不同相位像差校正策略对像差介质中后向散射系数估计精度的模拟研究

Eduardo A. Gonzalez, N. Sheth, B. Castañeda, J. Dahl, R. Lavarello
{"title":"不同相位像差校正策略对像差介质中后向散射系数估计精度的模拟研究","authors":"Eduardo A. Gonzalez, N. Sheth, B. Castañeda, J. Dahl, R. Lavarello","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phase aberration is the distortion of the diffraction pattern when a wave propagates in a medium with an inhomogeneous sound speed. In this study, the accuracy of the estimation of backscatter coefficients (BSCs) in the presence of near-field phase aberrations was studied through simulations. Further, the accuracy was also evaluated when using two different phase aberration correction strategies prior to BSC estimation. Simulations were performed using the FIELD II software for pulsed ultrasound field calculation. The simulation utilized a 45 element, 3.5 MHz linear array with 70% bandwidth. The imaging medium consisted of randomly positioned circular scatterers having a diameter of 176 microns. Near field phase aberrators were applied to the transmit and receive signals of the simulation having 50, 75, and 100 ns RMS strength and a 3 mm correlation length. Phase aberrations were estimated using a multi-lag least squares estimation technique. BSCs were estimated using the reference phantom method and radiofrequency data segments with a length of 14 wavelengths and centered around the transducer transmit focus. BSC estimation accuracy was quantified using the average difference in dB between the theoretical and estimated curves within the -10 dB bandwidth of the transducer. The mean BSC estimation errors were -9.31, -12.82 and -15.58 dB in the presence of the 50, 75 and 100 ns aberrators, respectively. The use of aberration correction on receive was inadequate for the BSC accuracy for all three cases. The estimation errors for the 50 ns, 75 ns and 100 ns aberrators were -7.24, -12.66 dB and -14.68 dB, respectively. In contrast, the use of aberration correction on transmit-receive allowed an accurate BSC estimation, with estimation errors lower than 0.7 dB for the first two cases. These results suggest that phase aberration effects may adversely influence the performance of BSC estimation, and that a robust BSC-based tissue characterization may require compensating for the effects of aberration on both transmit and receive beams.","PeriodicalId":153901,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of backscatter coefficient estimation in aberrating media using different phase aberration correction strategies - A simulation study\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo A. Gonzalez, N. Sheth, B. Castañeda, J. Dahl, R. Lavarello\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phase aberration is the distortion of the diffraction pattern when a wave propagates in a medium with an inhomogeneous sound speed. In this study, the accuracy of the estimation of backscatter coefficients (BSCs) in the presence of near-field phase aberrations was studied through simulations. Further, the accuracy was also evaluated when using two different phase aberration correction strategies prior to BSC estimation. Simulations were performed using the FIELD II software for pulsed ultrasound field calculation. The simulation utilized a 45 element, 3.5 MHz linear array with 70% bandwidth. The imaging medium consisted of randomly positioned circular scatterers having a diameter of 176 microns. Near field phase aberrators were applied to the transmit and receive signals of the simulation having 50, 75, and 100 ns RMS strength and a 3 mm correlation length. Phase aberrations were estimated using a multi-lag least squares estimation technique. BSCs were estimated using the reference phantom method and radiofrequency data segments with a length of 14 wavelengths and centered around the transducer transmit focus. BSC estimation accuracy was quantified using the average difference in dB between the theoretical and estimated curves within the -10 dB bandwidth of the transducer. The mean BSC estimation errors were -9.31, -12.82 and -15.58 dB in the presence of the 50, 75 and 100 ns aberrators, respectively. The use of