{"title":"作者对非真实感图像的主观评价","authors":"D. Mould","doi":"10.1145/2630397.2630400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue in favor of a systematic subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images. Objective measurements are hard to design, and quantitative user studies are problematic for a multiplicity of reasons. Subjective evaluations are not quantitative but are faster to conduct and offer the chance to dig into subtleties that are obscured by numerical scores. By carefully laying out the important elements of the intended image style, and then evaluating their results according to their adherence to the style, researchers can produce convincing evaluations with a manageable level of effort.","PeriodicalId":204343,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authorial subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images\",\"authors\":\"D. Mould\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2630397.2630400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I argue in favor of a systematic subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images. Objective measurements are hard to design, and quantitative user studies are problematic for a multiplicity of reasons. Subjective evaluations are not quantitative but are faster to conduct and offer the chance to dig into subtleties that are obscured by numerical scores. By carefully laying out the important elements of the intended image style, and then evaluating their results according to their adherence to the style, researchers can produce convincing evaluations with a manageable level of effort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2630397.2630400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2630397.2630400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Authorial subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images
I argue in favor of a systematic subjective evaluation of non-photorealistic images. Objective measurements are hard to design, and quantitative user studies are problematic for a multiplicity of reasons. Subjective evaluations are not quantitative but are faster to conduct and offer the chance to dig into subtleties that are obscured by numerical scores. By carefully laying out the important elements of the intended image style, and then evaluating their results according to their adherence to the style, researchers can produce convincing evaluations with a manageable level of effort.