使用两种不同的压敏涂料测量跨声速流中的振荡激波*(*基于钌的阳极氧化铝与基于pt的屏蔽层)

W. Beck, C. Klein, U. Henne, M. Merienne, Y. Le Sant, P. Molton
{"title":"使用两种不同的压敏涂料测量跨声速流中的振荡激波*(*基于钌的阳极氧化铝与基于pt的屏蔽层)","authors":"W. Beck, C. Klein, U. Henne, M. Merienne, Y. Le Sant, P. Molton","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-3316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of two different PSP used at DLR and ONERA is compared by carrying out bench mark testing using the oft-studied configuration of an oscillating shock wave (up to 100 Hz) on a bump in the Mach 1.4 flow of the ONERA S8Ch wind tunnel. The shock is made to oscillate by rotating a cam with elliptical cross section, placed at a further downstream position, at frequencies of 15, 30 and 50 Hz. Both paint types are well known and much has been published on their use: the ONERA PSP is a Ruthenium complex Ru(dpp)_3Cl_2 placed as a thin layer on an anodized aluminum substrate, while the DLR PSP is a Platinum complex PtTFPP on a base coating containing TiO_2 particles. S8 run conditions were held constant, and separate test run series were carried out with each paint. Instationary calibration was also carried out using a special test rig. Fourier analyses of the PSP results in S8 enabled a semi-quantitative comparison of the time response of both paints. This is the first published attempt (to the authors’ knowledge) of carrying out a side-by-side comparison of the characteristics of these two paints on such a flow configuration in a wind tunnel. Particular emphasis is placed on their handling properties and, above all, their time responses.","PeriodicalId":373890,"journal":{"name":"2018 Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of an Oscillating Shock Wave in a Transonic Flow Using Two Different Pressure Sensitive Paints* (*Ru-based on anodized aluminum vs. Pt-based with screen layer)\",\"authors\":\"W. Beck, C. Klein, U. Henne, M. Merienne, Y. Le Sant, P. Molton\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/6.2018-3316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of two different PSP used at DLR and ONERA is compared by carrying out bench mark testing using the oft-studied configuration of an oscillating shock wave (up to 100 Hz) on a bump in the Mach 1.4 flow of the ONERA S8Ch wind tunnel. The shock is made to oscillate by rotating a cam with elliptical cross section, placed at a further downstream position, at frequencies of 15, 30 and 50 Hz. Both paint types are well known and much has been published on their use: the ONERA PSP is a Ruthenium complex Ru(dpp)_3Cl_2 placed as a thin layer on an anodized aluminum substrate, while the DLR PSP is a Platinum complex PtTFPP on a base coating containing TiO_2 particles. S8 run conditions were held constant, and separate test run series were carried out with each paint. Instationary calibration was also carried out using a special test rig. Fourier analyses of the PSP results in S8 enabled a semi-quantitative comparison of the time response of both paints. This is the first published attempt (to the authors’ knowledge) of carrying out a side-by-side comparison of the characteristics of these two paints on such a flow configuration in a wind tunnel. Particular emphasis is placed on their handling properties and, above all, their time responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过在ONERA S8Ch风洞的1.4马赫流的碰撞上使用振荡激波(高达100 Hz)进行基准测试,比较了DLR和ONERA使用的两种不同的PSP的性能。通过旋转放置在下游位置的椭圆横截面凸轮,以15、30和50 Hz的频率使冲击振荡。这两种涂料类型都是众所周知的,并且已经发表了许多关于它们的使用:ONERA PSP是钌络合物Ru(dpp)_3Cl_2作为一层薄层放置在阳极化铝基板上,而DLR PSP是铂络合物PtTFPP在含有TiO_2颗粒的基涂层上。保持S8运行条件不变,对每种涂料进行单独的试运行系列。利用专用的试验台进行了安装校准。S8中PSP结果的傅里叶分析使两种涂料的时间响应的半定量比较成为可能。这是首次发表的(据作者所知)对这两种涂料在风洞中这种流动结构上的特性进行并排比较的尝试。特别强调的是它们的处理特性,最重要的是它们的时间响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement of an Oscillating Shock Wave in a Transonic Flow Using Two Different Pressure Sensitive Paints* (*Ru-based on anodized aluminum vs. Pt-based with screen layer)
The performance of two different PSP used at DLR and ONERA is compared by carrying out bench mark testing using the oft-studied configuration of an oscillating shock wave (up to 100 Hz) on a bump in the Mach 1.4 flow of the ONERA S8Ch wind tunnel. The shock is made to oscillate by rotating a cam with elliptical cross section, placed at a further downstream position, at frequencies of 15, 30 and 50 Hz. Both paint types are well known and much has been published on their use: the ONERA PSP is a Ruthenium complex Ru(dpp)_3Cl_2 placed as a thin layer on an anodized aluminum substrate, while the DLR PSP is a Platinum complex PtTFPP on a base coating containing TiO_2 particles. S8 run conditions were held constant, and separate test run series were carried out with each paint. Instationary calibration was also carried out using a special test rig. Fourier analyses of the PSP results in S8 enabled a semi-quantitative comparison of the time response of both paints. This is the first published attempt (to the authors’ knowledge) of carrying out a side-by-side comparison of the characteristics of these two paints on such a flow configuration in a wind tunnel. Particular emphasis is placed on their handling properties and, above all, their time responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison of PSP and TSP Measurement Techniques for Fast Rotating Blades Correction: Extended Model for Dynamic Depletion and Test Section Conditions for a Blow-Down Hypersonic Wind Tunnel Correction: Stereovision Based Determination of Aerodynamic Coefficients for a Wind Tunnel Model in Free Rotational Motion Correction: Design of Conventional and Detonation-Driven Hypervelocity Expansion Tubes Correction: Nitric Oxide Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence Thermometry Measurements in a Hypersonic Boundary Layer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1