口腔咽皮试验在柑橘食物过敏诊断中的价值

E. Derkach, N. Aliakhnovich
{"title":"口腔咽皮试验在柑橘食物过敏诊断中的价值","authors":"E. Derkach, N. Aliakhnovich","doi":"10.14427/jipai.2021.3.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose. To assess the diagnostic significance of the oral-pharyngeal challenge test with extract (1) and tangerine juice (2) in comparison with intradermal allergy test with tangerine extract and prick-prick test with fresh tangerine in patients with food allergy. Materials and methods. The peroxidase activity of the oral fluid was assessed in healthy individuals after breakfast. Patients with allergic reactions to tangerine (study group), patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma and hay fever, but without food allergy (risk group) and healthy individuals (control group) underwent oral-pharyngeal challenge test with tangerine allergen extract (20 PNU/ ml)/freshly squeezed tangerine juice (1 PNU/ml) followed by evaluation of peroxidase activity of the oral fluid, intradermal tests with tangerine extract and prick-prick tests with fresh tangerine were performed. Results. The majority of patients with food allergy to tangerine had polyvalent sensitization to household/epidermal (76%) and pollen allergens (39%). The most common manifestation of tangerine allergy were urticaria (48% of cases), bronchospasm (21% of cases) and oral allergy syndrome (10%) After breakfast, the optical density of the oral fluid decreased compared to the initial level in all healthy volunteers (p=0,001). After oral-pharyngeal challenge test with tangerine extract (1) and juice (2), the average increase of peroxidase activity of the oral fluid in patients with food allergy was М1=+23,5 [7,0;40,1], М2=+41,4 [4,2;78,6], which was significantly higher than in controls M1=-2,1 [-9,6;5,4], p1=0,038, M2=+4,4 [-9,6;18,4], p2=0,047 and in patients with chronic allergopathology, but without food allergy M2=+0,4 [-13,1;13,8], p2=0,049. The positive prick-prick test with fresh tangerine was observed in 44% of patients in the study group, the standard intradermal test with tangerine allergen extract - in 12%. The intradermal test with tangerine extract and prick-prick test with fresh tangerine were negative in patients without food allergy and healthy individuals. Conclusions. The oral-pharyngeal challenge test with extract (1) and tangerine juice (2), prick-prick test with fresh tangerine (3) can be used in the diagnosis of food allergy to tangerine. The sensitivity and specificity of the challenge test with tangerine allergen extract were 53% and 88%, with tangerine juice – 44% and 89%, prick-prick test with fresh tangerine – 44% and 100%. The proposed tests had a higher diagnostic efficiency than the standard intradermal test with tangerine allergen extract (p1=0,01, p2=0,03, p3=0,039).","PeriodicalId":425120,"journal":{"name":"Immunopathology, Allergology, Infectology","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral-pharyngeal and skin testing in the diagnosis of food allergy to tangerine\",\"authors\":\"E. Derkach, N. Aliakhnovich\",\"doi\":\"10.14427/jipai.2021.3.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose. To assess the diagnostic significance of the oral-pharyngeal challenge test with extract (1) and tangerine juice (2) in comparison with intradermal allergy test with tangerine extract and prick-prick test with fresh tangerine in patients with food allergy. Materials and methods. The peroxidase activity of the oral fluid was assessed in healthy individuals after breakfast. Patients with allergic reactions to tangerine (study group), patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma and hay fever, but without food allergy (risk group) and healthy individuals (control group) underwent oral-pharyngeal challenge test with tangerine allergen extract (20 PNU/ ml)/freshly squeezed tangerine juice (1 PNU/ml) followed by evaluation of peroxidase activity of the oral fluid, intradermal tests with tangerine extract and prick-prick tests with fresh tangerine were performed. Results. The majority of patients with food allergy to tangerine had polyvalent sensitization to household/epidermal (76%) and pollen allergens (39%). The most common manifestation of tangerine allergy were urticaria (48% of cases), bronchospasm (21% of cases) and oral allergy syndrome (10%) After breakfast, the optical density of the oral fluid decreased compared to the initial level in all healthy volunteers (p=0,001). After oral-pharyngeal challenge test with tangerine extract (1) and juice (2), the average increase of peroxidase activity of the oral fluid in patients with food allergy was М1=+23,5 [7,0;40,1], М2=+41,4 [4,2;78,6], which was significantly higher than in controls M1=-2,1 [-9,6;5,4], p1=0,038, M2=+4,4 [-9,6;18,4], p2=0,047 and in patients with chronic allergopathology, but without food allergy M2=+0,4 [-13,1;13,8], p2=0,049. The positive prick-prick test with fresh tangerine was observed in 44% of patients in the study group, the standard intradermal test with tangerine allergen extract - in 12%. The intradermal test with tangerine extract and prick-prick test with fresh tangerine were negative in patients without food allergy and healthy individuals. Conclusions. The oral-pharyngeal challenge test with extract (1) and tangerine juice (2), prick-prick test with fresh tangerine (3) can be used in the diagnosis of food allergy to tangerine. The sensitivity and specificity of the challenge test with tangerine allergen extract were 53% and 88%, with tangerine juice – 44% and 89%, prick-prick test with fresh tangerine – 44% and 100%. The proposed tests had a higher diagnostic efficiency than the standard intradermal test with tangerine allergen extract (p1=0,01, p2=0,03, p3=0,039).