aberration correction on receive was inadequate for the BSC accuracy for all three cases. The estimation errors for the 50 ns, 75 ns and 100 ns aberrators were -7.24, -12.66 dB and -14.68 dB, respectively. In contrast, the use of aberration correction on transmit-receive allowed an accurate BSC estimation, with estimation errors lower than 0.7 dB for the first two cases. These results suggest that phase aberration effects may adversely influence the performance of BSC estimation, and that a robust BSC-based tissue characterization may require compensating for the effects of aberration on both transmit and receive beams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

相位像差是波在声速不均匀的介质中传播时衍射图样的畸变。本文通过仿真研究了近场相位像差存在时后向散射系数估计的精度。此外,还评估了在BSC估计之前使用两种不同相位像差校正策略时的精度。利用FIELD II软件进行了脉冲超声场的模拟计算。仿真采用45元3.5 MHz线性阵列,带宽为70%。成像介质由随机定位的直径为176微米的圆形散射体组成。近场相位像差分别应用于模拟的发射和接收信号,其RMS强度分别为50、75和100 ns,相关长度为3 mm。采用多滞后最小二乘估计技术对相位像差进行估计。利用参考虚影法和以换能器发射焦点为中心的长度为14波长的射频数据段估计BSCs。利用换能器-10 dB带宽内理论曲线和估计曲线之间的平均dB差来量化BSC估计精度。在50、75和100 ns像差存在时,平均BSC估计误差分别为-9.31、-12.82和-15.58 dB。在接收时使用像差校正对所有三个病例的BSC准确性是不够的。50 ns、75 ns和100 ns像差的估计误差分别为-7.24、-12.66 dB和-14.68 dB。相比之下,在发射-接收上使用像差校正可以准确地估计BSC,前两种情况的估计误差低于0.7 dB。这些结果表明,相位像差效应可能会对BSC估计的性能产生不利影响,并且基于BSC的稳健组织表征可能需要补偿发射和接收光束上的像差影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of backscatter coefficient estimation in aberrating media using different phase aberration correction strategies - A simulation study
Phase aberration is the distortion of the diffraction pattern when a wave propagates in a medium with an inhomogeneous sound speed. In this study, the accuracy of the estimation of backscatter coefficients (BSCs) in the presence of near-field phase aberrations was studied through simulations. Further, the accuracy was also evaluated when using two different phase aberration correction strategies prior to BSC estimation. Simulations were performed using the FIELD II software for pulsed ultrasound field calculation. The simulation utilized a 45 element, 3.5 MHz linear array with 70% bandwidth. The imaging medium consisted of randomly positioned circular scatterers having a diameter of 176 microns. Near field phase aberrators were applied to the transmit and receive signals of the simulation having 50, 75, and 100 ns RMS strength and a 3 mm correlation length. Phase aberrations were estimated using a multi-lag least squares estimation technique. BSCs were estimated using the reference phantom method and radiofrequency data segments with a length of 14 wavelengths and centered around the transducer transmit focus. BSC estimation accuracy was quantified using the average difference in dB between the theoretical and estimated curves within the -10 dB bandwidth of the transducer. The mean BSC estimation errors were -9.31, -12.82 and -15.58 dB in the presence of the 50, 75 and 100 ns aberrators, respectively. The use of aberration correction on receive was inadequate for the BSC accuracy for all three cases. The estimation errors for the 50 ns, 75 ns and 100 ns aberrators were -7.24, -12.66 dB and -14.68 dB, respectively. In contrast, the use of aberration correction on transmit-receive allowed an accurate BSC estimation, with estimation errors lower than 0.7 dB for the first two cases. These results suggest that phase aberration effects may adversely influence the performance of BSC estimation, and that a robust BSC-based tissue characterization may require compensating for the effects of aberration on both transmit and receive beams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Carotid plaque assessment using non-invasive shear strain elastography Elastic modulus contrast enhancement in shear wave imaging using mechanical nonlinearity: In vitro tissue mimicking phantom study Tumor perfusion and neovascular morphology measurements using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging Application of a rigorous nonlinear P-matrix method to the simulation of third order intermodulation in test devices and duplexers Adaptive beamforming for thermal strain imaging using a single ultrasound linear array
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1