基于安全契约的软件组件设计

Andreas Söderberg, Rolf Johansson
{"title":"基于安全契约的软件组件设计","authors":"Andreas Söderberg, Rolf Johansson","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss how to use a modified design methodology for contract based design (CBD) intended for development of software and component based systems by use of so called safety contracts. The primary purpose is to make a proposal on how to integrate safety contracts in a, for a tool, implementable way for automatic safety contract verification. This development technique is called safety contract based design (SCBD) in this paper. Focus is to discuss the similarities and differences between the actual contents in conventional CBD-contracts and safety contracts, and rules for how to verify agreements of safety contracts and how to ensure safety contract validity.","PeriodicalId":332420,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety contract based design of software components\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Söderberg, Rolf Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we discuss how to use a modified design methodology for contract based design (CBD) intended for development of software and component based systems by use of so called safety contracts. The primary purpose is to make a proposal on how to integrate safety contracts in a, for a tool, implementable way for automatic safety contract verification. This development technique is called safety contract based design (SCBD) in this paper. Focus is to discuss the similarities and differences between the actual contents in conventional CBD-contracts and safety contracts, and rules for how to verify agreements of safety contracts and how to ensure safety contract validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了如何使用一种改进的设计方法,用于基于合同的设计(CBD),旨在通过使用所谓的安全合同开发软件和基于组件的系统。主要目的是就如何以一种工具可实现的方式集成安全契约以实现自动安全契约验证提出建议。本文将这种开发技术称为基于安全契约的设计(SCBD)。重点讨论了传统cbd合同与安全合同实际内容的异同,以及安全合同协议的核查规则和安全合同的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety contract based design of software components
In this paper we discuss how to use a modified design methodology for contract based design (CBD) intended for development of software and component based systems by use of so called safety contracts. The primary purpose is to make a proposal on how to integrate safety contracts in a, for a tool, implementable way for automatic safety contract verification. This development technique is called safety contract based design (SCBD) in this paper. Focus is to discuss the similarities and differences between the actual contents in conventional CBD-contracts and safety contracts, and rules for how to verify agreements of safety contracts and how to ensure safety contract validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bug localisation through diverse sources of information A chain of accountabilities in open systems based on assured entrustments Estimating response time distribution of server application in software aging phenomenon Safety assessment of software-intensive medical devices: Introducing a safety quality model approach Detection of missing requirements using base requirements pairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1