{"title":"组织审查制度与社区发展项目的可持续性对肯尼亚内罗毕县医院的个案研究","authors":"Genia Bukebuke, Stephen Asatsa, Rachael Gesami","doi":"10.47941/ijdcs.1309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: There has been a long debate on the relationship between organizational review systems and sustainability of community development projects. This study focused on organizational review systems and sustainability of community development projects; a case study of hospitals in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study specifically assessed the effects of assessment meetings, multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops and review sessions on community development hospitals projects’ sustainability in Nairobi County. The study was anchored on theory of Change and Freirean Theory of Dialogue and Society. \nMethodology: The study employed descriptive survey design which combined both quantitative and qualitative methods. The target population of this study was 3600 respondents. Yamane (1967) formula was applied to sampled 360 respondents consisting of 15 Project Steering Committee (PSC) Members, 15 Project Coordinators and 15 Heads of Departments in charge of health projects from 8 hospitals in Nairobi County. Construct and content validity of the instruments was ascertained through counterchecking by the supervisors while the reliability of the instruments was ascertained through test retests method. Quantitative data was analyzed and presented in frequency distribution tables, pie charts and bar graphs (SPSS version 25). Qualitative data was analyzed thematically according to each research questions and presented in a narrative form. \nFindings: Findings revealed that assessment meetings in community development hospitals projects in Nairobi County gives the foundation on effective measures both substantive and operation to improve the project design, manner of implementation and quality of results for the sustainability of community development hospitals projects. Multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops were found to be assisting in the perfection of practices and provide a platform for liability so as to ascertain whether the objectives have been achieved for the sustainability of the community development projects. Review sessions assists influence project sustainability in that it ensures that project results at the levels of impact, outcome, output, process along with input can be quantified so as to offer a framework for accountability and in assisting in making informed decision at program and policy levels. \nUnique contributions to theory, practice and policy: This study recommended that there is need for managers of community development hospitals projects in Nairobi County to establish multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops roles at a departmental level in order to strengthen the consistency of project management across the various community projects. This will improve the project development.","PeriodicalId":226878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Developing Country Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Review Systems and Sustainability of Community Development Projects; A Case Study of Hospitals in Nairobi County, Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Genia Bukebuke, Stephen Asatsa, Rachael Gesami\",\"doi\":\"10.47941/ijdcs.1309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: There has been a long debate on the relationship between organizational review systems and sustainability of community development projects. This study focused on organizational review systems and sustainability of community development projects; a case study of hospitals in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study specifically assessed the effects of assessment meetings, multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops and review sessions on community development hospitals projects’ sustainability in Nairobi County. The study was anchored on theory of Change and Freirean Theory of Dialogue and Society. \\nMethodology: The study employed descriptive survey design which combined both quantitative and qualitative methods. The target population of this study was 3600 respondents. Yamane (1967) formula was applied to sampled 360 respondents consisting of 15 Project Steering Committee (PSC) Members, 15 Project Coordinators and 15 Heads of Departments in charge of health projects from 8 hospitals in Nairobi County. Construct and content validity of the instruments was ascertained through counterchecking by the supervisors while the reliability of the instruments was ascertained through test retests method. Quantitative data was analyzed and presented in frequency distribution tables, pie charts and bar graphs (SPSS version 25). Qualitative data was analyzed thematically according to each research questions and presented in a narrative form. \\nFindings: Findings revealed that assessment meetings in community development hospitals projects in Nairobi County gives the foundation on effective measures both substantive and operation to improve the project design, manner of implementation