商业数据伦理:高级分析和人工智能管理的新趋势

D. Hirsch, Tim Bartley, Aravind Chandrasekaran, Davon Norris, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Piers Norris Turner
{"title":"商业数据伦理:高级分析和人工智能管理的新趋势","authors":"D. Hirsch, Tim Bartley, Aravind Chandrasekaran, Davon Norris, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Piers Norris Turner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3828239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence are powerful technologies that, along with their benefits, create new threats to privacy, equality, fairness and transparency. Existing law does not yet protect sufficiently against these threats. This has led some organizations to pursue what they call “data ethics” or “AI ethics” in an attempt to bring advanced analytics and AI more into line with societal values and so legitimate their growing use of these technologies.<br><br>To date, much of the scholarship on data ethics has sought either to define the ethical principles to which organization should aspire, or to map out the laws and regulations needed to push organizations towards these ethical goals. While these two lines of inquiry are important, the literature is missing a critical third dimension: empirical work on how organizations are actually governing the threats that their use of advanced analytics and AI can generate. Good regulatory design requires such knowledge. Yet, while there have been important studies of how organizations manage privacy “on the ground” (Bamberger and Mulligan 2015), there has been little such work on the governance of advanced analytics and AI.<br><br>This report begins to fill this gap. Focusing on private sector organizations, the authors interviewed corporate privacy managers deemed by their peers to be leaders in the governance of advanced analytics and AI, as well as the lawyers, consultants and thought leaders who advise them on this topic. They also surveyed a wider range of privacy mangers. The study sought to answer three, fundamental questions about business data ethics management: (1) How do leading companies conceptualize the threats that their use of advanced analytics and AI pose for individuals, groups and the broader society? (2) If it is true that the law does not yet require companies to reduce these risks, then why are they pursuing data ethics? and (3) How are companies pursuing data ethics? What substantive benchmarks, management processes and technological solutions do they use towards this end?<br><br>The authors previously shared on SSRN their preliminary findings. This final report provides a much fuller picture. The report should provide legislators and policymakers with an empirical foundation for their efforts to regulate advanced analytics and AI, at the same time as it gives interested organizations ideas on how to improve their data ethics management.","PeriodicalId":128369,"journal":{"name":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business Data Ethics: Emerging Trends in the Governance of Advanced Analytics and AI\",\"authors\":\"D. Hirsch, Tim Bartley, Aravind Chandrasekaran, Davon Norris, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Piers Norris Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3828239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence are powerful technologies that, along with their benefits, create new threats to privacy, equality, fairness and transparency. Existing law does not yet protect sufficiently against these threats. This has led some organizations to pursue what they call “data ethics” or “AI ethics” in an attempt to bring advanced analytics and AI more into line with societal values and so legitimate their growing use of these technologies.<br><br>To date, much of the scholarship on data ethics has sought either to define the ethical principles to which organization should aspire, or to map out the laws and regulations needed to push organizations towards these ethical goals. While these two lines of inquiry are important, the literature is missing a critical third dimension: empirical work on how organizations are actually governing the threats that their use of advanced analytics and AI can generate. Good regulatory design requires such knowledge. Yet, while there have been important studies of how organizations manage privacy “on the ground” (Bamberger and Mulligan 2015), there has been little such work on the governance of advanced analytics and AI.<br><br>This report begins to fill this gap. Focusing on private sector organizations, the authors interviewed corporate privacy managers deemed by their peers to be leaders in the governance of advanced analytics and AI, as well as the lawyers, consultants and thought leaders who advise them on this topic. They also surveyed a wider range of privacy mangers. The study sought to answer three, fundamental questions about business data ethics management: (1) How do leading companies conceptualize the threats that their use of advanced analytics and AI pose for individuals, groups and the broader society? (2) If it is true that the law does not yet require companies to reduce these risks, then why are they pursuing data ethics? and (3) How are companies pursuing data ethics? What substantive benchmarks, management processes and technological solutions do they use towards this end?<br><br>The authors previously shared on SSRN their preliminary findings. This final report provides a much fuller picture. The report should provide legislators and policymakers with an empirical foundation for their efforts to regulate advanced analytics and AI, at the same time as it gives interested organizations ideas on how to improve their data ethics management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3828239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3828239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

