关于法律的实际效果

Sung Ho Park
{"title":"关于法律的实际效果","authors":"Sung Ho Park","doi":"10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As is well known, the rule of law is the principle that power should be exercised based on laws enacted and revised by the legislature. Therefore, the rule of law is a principle that power cannot be arbitrarily exercised or exercised by a person in power, but must be exercised only on the basis of law. In other words, the rule of law is to prevent abuse of power by limiting the arbitrary and subjective exercise of power by requiring the exercise of power to be based on the law. However, opinions are still divided as to why the rule of law is necessary and what it means. The rule of law is a principle to prevent and limit abuse of power by requiring the exercise of power to be based on the law, or guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights by limiting the exercise of power to be based on the law. These various views on the rule of law are related to what the national community wants to achieve through the rule of law. I think that the exercise of power is to prevent abuse of power and to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights by demanding that it be based on the law. In other words, when the exercise of power is arbitrary and subjective by the person in power, it only brings about the expansion of power, but individual freedom and rights are bound to be limited. Therefore, the rule of law should be exercised on the basis of 'law' rather than the subjective will of individuals or power, and infringement of individual freedom and rights by powerful people or power groups should not be recognized without the basis of law. However, given that the law is enacted by the power group and reflects the subjective will of the power group, it is problematic to call it the rule of law if the exercise of power is based on the law. This is because if power is exercised based on the law only by the arbitrary and subjective will of the powerful person or the power group, it can be reduced to a tool that can suppress individual freedom and rights. In other words, if power is exercised based on laws only for power people or power purposes, it can mean the expansion of power, not the restriction and abuse of power. Therefore, if the purpose of the rule of law is to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights, the law for the rule of law should be recognized only when power is exercised based on the law that is recognized as having practical effect to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights.","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"About the practical effect of the Law\",\"authors\":\"Sung Ho Park\",\"doi\":\"10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As is well known, the rule of law is the principle that power should be exercised based on laws enacted and revised by the legislature. Therefore, the rule of law is a principle that power cannot be arbitrarily exercised or exercised by a person in power, but must be exercised only on the basis of law. In other words, the rule of law is to prevent abuse of power by limiting the arbitrary and subjective exercise of power by requiring the exercise of power to be based on the law. However, opinions are still divided as to why the rule of law is necessary and what it means. The rule of law is a principle to prevent and limit abuse of power by requiring the exercise of power to be based on the law, or guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights by limiting the exercise of power to be based on the law. These various views on the rule of law are related to what the national community wants to achieve through the rule of law. I think that the exercise of power is to prevent abuse of power and to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights by demanding that it be based on the law. In other words, when the exercise of power is arbitrary and subjective by the person in power, it only brings about the expansion of power, but individual freedom and rights are bound to be limited. Therefore, the rule of law should be exercised on the basis of 'law' rather than the subjective will of individuals or power, and infringement of individual freedom and rights by powerful people or power groups should not be recognized without the basis of law. However, given that the law is enacted by the power group and reflects the subjective will of the power group, it is problematic to call it the rule of law if the exercise of power is based on the law. This is because if power is exercised based on the law only by the arbitrary and subjective will of the powerful person or the power group, it can be reduced to a tool that can suppress individual freedom and rights. In other words, if power is exercised based on laws only for power people or power purposes, it can mean the expansion of power, not the restriction and abuse of power. Therefore, if the purpose of the rule of law is to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights, the law for the rule of law should be recognized only when power is exercised based on the law that is recognized as having practical effect to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,法治是指权力的行使应依据立法机关制定和修改的法律。因此,法治是一种权力不能由当权者任意行使或行使,而只能在法律的基础上行使的原则。换句话说,法治就是通过限制权力的任意和主观行使,要求权力的行使必须以法律为基础,从而防止权力的滥用。但是,对于法治的必要性和意义,人们的意见仍然存在分歧。法治是通过要求权力的行使以法律为依据来防止和限制权力的滥用,或者通过限制权力的行使以法律为依据来保障和保护个人的自由和权利的原则。这些不同的法治观与国家共同体希望通过法治实现的目标有关。我认为权力的行使是为了防止权力的滥用,通过要求以法律为基础来保障和保护个人的自由和权利。换句话说,当权力的行使是掌权者的专断和主观时,只会带来权力的扩张,而个人的自由和权利必然受到限制。因此,法治应该建立在“法”的基础上,而不是建立在个人的主观意志或权力的基础上,没有法律的基础,就不能承认有权势的人或权力集团侵犯个人的自由和权利。但是,法律是权力集团制定的,反映了权力集团的主观意志,如果权力的行使以法律为基础,就不能称之为法治。这是因为,如果权力的行使仅仅是基于权力者或权力集团的专断和主观意志,那么权力就会沦为压制个人自由和权利的工具。换句话说,如果权力只是为了权力人或权力目的而根据法律行使,那就意味着权力的扩张,而不是对权力的限制和滥用。因此,如果法治的目的是保障和保护个人的自由和权利,那么只有当权力的行使基于被认为对保障和保护个人的自由和权利具有实际作用的法律时,法治的法律才应该被承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
About the practical effect of the Law
As is well known, the rule of law is the principle that power should be exercised based on laws enacted and revised by the legislature. Therefore, the rule of law is a principle that power cannot be arbitrarily exercised or exercised by a person in power, but must be exercised only on the basis of law. In other words, the rule of law is to prevent abuse of power by limiting the arbitrary and subjective exercise of power by requiring the exercise of power to be based on the law. However, opinions are still divided as to why the rule of law is necessary and what it means. The rule of law is a principle to prevent and limit abuse of power by requiring the exercise of power to be based on the law, or guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights by limiting the exercise of power to be based on the law. These various views on the rule of law are related to what the national community wants to achieve through the rule of law. I think that the exercise of power is to prevent abuse of power and to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights by demanding that it be based on the law. In other words, when the exercise of power is arbitrary and subjective by the person in power, it only brings about the expansion of power, but individual freedom and rights are bound to be limited. Therefore, the rule of law should be exercised on the basis of 'law' rather than the subjective will of individuals or power, and infringement of individual freedom and rights by powerful people or power groups should not be recognized without the basis of law. However, given that the law is enacted by the power group and reflects the subjective will of the power group, it is problematic to call it the rule of law if the exercise of power is based on the law. This is because if power is exercised based on the law only by the arbitrary and subjective will of the powerful person or the power group, it can be reduced to a tool that can suppress individual freedom and rights. In other words, if power is exercised based on laws only for power people or power purposes, it can mean the expansion of power, not the restriction and abuse of power. Therefore, if the purpose of the rule of law is to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights, the law for the rule of law should be recognized only when power is exercised based on the law that is recognized as having practical effect to guarantee and protect individuals' freedom and rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The explanation of medical practice according to the Article 24-2 of the Medical Act does a protect the patient's right to self-determination? A Study on the Introduction of AI Robot Tax Analysis of Supreme Court precedents related to application period under administrative statutes and legal implications: Focusing on the Supreme Court 2021.3.18. announcement 2018Du47264 en banc decision A Study on effectiveness of the Serious Accident Punishment Act A Study on the Legal Issues of the South-North Equity Joint Venture Enterprise in Kaesong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1