\",\"PeriodicalId\":425120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunopathology, Allergology, Infectology\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunopathology, Allergology, Infectology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14427/jipai.2021.3.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopathology, Allergology, Infectology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14427/jipai.2021.3.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目的。评价提取液(1)和柑桔汁(2)口咽激射试验与柑桔提取液皮内过敏试验和鲜柑桔皮刺试验对食物过敏患者的诊断意义。材料和方法。在健康个体早餐后评估口服液的过氧化物酶活性。对橘子有过敏反应的患者(研究组)、有变应性鼻炎、支气管哮喘和花粉热但无食物过敏的患者(危险组)和健康个体(对照组)分别进行了橘子过敏原提取物(20 PNU/ml) /鲜榨橘子汁(1 PNU/ml)的口咽刺激试验,随后进行了口服液过氧化物酶活性评价、橘子提取物皮内试验和新鲜橘子刺刺试验。结果。大多数对橘子食物过敏的患者对家庭/表皮(76%)和花粉过敏原(39%)有多价致敏。橘子过敏最常见的表现是荨麻疹(48%的病例)、支气管痉挛(21%的病例)和口腔过敏综合征(10%)。早餐后,与所有健康志愿者的初始水平相比,口腔液的光密度下降(p= 0.001)。经陈皮提取物(1)和陈皮汁(2)口咽激射试验后,食物过敏患者口服液过氧化物酶活性平均升高М1=+23,5 [7,0,40,1], М2=+41,4[4,2,78,6],显著高于对照组M1=-2,1 [- 9,6,5,4], p1= 0.038, M2=+4,4 [-9,6;18,4], p2= 0.047;非食物过敏慢性变态反应病理患者M2=+0,4 [-13,1;13,8], p2= 0.049。在研究组中,44%的患者用新鲜橘子进行针刺试验,12%的患者用橘子过敏原提取物进行标准皮内试验。无食物过敏者和健康者皮内用陈皮提取物试验和新鲜陈皮刺试验均为阴性。结论。用提取液(1)和陈皮汁(2)进行口咽刺激试验,用新鲜陈皮进行刺刺试验(3)可用于诊断陈皮食物过敏。陈皮浸提液激发试验的敏感性和特异性分别为53%和88%,陈皮汁激发试验的敏感性和特异性分别为44%和89%,鲜陈皮刺刺试验的敏感性和特异性分别为44%和100%。该试验的诊断效率高于橘子过敏原提取物标准皮内试验(p1=0,01, p2=0,03, p3=0,039)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oral-pharyngeal and skin testing in the diagnosis of food allergy to tangerine
The purpose. To assess the diagnostic significance of the oral-pharyngeal challenge test with extract (1) and tangerine juice (2) in comparison with intradermal allergy test with tangerine extract and prick-prick test with fresh tangerine in patients with food allergy. Materials and methods. The peroxidase activity of the oral fluid was assessed in healthy individuals after breakfast. Patients with allergic reactions to tangerine (study group), patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma and hay fever, but without food allergy (risk group) and healthy individuals (control group) underwent oral-pharyngeal challenge test with tangerine allergen extract (20 PNU/ ml)/freshly squeezed tangerine juice (1 PNU/ml) followed by evaluation of peroxidase activity of the oral fluid, intradermal tests with tangerine extract and prick-prick tests with fresh tangerine were performed. Results. The majority of patients with food allergy to tangerine had polyvalent sensitization to household/epidermal (76%) and pollen allergens (39%). The most common manifestation of tangerine allergy were urticaria (48% of cases), bronchospasm (21% of cases) and oral allergy syndrome (10%) After breakfast, the optical density of the oral fluid decreased compared to the initial level in all healthy volunteers (p=0,001). After oral-pharyngeal challenge test with tangerine extract (1) and juice (2), the average increase of peroxidase activity of the oral fluid in patients with food allergy was М1=+23,5 [7,0;40,1], М2=+41,4 [4,2;78,6], which was significantly higher than in controls M1=-2,1 [-9,6;5,4], p1=0,038, M2=+4,4 [-9,6;18,4], p2=0,047 and in patients with chronic allergopathology, but without food allergy M2=+0,4 [-13,1;13,8], p2=0,049. The positive prick-prick test with fresh tangerine was observed in 44% of patients in the study group, the standard intradermal test with tangerine allergen extract - in 12%. The intradermal test with tangerine extract and prick-prick test with fresh tangerine were negative in patients without food allergy and healthy individuals. Conclusions. The oral-pharyngeal challenge test with extract (1) and tangerine juice (2), prick-prick test with fresh tangerine (3) can be used in the diagnosis of food allergy to tangerine. The sensitivity and specificity of the challenge test with tangerine allergen extract were 53% and 88%, with tangerine juice – 44% and 89%, prick-prick test with fresh tangerine – 44% and 100%. The proposed tests had a higher diagnostic efficiency than the standard intradermal test with tangerine allergen extract (p1=0,01, p2=0,03, p3=0,039).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peculiarities of management of renal transplant recipients with COVID-19: a clinical case report Potential effectiveness of sweat antimicrobial polypeptides against staphylococci Species diversity of Streptococcus in periodontal diseases Enzymatic activity of Chryseobacterium arthrospherae bacteria colonizing the respiratory tract of patients with cystic fibrosis Diagnostic value of copy number identification of the SERPING1 gene in patients with different types of hereditary angioedema associated with C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1