西班牙银行治理机制:所有权重要吗?

Rafel Crespí-Cladera, Miguel García-Cestona, V. Salas-Fumás
{"title":"西班牙银行治理机制:所有权重要吗?","authors":"Rafel Crespí-Cladera, Miguel García-Cestona, V. Salas-Fumás","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.380580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the governance of Spanish banks around two main issues. First, does poor economic performance activate governance interventions that favor the removal of executive directors and the merger of non-performing banks? And second, does the relationship between governance intervention and economic performance vary with the ownership form of the bank? We find a negative relationship between performance and governance intervention for banks, but the results change for each form of ownership and each type of intervention. Internal control mechanisms work for Independent Commercial banks, but Savings banks show weaker internal mechanisms of control and the only significant relationship between performance and governance intervention that appears is for mergers. The Spanish Savings banks, with a peculiar form of ownership that, in fact,implies a lack of ownership, give voice to several stakeholder groups with no clear allocation of property rights. Nevertheless, their economic performance is not generally affected. Product-market competition compensates for those weaker internal governance mechanisms and non-performing banks are not fully protected from disappearing.","PeriodicalId":423843,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"197","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance Mechanisms in Spanish Banks: Does Ownership Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Rafel Crespí-Cladera, Miguel García-Cestona, V. Salas-Fumás\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.380580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the governance of Spanish banks around two main issues. First, does poor economic performance activate governance interventions that favor the removal of executive directors and the merger of non-performing banks? And second, does the relationship between governance intervention and economic performance vary with the ownership form of the bank? We find a negative relationship between performance and governance intervention for banks, but the results change for each form of ownership and each type of intervention. Internal control mechanisms work for Independent Commercial banks, but Savings banks show weaker internal mechanisms of control and the only significant relationship between performance and governance intervention that appears is for mergers. The Spanish Savings banks, with a peculiar form of ownership that, in fact,implies a lack of ownership, give voice to several stakeholder groups with no clear allocation of property rights. Nevertheless, their economic performance is not generally affected. Product-market competition compensates for those weaker internal governance mechanisms and non-performing banks are not fully protected from disappearing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"197\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.380580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.380580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 197

摘要

本文围绕两个主要问题考察了西班牙银行的治理。首先,糟糕的经济表现是否会激活有利于罢免执行董事和合并不良银行的治理干预措施?第二,治理干预与经济绩效的关系是否随银行所有权形式的不同而不同?我们发现银行绩效与治理干预之间存在负相关关系,但结果因不同的所有权形式和干预类型而异。内部控制机制对独立商业银行起作用,但储蓄银行的内部控制机制较弱,唯一出现的绩效与治理干预之间的显著关系是合并。西班牙储蓄银行拥有一种特殊的所有权形式,实际上意味着缺乏所有权,它让几个没有明确产权分配的利益相关者群体发表了意见。然而,它们的经济表现总体上没有受到影响。产品市场竞争弥补了内部治理机制薄弱的缺陷,不良银行无法完全免于消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Governance Mechanisms in Spanish Banks: Does Ownership Matter?
This paper examines the governance of Spanish banks around two main issues. First, does poor economic performance activate governance interventions that favor the removal of executive directors and the merger of non-performing banks? And second, does the relationship between governance intervention and economic performance vary with the ownership form of the bank? We find a negative relationship between performance and governance intervention for banks, but the results change for each form of ownership and each type of intervention. Internal control mechanisms work for Independent Commercial banks, but Savings banks show weaker internal mechanisms of control and the only significant relationship between performance and governance intervention that appears is for mergers. The Spanish Savings banks, with a peculiar form of ownership that, in fact,implies a lack of ownership, give voice to several stakeholder groups with no clear allocation of property rights. Nevertheless, their economic performance is not generally affected. Product-market competition compensates for those weaker internal governance mechanisms and non-performing banks are not fully protected from disappearing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do They Do It For The Money? Do Country Level Investor Protections Impact Security Level Contract Design? Evidence from Foreign Bond Covenants Innovation Activities and Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence on the Behaviour of Firms in the New EU Member States and Candidate Countries Directors' Duties Under the UK Companies Act 2006 and the Impact of the Company's Operations on the Environment Compensation Consultants and CEO Pay: UK Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1