dropout. On a virtual learning environment dataset, this study compared Adaboost with five other machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Decision Trees, to detect students at risk. This study focused on training and evaluating the six machine learning models adopted, employing performance evaluation metrics such as F1 score, Confusion Matrix, Recall, Precision, ROC, error rate, and accuracy. Adaboost was found to be the top-performing algorithm, having the highest accuracy, F1 score, Precision, and Recall.","PeriodicalId":158720,"journal":{"name":"2023 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing University at-Risk Students in a Virtual Learning Environment using Machine Learning Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Deshalin Naidoo, Timothy T. Adeliyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAS56421.2023.10082752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students at risk in universities are becoming a rising global issue. These are students who have a high likelihood of dropping out of their respective academic programs. Due to the importance and impact on students, if interventions are not implemented, research on students at risk is garnering widespread attention in the literature. Early identification of these at-risk students is essential for intervention to lessen the likelihood of dropout. On a virtual learning environment dataset, this study compared Adaboost with five other machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Decision Trees, to detect students at risk. This study focused on training and evaluating the six machine learning models adopted, employing performance evaluation metrics such as F1 score, Confusion Matrix, Recall, Precision, ROC, error rate, and accuracy. Adaboost was found to be the top-performing algorithm, having the highest accuracy, F1 score, Precision, and Recall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAS56421.2023.10082752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAS56421.2023.10082752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大学里面临风险的学生正在成为一个日益严重的全球性问题。这些学生很有可能退出各自的学术课程。由于对学生的重要性和影响,如果不实施干预措施,对处于危险中的学生的研究在文献中得到了广泛的关注。早期识别这些有风险的学生对于减少辍学可能性的干预至关重要。在虚拟学习环境数据集上,本研究将Adaboost与其他五种机器学习算法(包括随机森林、逻辑回归、支持向量机和决策树)进行了比较,以检测有风险的学生。本研究的重点是训练和评估所采用的六种机器学习模型,采用F1分数、混淆矩阵、召回率、精确率、ROC、错误率和准确率等性能评估指标。Adaboost被发现是表现最好的算法,具有最高的准确性,F1分数,精度和召回率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysing University at-Risk Students in a Virtual Learning Environment using Machine Learning Algorithms
Students at risk in universities are becoming a rising global issue. These are students who have a high likelihood of dropping out of their respective academic programs. Due to the importance and impact on students, if interventions are not implemented, research on students at risk is garnering widespread attention in the literature. Early identification of these at-risk students is essential for intervention to lessen the likelihood of dropout. On a virtual learning environment dataset, this study compared Adaboost with five other machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Decision Trees, to detect students at risk. This study focused on training and evaluating the six machine learning models adopted, employing performance evaluation metrics such as F1 score, Confusion Matrix, Recall, Precision, ROC, error rate, and accuracy. Adaboost was found to be the top-performing algorithm, having the highest accuracy, F1 score, Precision, and Recall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of anxiety on students' behavioural intention to use business simulation games Biometric Recognition of Infants Using Fingerprints: Can the infant fingerprint be used for secure authentication? A study on farmers' perceptions about the scope of the Kisan Suvidha App in improving agricultural sustainability Enhancing Traffic Simulations Analysis Efficacy using Multiperspective Heterogeneous Toolset Implementation of ensemble machine learning classifiers to predict diarrhoea with SMOTEENN, SMOTE, and SMOTETomek class imbalance approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1