为什么黑人患子宫肌瘤的比例过高,我们如何检查这种差异?系统回顾

Mia A. Charifson M.A. , Dorice Vieira M.A., M.P.H. , Jacquelyn Shaw M.D. , Siobhan Kehoe M.D. , Gwendolyn P. Quinn Ph.D.
{"title":"为什么黑人患子宫肌瘤的比例过高,我们如何检查这种差异?系统回顾","authors":"Mia A. Charifson M.A. ,&nbsp;Dorice Vieira M.A., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Shaw M.D. ,&nbsp;Siobhan Kehoe M.D. ,&nbsp;Gwendolyn P. Quinn Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>To systematically review and summarize the literaure on nongenetic risk factors that may contribute to the racial disparity in </span>uterine fibroids (UF) that disproportionality impacts Black individuals at 2-3 times the rate of White individuals and how the racial disparity has been studied to date.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol checklist guided the systematic review process. From January 1 to June 1, 2021, relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Multiple investigators screened, assessed, extracted, and critically appraised the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 44 articles examined the relationship among UFs, race/ethnicity, and nongenetic risk factors, including cardiometabolic features, comorbidities, diet, chemical exposures, vitamin D levels, reproductive characteristics and socioeconomic factors, and life experiences. Most studies reported on the same 3 </span>cohort study populations, and there was inconsistent statistical reporting of the race/ethnicity, risk factors, and UF relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many potential risk factors related to the racial disparity in UF have been studied thus far. There is still little conclusive evidence regarding which risk factors are the greatest contributors to racial disparities in UF. Promising areas of research deserve greater attention and a greater diversity of study populations and analytical methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 256-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why are Black individuals disproportionately burdened with uterine fibroids and how are we examining this disparity? A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Mia A. Charifson M.A. ,&nbsp;Dorice Vieira M.A., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Shaw M.D. ,&nbsp;Siobhan Kehoe M.D. ,&nbsp;Gwendolyn P. Quinn Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>To systematically review and summarize the literaure on nongenetic risk factors that may contribute to the racial disparity in </span>uterine fibroids (UF) that disproportionality impacts Black individuals at 2-3 times the rate of White individuals and how the racial disparity has been studied to date.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol checklist guided the systematic review process. From January 1 to June 1, 2021, relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Multiple investigators screened, assessed, extracted, and critically appraised the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 44 articles examined the relationship among UFs, race/ethnicity, and nongenetic risk factors, including cardiometabolic features, comorbidities, diet, chemical exposures, vitamin D levels, reproductive characteristics and socioeconomic factors, and life experiences. Most studies reported on the same 3 </span>cohort study populations, and there was inconsistent statistical reporting of the race/ethnicity, risk factors, and UF relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many potential risk factors related to the racial disparity in UF have been studied thus far. There is still little conclusive evidence regarding which risk factors are the greatest contributors to racial disparities in UF. Promising areas of research deserve greater attention and a greater diversity of study populations and analytical methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F&S reviews\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 256-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F&S reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571922000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571922000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的系统回顾和总结有关非遗传危险因素可能导致黑人比例失调率为白人2-3倍的子宫肌瘤(UF)种族差异的文献,以及迄今为止有关种族差异的研究情况。证据评价系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目清单指导了系统评价过程。从2021年1月1日至6月1日,检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library的相关文章。多位研究者对数据进行筛选、评估、提取和批判性评估。结果共有44篇文章研究了UFs、种族/民族和非遗传风险因素之间的关系,包括心脏代谢特征、合并症、饮食、化学物质暴露、维生素D水平、生殖特征和社会经济因素以及生活经历。大多数研究报告了相同的3个队列研究人群,关于种族/民族、危险因素和UF关系的统计报告不一致。结论目前已经研究了许多与UF种族差异相关的潜在危险因素。关于哪些风险因素是佛罗里达大学种族差异的最大贡献者,仍然没有确凿的证据。有前途的研究领域应该得到更多的关注,研究人群和分析方法应该更加多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why are Black individuals disproportionately burdened with uterine fibroids and how are we examining this disparity? A systematic review

Objective

To systematically review and summarize the literaure on nongenetic risk factors that may contribute to the racial disparity in uterine fibroids (UF) that disproportionality impacts Black individuals at 2-3 times the rate of White individuals and how the racial disparity has been studied to date.

Evidence Review

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol checklist guided the systematic review process. From January 1 to June 1, 2021, relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Multiple investigators screened, assessed, extracted, and critically appraised the data.

Results

A total of 44 articles examined the relationship among UFs, race/ethnicity, and nongenetic risk factors, including cardiometabolic features, comorbidities, diet, chemical exposures, vitamin D levels, reproductive characteristics and socioeconomic factors, and life experiences. Most studies reported on the same 3 cohort study populations, and there was inconsistent statistical reporting of the race/ethnicity, risk factors, and UF relationship.

Conclusion

Many potential risk factors related to the racial disparity in UF have been studied thus far. There is still little conclusive evidence regarding which risk factors are the greatest contributors to racial disparities in UF. Promising areas of research deserve greater attention and a greater diversity of study populations and analytical methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Fertoprotective agents and tumor response: a narrative review Predicting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments: a systematic review and quality assessment of prediction models Promises and pitfalls of preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders: a narrative review The role of alpha-Klotho protein in male and female reproduction. A systematic review Prevalence of adenomyosis in symptomatic adolescents and young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1