{"title":"早期儒家思想中的假装疯狂、矛盾与怀疑","authors":"Alexus McLeod","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 focuses on the “negative” account of madness found in numerous early texts, most clearly associated with Confucians, that takes madness as the result of character flaw. This chapter focuses on the concept of yangkuang (feigned madness) as a strategy for avoiding responsibility, as well as the idea of legitimate madness as caused by key failures in self-cultivation, particularly regulation of emotions.","PeriodicalId":164762,"journal":{"name":"The Dao of Madness","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feigned Madness, Ambivalence, and Doubt in Early Confucianism\",\"authors\":\"Alexus McLeod\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 3 focuses on the “negative” account of madness found in numerous early texts, most clearly associated with Confucians, that takes madness as the result of character flaw. This chapter focuses on the concept of yangkuang (feigned madness) as a strategy for avoiding responsibility, as well as the idea of legitimate madness as caused by key failures in self-cultivation, particularly regulation of emotions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Dao of Madness\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Dao of Madness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Dao of Madness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feigned Madness, Ambivalence, and Doubt in Early Confucianism
Chapter 3 focuses on the “negative” account of madness found in numerous early texts, most clearly associated with Confucians, that takes madness as the result of character flaw. This chapter focuses on the concept of yangkuang (feigned madness) as a strategy for avoiding responsibility, as well as the idea of legitimate madness as caused by key failures in self-cultivation, particularly regulation of emotions.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