and quality of results for the sustainability of community development hospitals projects. Multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops were found to be assisting in the perfection of practices and provide a platform for liability so as to ascertain whether the objectives have been achieved for the sustainability of the community development projects. Review sessions assists influence project sustainability in that it ensures that project results at the levels of impact, outcome, output, process along with input can be quantified so as to offer a framework for accountability and in assisting in making informed decision at program and policy levels. \\nUnique contributions to theory, practice and policy: This study recommended that there is need for managers of community development hospitals projects in Nairobi County to establish multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops roles at a departmental level in order to strengthen the consistency of project management across the various community projects. This will improve the project development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Developing Country Studies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Developing Country Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijdcs.1309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Developing Country Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijdcs.1309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:关于组织审查制度与社区发展项目可持续性之间的关系一直存在长期争论。这项研究的重点是组织审查制度和社区发展项目的可持续性;对肯尼亚内罗毕县医院的案例研究。这项研究具体评估了评估会议、多方利益攸关方对话讲习班和审查会议对内罗毕县社区发展医院项目可持续性的影响。该研究以变革理论和自由主义的对话与社会理论为基础。研究方法:采用定性与定量相结合的描述性调查设计。这项研究的目标人群是3600名受访者。将Yamane(1967年)公式应用于抽样调查的360名答复者,其中包括来自内罗毕县8家医院的15名项目指导委员会成员、15名项目协调员和15名负责卫生项目的部门负责人。通过监考人员的复核来确定量表的结构效度和内容效度,通过复测法来确定量表的信度。对定量数据进行分析,并以频率分布表、饼图和条形图(SPSS version 25)的形式呈现。根据每个研究问题对定性数据进行主题分析,并以叙事形式呈现。调查结果:调查结果显示,内罗毕县社区发展医院项目的评估会议为制定有效的实质性和操作措施奠定了基础,以改进项目设计、执行方式和成果质量,促进社区发展医院项目的可持续性。多方利益攸关方对话讲习班被认为有助于完善做法,并提供一个追究责任的平台,以便确定社区发展项目的可持续性目标是否已经实现。审查会议有助于影响项目的可持续性,因为它确保项目在影响、成果、产出、过程和投入等层面的成果可以量化,从而为问责制提供框架,并协助在方案和政策层面做出知情决定。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:这项研究建议,内罗毕县社区发展医院项目的管理人员需要在部门一级建立多方利益攸关方对话讲习班的作用,以便加强各个社区项目项目管理的一致性。这将改善项目的发展。
Organizational Review Systems and Sustainability of Community Development Projects; A Case Study of Hospitals in Nairobi County, Kenya
Purpose: There has been a long debate on the relationship between organizational review systems and sustainability of community development projects. This study focused on organizational review systems and sustainability of community development projects; a case study of hospitals in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study specifically assessed the effects of assessment meetings, multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops and review sessions on community development hospitals projects’ sustainability in Nairobi County. The study was anchored on theory of Change and Freirean Theory of Dialogue and Society.
Methodology: The study employed descriptive survey design which combined both quantitative and qualitative methods. The target population of this study was 3600 respondents. Yamane (1967) formula was applied to sampled 360 respondents consisting of 15 Project Steering Committee (PSC) Members, 15 Project Coordinators and 15 Heads of Departments in charge of health projects from 8 hospitals in Nairobi County. Construct and content validity of the instruments was ascertained through counterchecking by the supervisors while the reliability of the instruments was ascertained through test retests method. Quantitative data was analyzed and presented in frequency distribution tables, pie charts and bar graphs (SPSS version 25). Qualitative data was analyzed thematically according to each research questions and presented in a narrative form.
Findings: Findings revealed that assessment meetings in community development hospitals projects in Nairobi County gives the foundation on effective measures both substantive and operation to improve the project design, manner of implementation and quality of results for the sustainability of community development hospitals projects. Multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops were found to be assisting in the perfection of practices and provide a platform for liability so as to ascertain whether the objectives have been achieved for the sustainability of the community development projects. Review sessions assists influence project sustainability in that it ensures that project results at the levels of impact, outcome, output, process along with input can be quantified so as to offer a framework for accountability and in assisting in making informed decision at program and policy levels.
Unique contributions to theory, practice and policy: This study recommended that there is need for managers of community development hospitals projects in Nairobi County to establish multi-stakeholder dialogue workshops roles at a departmental level in order to strengthen the consistency of project management across the various community projects. This will improve the project development.