宫颈细胞学质量评估模型,用于筛查试验。

C Quantin, L Dusserre, A M Montaud, C Mottot, J P Feldman
{"title":"宫颈细胞学质量评估模型,用于筛查试验。","authors":"C Quantin,&nbsp;L Dusserre,&nbsp;A M Montaud,&nbsp;C Mottot,&nbsp;J P Feldman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although many reliability studies on cervical cytology have been carried out, measurements of sensitivity and specificity have rarely been made since biopsies are not often performed on patients with a negative smear result. This screening assessment was performed over 3 years, using a database of 230,167 smears from 177,051 women. It would seem that cervical cytology has a high specificity (over 99%) but a relatively low sensitivity (61%). Values for sensitivity (exceeding 95%) and specificity (exceeding 99%) for invasive carcinoma should be regarded as reasonably accurate as all incident cases of symptomatic cervical carcinoma are recorded in the Burgundy register. The sensitivity (57%) for pre-invasive lesions is underestimated while their prevalence is overestimated: the lack of organized screening leads to the loss of prevalent cases. The predictive value of a positive smear is 76% for moderate-severe dysplasia, 85% for in situ carcinoma and over 95% for invasive carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 2","pages":"105-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model for quality assessment in cervical cytology used as a screening test.\",\"authors\":\"C Quantin,&nbsp;L Dusserre,&nbsp;A M Montaud,&nbsp;C Mottot,&nbsp;J P Feldman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although many reliability studies on cervical cytology have been carried out, measurements of sensitivity and specificity have rarely been made since biopsies are not often performed on patients with a negative smear result. This screening assessment was performed over 3 years, using a database of 230,167 smears from 177,051 women. It would seem that cervical cytology has a high specificity (over 99%) but a relatively low sensitivity (61%). Values for sensitivity (exceeding 95%) and specificity (exceeding 99%) for invasive carcinoma should be regarded as reasonably accurate as all incident cases of symptomatic cervical carcinoma are recorded in the Burgundy register. The sensitivity (57%) for pre-invasive lesions is underestimated while their prevalence is overestimated: the lack of organized screening leads to the loss of prevalent cases. The predictive value of a positive smear is 76% for moderate-severe dysplasia, 85% for in situ carcinoma and over 95% for invasive carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"105-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然对宫颈细胞学进行了许多可靠性研究,但很少对敏感性和特异性进行测量,因为对涂片结果阴性的患者通常不进行活组织检查。这项筛查评估在3年内进行,使用了来自177051名妇女的230167份涂片的数据库。宫颈细胞学似乎具有高特异性(99%以上),但相对较低的敏感性(61%)。浸润性癌的敏感性(超过95%)和特异性(超过99%)的值应被认为是合理准确的,因为所有有症状的宫颈癌病例都记录在勃艮第登记册中。侵袭前病变的敏感性(57%)被低估,而其患病率被高估:缺乏有组织的筛查导致流行病例的损失。涂片阳性对中重度非典型增生的预测价值为76%,对原位癌的预测价值为85%,对浸润性癌的预测价值超过95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A model for quality assessment in cervical cytology used as a screening test.

Although many reliability studies on cervical cytology have been carried out, measurements of sensitivity and specificity have rarely been made since biopsies are not often performed on patients with a negative smear result. This screening assessment was performed over 3 years, using a database of 230,167 smears from 177,051 women. It would seem that cervical cytology has a high specificity (over 99%) but a relatively low sensitivity (61%). Values for sensitivity (exceeding 95%) and specificity (exceeding 99%) for invasive carcinoma should be regarded as reasonably accurate as all incident cases of symptomatic cervical carcinoma are recorded in the Burgundy register. The sensitivity (57%) for pre-invasive lesions is underestimated while their prevalence is overestimated: the lack of organized screening leads to the loss of prevalent cases. The predictive value of a positive smear is 76% for moderate-severe dysplasia, 85% for in situ carcinoma and over 95% for invasive carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The current status of autopsies in medical care in the USA. Decrease in the frequency of autopsies in Denmark after the introduction of a new autopsy act. Decreasing autopsy rate in Sweden reflects changing attitudes among clinicians. The meta-autopsy: changing techniques and attitudes towards the autopsy. The reliability of autopsy diagnostics: inter-observer variation between pathologists, a preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1