柽柳控制

C. Barrows
{"title":"柽柳控制","authors":"C. Barrows","doi":"10.3368/er.11.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he control of tamarisk, or salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), is a controversial issue. There are several reasons for this. One is the presumed futility of control efforts. If tamarisk control is a lost cause,why devote precious money and labor to the effort? Another is that in areas that are heavily infested and have a long history of manipulation, it is often difficult, and may even be impossible, to determine just what the historic ecosystem was like. In addition there are questions about the recovery of native vegetation and recolonization by animals on sites from which tamarisk has been cleared. Under what conditions will the community recover more or less on its own? When is a more active program of restoration called for? What techniques are most likely to be effective? Despite these uncertainties, in 1986 we initiated a tamarisk control project in a heavily infested 10-hectare wetland in the Coachella Valley Preserve in Riverside County, California. While the project is just nearing completion, the results so far have been encouraging, and suggest that, while complete and perpetual eradication of tamarisk is unlikely in most situations, control followed by restoration of historic vegetation is a viable option in many watersheds.","PeriodicalId":105419,"journal":{"name":"Restoration & Management Notes","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TAMARISK CONTROL\",\"authors\":\"C. Barrows\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.11.1.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he control of tamarisk, or salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), is a controversial issue. There are several reasons for this. One is the presumed futility of control efforts. If tamarisk control is a lost cause,why devote precious money and labor to the effort? Another is that in areas that are heavily infested and have a long history of manipulation, it is often difficult, and may even be impossible, to determine just what the historic ecosystem was like. In addition there are questions about the recovery of native vegetation and recolonization by animals on sites from which tamarisk has been cleared. Under what conditions will the community recover more or less on its own? When is a more active program of restoration called for? What techniques are most likely to be effective? Despite these uncertainties, in 1986 we initiated a tamarisk control project in a heavily infested 10-hectare wetland in the Coachella Valley Preserve in Riverside County, California. While the project is just nearing completion, the results so far have been encouraging, and suggest that, while complete and perpetual eradication of tamarisk is unlikely in most situations, control followed by restoration of historic vegetation is a viable option in many watersheds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.11.1.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration & Management Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.11.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

红柳或盐杉木(Tamarix ramosissima)的控制是一个有争议的问题。这有几个原因。一个是假定控制努力是徒劳的。如果红柳防控注定要失败,为什么还要投入宝贵的金钱和人力呢?另一个原因是,在虫害严重、有长期人为操纵历史的地区,要确定历史上的生态系统是什么样的往往是困难的,甚至是不可能的。此外,还有一些问题是关于原生植被的恢复和动物在红柳被清除的地点重新定居的问题。在什么条件下,社会或多或少会自行恢复?什么时候需要更积极的恢复计划?什么技术最有可能是有效的?尽管存在这些不确定性,1986年,我们在加州河滨县科切拉山谷保护区一个10公顷的严重侵染湿地启动了红柳控制项目。虽然该项目刚刚接近完成,但迄今为止的结果令人鼓舞,并表明,虽然在大多数情况下不可能完全和永久地根除红柳,但在许多流域,控制之后恢复历史植被是一个可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TAMARISK CONTROL
T he control of tamarisk, or salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), is a controversial issue. There are several reasons for this. One is the presumed futility of control efforts. If tamarisk control is a lost cause,why devote precious money and labor to the effort? Another is that in areas that are heavily infested and have a long history of manipulation, it is often difficult, and may even be impossible, to determine just what the historic ecosystem was like. In addition there are questions about the recovery of native vegetation and recolonization by animals on sites from which tamarisk has been cleared. Under what conditions will the community recover more or less on its own? When is a more active program of restoration called for? What techniques are most likely to be effective? Despite these uncertainties, in 1986 we initiated a tamarisk control project in a heavily infested 10-hectare wetland in the Coachella Valley Preserve in Riverside County, California. While the project is just nearing completion, the results so far have been encouraging, and suggest that, while complete and perpetual eradication of tamarisk is unlikely in most situations, control followed by restoration of historic vegetation is a viable option in many watersheds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forests EDUCATION Forest Forests Conference Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1