高级分析和人工智能是强大的技术,在带来好处的同时,也对隐私、平等、公平和透明度造成了新的威胁。现有法律还不能充分保护人们免受这些威胁。这促使一些组织开始追求所谓的 "数据伦理 "或 "人工智能伦理",试图使先进的分析技术和人工智能更加符合社会价值观,从而使他们对这些技术越来越多的使用合法化。迄今为止,有关数据伦理的大部分学术研究要么试图定义组织应该追求的伦理原则,要么试图制定推动组织实现这些伦理目标所需的法律法规。虽然这两个方面都很重要,但文献中还缺少关键的第三个维度:关于组织如何实际管理其使用高级分析和人工智能可能产生的威胁的实证工作。良好的监管设计需要这方面的知识。然而,尽管对组织如何 "实地 "管理隐私进行了重要研究(班伯格和穆里根,2015 年),但关于高级分析和人工智能治理的此类研究却很少。作者以私营部门组织为重点,采访了被同行视为高级分析和人工智能治理领导者的企业隐私管理者,以及为他们提供相关建议的律师、顾问和思想领袖。他们还对更广泛的隐私管理者进行了调查。这项研究试图回答有关商业数据道德管理的三个基本问题:(1)领先企业如何看待其使用高级分析和人工智能对个人、团体和社会造成的威胁?(2)如果法律确实尚未要求公司降低这些风险,那么它们为什么要追求数据伦理?为此,他们使用了哪些实质性基准、管理流程和技术解决方案?这份最终报告提供了更全面的信息。该报告应为立法者和政策制定者监管高级分析和人工智能的工作提供实证依据,同时为相关组织提供如何改进数据伦理管理的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Business Data Ethics: Emerging Trends in the Governance of Advanced Analytics and AI
Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence are powerful technologies that, along with their benefits, create new threats to privacy, equality, fairness and transparency. Existing law does not yet protect sufficiently against these threats. This has led some organizations to pursue what they call “data ethics” or “AI ethics” in an attempt to bring advanced analytics and AI more into line with societal values and so legitimate their growing use of these technologies.

To date, much of the scholarship on data ethics has sought either to define the ethical principles to which organization should aspire, or to map out the laws and regulations needed to push organizations towards these ethical goals. While these two lines of inquiry are important, the literature is missing a critical third dimension: empirical work on how organizations are actually governing the threats that their use of advanced analytics and AI can generate. Good regulatory design requires such knowledge. Yet, while there have been important studies of how organizations manage privacy “on the ground” (Bamberger and Mulligan 2015), there has been little such work on the governance of advanced analytics and AI.

This report begins to fill this gap. Focusing on private sector organizations, the authors interviewed corporate privacy managers deemed by their peers to be leaders in the governance of advanced analytics and AI, as well as the lawyers, consultants and thought leaders who advise them on this topic. They also surveyed a wider range of privacy mangers. The study sought to answer three, fundamental questions about business data ethics management: (1) How do leading companies conceptualize the threats that their use of advanced analytics and AI pose for individuals, groups and the broader society? (2) If it is true that the law does not yet require companies to reduce these risks, then why are they pursuing data ethics? and (3) How are companies pursuing data ethics? What substantive benchmarks, management processes and technological solutions do they use towards this end?

The authors previously shared on SSRN their preliminary findings. This final report provides a much fuller picture. The report should provide legislators and policymakers with an empirical foundation for their efforts to regulate advanced analytics and AI, at the same time as it gives interested organizations ideas on how to improve their data ethics management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blockchain Technology and Intellectual Property – A Basic Introduction Endogenous Data Collection in Platform Markets: Privacy and Welfare Beyond Bitcoin: The Economics of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies (Chapter 6: Smart Contracts and Blockchain) Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple's New App Tracking Policy Cryptocurrency & Its Impact on Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1