个人生产者责任:对WEEE指令实施个人生产者责任的实际方法的回顾

A. Atasu, R. Lifset, J. Linnell, Jonathan Perry, Viktor Sundberg, C. Mayers, M. Dempsey, L. V. Van Wassenhove, Chris van Rossem, J. Gregory, Anders Sverkman, M. Therkelsen, H. Kalimo
{"title":"个人生产者责任:对WEEE指令实施个人生产者责任的实际方法的回顾","authors":"A. Atasu, R. Lifset, J. Linnell, Jonathan Perry, Viktor Sundberg, C. Mayers, M. Dempsey, L. V. Van Wassenhove, Chris van Rossem, J. Gregory, Anders Sverkman, M. Therkelsen, H. Kalimo","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1698695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report documents the interim findings of the INSEAD IPR Network in relation to investigating practical solutions enabling implementation of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR) for the WEEE Directive. The INSEAD IPR Network is a partnership of producers, academics and technical specialists from across the world working to identify, explore and develop practical solutions to IPR. The network is a project co-ordinated by the International graduate business school, INSEAD. Members and authors of this report are listed in Appendix 1. Article 8.2 of the European WEEE (Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment) Directive establishes individual producer responsibility for the recycling of products put on the market after 13 August 2005. Making each producer responsible for financing the end-of-life costs of their own products is intended to enable end-of-life costs to be fed back to each individual producer. By modifications to the product design, the producer can directly influence the end of life cost. Without Individual Producer Responsibility these incentives for design improvements are lost. This report demonstrates that there are already a range of approaches to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) that have been implemented across the world; many of which attempt to account to a greater or lesser degree for the products and brands of each producer. Oekopol (2007) already noted the development of such approaches, in contrast to the more prevalent collective market-share based implementations (Collective Producer Responsibility – or CPR). In their recent report to the European Commission, Oekopol stated: ‘The alternatives are, in light of on-going efforts of producers, highly feasible.’","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Producer Responsibility: A Review of Practical Approaches to Implementing Individual Producer Responsibility for the WEEE Directive\",\"authors\":\"A. Atasu, R. Lifset, J. Linnell, Jonathan Perry, Viktor Sundberg, C. Mayers, M. Dempsey, L. V. Van Wassenhove, Chris van Rossem, J. Gregory, Anders Sverkman, M. Therkelsen, H. Kalimo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1698695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report documents the interim findings of the INSEAD IPR Network in relation to investigating practical solutions enabling implementation of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR) for the WEEE Directive. The INSEAD IPR Network is a partnership of producers, academics and technical specialists from across the world working to identify, explore and develop practical solutions to IPR. The network is a project co-ordinated by the International graduate business school, INSEAD. Members and authors of this report are listed in Appendix 1. Article 8.2 of the European WEEE (Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment) Directive establishes individual producer responsibility for the recycling of products put on the market after 13 August 2005. Making each producer responsible for financing the end-of-life costs of their own products is intended to enable end-of-life costs to be fed back to each individual producer. By modifications to the product design, the producer can directly influence the end of life cost. Without Individual Producer Responsibility these incentives for design improvements are lost. This report demonstrates that there are already a range of approaches to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) that have been implemented across the world; many of which attempt to account to a greater or lesser degree for the products and brands of each producer. Oekopol (2007) already noted the development of such approaches, in contrast to the more prevalent collective market-share based implementations (Collective Producer Responsibility – or CPR). In their recent report to the European Commission, Oekopol stated: ‘The alternatives are, in light of on-going efforts of producers, highly feasible.’\",\"PeriodicalId\":122208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INSEAD Working Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INSEAD Working Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1698695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1698695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

本报告记录了欧洲工商管理学院知识产权网络在调查实现WEEE指令个人生产者责任(IPR)的实际解决方案方面的中期调查结果。欧洲工商管理学院知识产权网络是一个由来自世界各地的生产者、学者和技术专家组成的伙伴关系,致力于确定、探索和开发知识产权的实际解决方案。该网络是由国际研究生商学院欧洲工商管理学院(INSEAD)协调的一个项目。本报告的成员和作者列于附录1。欧洲WEEE(来自电气和电子设备的废物)指令第8.2条规定了2005年8月13日之后投放市场的产品的回收责任。让每个生产商负责为自己产品的报废成本融资,目的是使报废成本能够反馈给每个生产商。通过对产品设计的修改,生产者可以直接影响产品的报废成本。如果没有个人生产者责任,这些设计改进的动机就会消失。该报告表明,世界各地已经实施了一系列关于废弃电子电气设备(WEEE)的生产者延伸责任(EPR)的方法;其中许多试图或多或少地解释每个生产商的产品和品牌。Oekopol(2007)已经注意到这种方法的发展,与更普遍的基于集体市场份额的实施(集体生产者责任-或CPR)形成对比。Oekopol在最近提交给欧盟委员会的报告中表示:“考虑到生产商的持续努力,替代方案是非常可行的。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual Producer Responsibility: A Review of Practical Approaches to Implementing Individual Producer Responsibility for the WEEE Directive
This report documents the interim findings of the INSEAD IPR Network in relation to investigating practical solutions enabling implementation of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR) for the WEEE Directive. The INSEAD IPR Network is a partnership of producers, academics and technical specialists from across the world working to identify, explore and develop practical solutions to IPR. The network is a project co-ordinated by the International graduate business school, INSEAD. Members and authors of this report are listed in Appendix 1. Article 8.2 of the European WEEE (Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment) Directive establishes individual producer responsibility for the recycling of products put on the market after 13 August 2005. Making each producer responsible for financing the end-of-life costs of their own products is intended to enable end-of-life costs to be fed back to each individual producer. By modifications to the product design, the producer can directly influence the end of life cost. Without Individual Producer Responsibility these incentives for design improvements are lost. This report demonstrates that there are already a range of approaches to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) that have been implemented across the world; many of which attempt to account to a greater or lesser degree for the products and brands of each producer. Oekopol (2007) already noted the development of such approaches, in contrast to the more prevalent collective market-share based implementations (Collective Producer Responsibility – or CPR). In their recent report to the European Commission, Oekopol stated: ‘The alternatives are, in light of on-going efforts of producers, highly feasible.’
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamics and Gradient Manipulation Mechanism in Entrepreneurial Actions Leading a Board of Directors in The United Kingdom: Indirect Leadership Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance after Opioid Initiation A Study on Construction of an Investment Portfolio Using Fundamental Analysis Explaining the Erosion of Relational Care Continuity: An Empirical Analysis of Primary Care in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1