物业及土地

María Paula Saffon
{"title":"物业及土地","authors":"María Paula Saffon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3259298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent Latin American constitutions tend to share two peculiar features: they recognize and protect the collective and inalienable land ownership of ethnic groups to their ancestral lands; they also declare the State’s duty to ensure access to land property to the landless through the allocation of public lands and the expropriation of private ones. Offering a historical account of land property rights in Latin America, I argue that, with the exception of current constitutions, collective and public land rights have tended to be recognized and protected mainly under non-liberal legal systems that foresee plural modalities of property. Under liberal legal systems, in contrast, collective property has been prohibited de jure and often persecuted de facto, seen as an impediment to economic development and private investment. I finally analyze current constitutions as engendering an odd combination of plural modalities of property rights and the promotion of neoliberalism and natural resources exploitation.","PeriodicalId":445990,"journal":{"name":"Protected Lands Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property and Land\",\"authors\":\"María Paula Saffon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3259298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent Latin American constitutions tend to share two peculiar features: they recognize and protect the collective and inalienable land ownership of ethnic groups to their ancestral lands; they also declare the State’s duty to ensure access to land property to the landless through the allocation of public lands and the expropriation of private ones. Offering a historical account of land property rights in Latin America, I argue that, with the exception of current constitutions, collective and public land rights have tended to be recognized and protected mainly under non-liberal legal systems that foresee plural modalities of property. Under liberal legal systems, in contrast, collective property has been prohibited de jure and often persecuted de facto, seen as an impediment to economic development and private investment. I finally analyze current constitutions as engendering an odd combination of plural modalities of property rights and the promotion of neoliberalism and natural resources exploitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protected Lands Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protected Lands Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3259298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protected Lands Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3259298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的拉丁美洲宪法往往有两个特点:它们承认和保护种族群体对其祖传土地的集体和不可剥夺的土地所有权;它们还宣布国家有责任通过分配公共土地和征用私人土地来确保无地者获得土地财产。通过对拉丁美洲土地产权的历史描述,我认为,除了现行宪法之外,集体和公共土地权利往往主要在预见财产多元形式的非自由法律制度下得到承认和保护。相反,在自由的法律制度下,集体财产在法律上是被禁止的,而且往往在事实上受到迫害,被视为经济发展和私人投资的障碍。最后,我分析了当前的宪法,认为它产生了财产权的多种形式的奇怪组合,促进了新自由主义和自然资源的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Property and Land
Recent Latin American constitutions tend to share two peculiar features: they recognize and protect the collective and inalienable land ownership of ethnic groups to their ancestral lands; they also declare the State’s duty to ensure access to land property to the landless through the allocation of public lands and the expropriation of private ones. Offering a historical account of land property rights in Latin America, I argue that, with the exception of current constitutions, collective and public land rights have tended to be recognized and protected mainly under non-liberal legal systems that foresee plural modalities of property. Under liberal legal systems, in contrast, collective property has been prohibited de jure and often persecuted de facto, seen as an impediment to economic development and private investment. I finally analyze current constitutions as engendering an odd combination of plural modalities of property rights and the promotion of neoliberalism and natural resources exploitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Venice from an Ecosystem Services Perspective Covenanting for Nature: A Comparative Study of the Utility and Potential of Conservation Covenants The Logic of State Authority on the Control of Agrarian Resource (Socio-Anthropological and Islamic Perspective) Perverse Incentives and Safe Harbors in the Endangered Species Act: Evidence from Timber Harvests Near Woodpeckers Property and Land
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1