肱骨近端骨折伴神经损伤的反向全肩关节置换术

Reza Katanbaf, R. M. Greiwe
{"title":"肱骨近端骨折伴神经损伤的反向全肩关节置换术","authors":"Reza Katanbaf, R. M. Greiwe","doi":"10.60118/001c.74033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Axillary nerve dysfunction has been a relative contraindication for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as it implies deltoid dysfunction which is necessary for a successful outcome and to maintain stability. However, most axillary nerve injuries or brachial plexus injuries in the setting of acute fracture or fracture dislocation are temporary neuropraxias. Therefore, RTSA may be a feasible option in the acute setting in patients with associated axillary/brachial plexus injury. The objective of this study is to compare results of RTSA patients with preoperative nerve injuries to patients without nerve injuries at a minimum of 2 years. A retrospective case series of all proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA from 2010 to 2018 by a single surgeon was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with a diagnosis of fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scores, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, range of motion (ROM) as well as complications were obtained at final follow up. A total 29 patients treated with RTSA for fracture-dislocation were identified. Five patients declined to participate in the study, 4 patients died prior to final follow-up, leaving 20 patients in the study group. Two patients were lost to follow-up leaving 18 of 20 patients (90%) with final follow up data. Seven (35%) patients presented with a brachial plexus/axillary nerve injury associated with their fracture. Average follow-up was 5.83 years (range 2-8 years). There were no differences between the two groups regarding age or body mass index (BMI). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) was higher in the group without nerve injury 2.92 +/- 0.28 vs 2.43 +/- 0.53 (P=0.0130). There was no difference in time to surgery after fracture between the 2 groups. At final follow-up, there was no difference between the 2 groups regarding shoulder ROM, ASES or SST scores. No patients experienced surgical complications, however, two patients were still reporting nerve related symptoms at final follow up. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture-dislocation in the acute setting may be a feasible option in patients with concomitant brachial plexus injury.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures with Concomitant Nerve Injury\",\"authors\":\"Reza Katanbaf, R. M. Greiwe\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.74033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Axillary nerve dysfunction has been a relative contraindication for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as it implies deltoid dysfunction which is necessary for a successful outcome and to maintain stability. However, most axillary nerve injuries or brachial plexus injuries in the setting of acute fracture or fracture dislocation are temporary neuropraxias. Therefore, RTSA may be a feasible option in the acute setting in patients with associated axillary/brachial plexus injury. The objective of this study is to compare results of RTSA patients with preoperative nerve injuries to patients without nerve injuries at a minimum of 2 years. A retrospective case series of all proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA from 2010 to 2018 by a single surgeon was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with a diagnosis of fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scores, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, range of motion (ROM) as well as complications were obtained at final follow up. A total 29 patients treated with RTSA for fracture-dislocation were identified. Five patients declined to participate in the study, 4 patients died prior to final follow-up, leaving 20 patients in the study group. Two patients were lost to follow-up leaving 18 of 20 patients (90%) with final follow up data. Seven (35%) patients presented with a brachial plexus/axillary nerve injury associated with their fracture. Average follow-up was 5.83 years (range 2-8 years). There were no differences between the two groups regarding age or body mass index (BMI). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) was higher in the group without nerve injury 2.92 +/- 0.28 vs 2.43 +/- 0.53 (P=0.0130). There was no difference in time to surgery after fracture between the 2 groups. At final follow-up, there was no difference between the 2 groups regarding shoulder ROM, ASES or SST scores. No patients experienced surgical complications, however, two patients were still reporting nerve related symptoms at final follow up. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture-dislocation in the acute setting may be a feasible option in patients with concomitant brachial plexus injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.74033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.74033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腋神经功能障碍一直是逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的相对禁忌症,因为它意味着三角肌功能障碍,而三角肌功能障碍是手术成功和保持稳定性所必需的。然而,在急性骨折或骨折脱位的情况下,大多数腋窝神经损伤或臂丛神经损伤是暂时性的神经失用。因此,RTSA在伴有腋窝/臂丛神经损伤的急性患者中可能是一个可行的选择。本研究的目的是比较术前神经损伤的RTSA患者和至少2年无神经损伤的RTSA患者的结果。回顾性分析了2010年至2018年由一名外科医生接受rTSA治疗的所有肱骨近端骨折病例系列。纳入标准为诊断为肱骨近端骨折脱位的患者。在最后随访时获得美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)评分、简单肩关节测试(SST)评分、活动范围(ROM)以及并发症。29例骨折脱位患者接受RTSA治疗。5例患者拒绝参加研究,4例患者在最终随访前死亡,研究组剩余20例患者。2例患者失访,20例患者中有18例(90%)获得最终随访数据。7例(35%)患者骨折后出现臂丛/腋窝神经损伤。平均随访5.83年(2-8年)。两组在年龄和身体质量指数(BMI)方面没有差异。非神经损伤组ASA评分(2.92 +/- 0.28)高于非神经损伤组(2.43 +/- 0.53)(P=0.0130)。两组患者骨折后手术时间差异无统计学意义。在最后的随访中,两组在肩关节ROM、ASES和SST评分方面没有差异。没有患者出现手术并发症,然而,两名患者在最后随访时仍报告神经相关症状。对于合并臂丛神经损伤的患者,在急性情况下采用反向全肩关节置换术治疗骨折脱位可能是一个可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures with Concomitant Nerve Injury
Axillary nerve dysfunction has been a relative contraindication for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as it implies deltoid dysfunction which is necessary for a successful outcome and to maintain stability. However, most axillary nerve injuries or brachial plexus injuries in the setting of acute fracture or fracture dislocation are temporary neuropraxias. Therefore, RTSA may be a feasible option in the acute setting in patients with associated axillary/brachial plexus injury. The objective of this study is to compare results of RTSA patients with preoperative nerve injuries to patients without nerve injuries at a minimum of 2 years. A retrospective case series of all proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA from 2010 to 2018 by a single surgeon was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with a diagnosis of fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scores, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, range of motion (ROM) as well as complications were obtained at final follow up. A total 29 patients treated with RTSA for fracture-dislocation were identified. Five patients declined to participate in the study, 4 patients died prior to final follow-up, leaving 20 patients in the study group. Two patients were lost to follow-up leaving 18 of 20 patients (90%) with final follow up data. Seven (35%) patients presented with a brachial plexus/axillary nerve injury associated with their fracture. Average follow-up was 5.83 years (range 2-8 years). There were no differences between the two groups regarding age or body mass index (BMI). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) was higher in the group without nerve injury 2.92 +/- 0.28 vs 2.43 +/- 0.53 (P=0.0130). There was no difference in time to surgery after fracture between the 2 groups. At final follow-up, there was no difference between the 2 groups regarding shoulder ROM, ASES or SST scores. No patients experienced surgical complications, however, two patients were still reporting nerve related symptoms at final follow up. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture-dislocation in the acute setting may be a feasible option in patients with concomitant brachial plexus injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“In My Experience…15 Data Points To Better Evaluate Platelet Rich Plasma Kits And Protocols” “In My Experience…Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery” A New Paradigm in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis and Arthroplasty with Dynamic Patient-source Outcome Measures: Comprehensive Clinical Review of the Knee Kinesiography Exam with the KneeKG® System Latarjet Classics: An Analysis of The 50 Most-Cited Articles on The Latarjet Procedure “In My Experience…Medical Device Design & Innovation in Shoulder Replacements”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1