垃圾邮件分类领域中多种机器学习算法准确率的比较与分析

liu junchen
{"title":"垃圾邮件分类领域中多种机器学习算法准确率的比较与分析","authors":"liu junchen","doi":"10.1117/12.2675259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the continuous advancement of science and technology, network data dissemination technology has been rapidly developed, but at the same time, the problem of spam is becoming more and more serious. This paper aims to analyse the classification principle of each machine learning classifier and compare the differences in the classification effect of each classifier. For the classification of spam, this paper mainly does the following aspects of the work: first, the selection of mail datasets and the pre-processing of email text information, the second is the extraction of the text characteristics of the email, The data is then divided into two parts, one for training and one for testing, using each machine to train the model, using the test set to test the model. Finally, parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are calculated according to the mail classification results, comparing each model. The results show that the best classification effect is the neural network model and the naïve Bayes model, which can obtain better generalization ability in the test data and should be applied more in practice.","PeriodicalId":380630,"journal":{"name":"Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA 2022)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and analysis of the accuracy of multiple machine learning algorithms in the field of spam classification\",\"authors\":\"liu junchen\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2675259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the continuous advancement of science and technology, network data dissemination technology has been rapidly developed, but at the same time, the problem of spam is becoming more and more serious. This paper aims to analyse the classification principle of each machine learning classifier and compare the differences in the classification effect of each classifier. For the classification of spam, this paper mainly does the following aspects of the work: first, the selection of mail datasets and the pre-processing of email text information, the second is the extraction of the text characteristics of the email, The data is then divided into two parts, one for training and one for testing, using each machine to train the model, using the test set to test the model. Finally, parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are calculated according to the mail classification results, comparing each model. The results show that the best classification effect is the neural network model and the naïve Bayes model, which can obtain better generalization ability in the test data and should be applied more in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA 2022)\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA 2022)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2675259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2675259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison and analysis of the accuracy of multiple machine learning algorithms in the field of spam classification
With the continuous advancement of science and technology, network data dissemination technology has been rapidly developed, but at the same time, the problem of spam is becoming more and more serious. This paper aims to analyse the classification principle of each machine learning classifier and compare the differences in the classification effect of each classifier. For the classification of spam, this paper mainly does the following aspects of the work: first, the selection of mail datasets and the pre-processing of email text information, the second is the extraction of the text characteristics of the email, The data is then divided into two parts, one for training and one for testing, using each machine to train the model, using the test set to test the model. Finally, parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are calculated according to the mail classification results, comparing each model. The results show that the best classification effect is the neural network model and the naïve Bayes model, which can obtain better generalization ability in the test data and should be applied more in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and optimization of ORB-SLAM2 algorithm based on ROS on mobile robots (Erratum) Soldier identification based on improved YOLOv5 algorithm in battlefield environment Front Matter: Volume 12636 Comparison and analysis of the accuracy of multiple machine learning algorithms in the field of spam classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1