论查尔斯-桑德斯-皮尔斯 "叙事诗 "概念的思想背景

METOD Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.31249/METOD/2020.10.22
Yulia Koreshkova
{"title":"论查尔斯-桑德斯-皮尔斯 \"叙事诗 \"概念的思想背景","authors":"Yulia Koreshkova","doi":"10.31249/METOD/2020.10.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the main aspects, concepts and categories of Charles Peirce's philosophy in the context of synechism in order to provide an intellectual context to the article «Immortality in the light of synechism». The text is divided into parts devoted to Peirce's biography, synechism and faneroscopy, tihism, abduction and agapism, as well as to how Peirce's conceptual apparatus is currently used in the academic discourse. The article aims to familiarize the reader with the basic concepts of Peirce's philosophical project and to provide an intellectual context for his concept of synechism. The article presents the main biographical facts that can give the most accurate idea of Peirce’s personality, his academic career and of difficulties, associated with the study of his legacy. There are examples of how Peirce's conceptual apparatus is embedded in modern philosophical and methodological discourses. Pierce's synechism and his entire philosophical project show how a rigorous logic and scientific methodology exist in close interconnection with general philosophical problems and methodology. Peirce's scientific discoveries are inseparable from his ontological research. His synechysitic project is inherently such a conceptual apparatus that is designed to overcome the methodological limitations associated with discontinuity and mechanistic approach towards the world: synechism provides a view that would include subject-object relations in scientific knowledge, and would also include the problem of the dependence of the object on the subject not only in philosophy and humanitarian knowledge, but also in social and exact sciences, that is, in those areas where the rigor of the scientific method is welcomed. At the same time, in the context of the Cartesian project revision Peirce's synechism can be considered as a solution to the problem of the interaction of extending matter and non-extending mind. Synechism offers a synthesis between extending matter and mind, since synechism offers the extension and connectedness of both mind and matter. Thus, indirectly, not the abolition of dualism occurs, but a logical transformation that overcomes the opposition. On the other hand, in relation to the problem of mind-body separateness, synechism is a concept that is designed to cancel it, since synechism considers the continuity of everything as its foundation.","PeriodicalId":186078,"journal":{"name":"METOD","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ON THE INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT OF CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE’S CONCEPT OF SYNECHISM\",\"authors\":\"Yulia Koreshkova\",\"doi\":\"10.31249/METOD/2020.10.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the main aspects, concepts and categories of Charles Peirce's philosophy in the context of synechism in order to provide an intellectual context to the article «Immortality in the light of synechism». The text is divided into parts devoted to Peirce's biography, synechism and faneroscopy, tihism, abduction and agapism, as well as to how Peirce's conceptual apparatus is currently used in the academic discourse. The article aims to familiarize the reader with the basic concepts of Peirce's philosophical project and to provide an intellectual context for his concept of synechism. The article presents the main biographical facts that can give the most accurate idea of Peirce’s personality, his academic career and of difficulties, associated with the study of his legacy. There are examples of how Peirce's conceptual apparatus is embedded in modern philosophical and methodological discourses. Pierce's synechism and his entire philosophical project show how a rigorous logic and scientific methodology exist in close interconnection with general philosophical problems and methodology. Peirce's scientific discoveries are inseparable from his ontological research. His synechysitic project is inherently such a conceptual apparatus that is designed to overcome the methodological limitations associated with discontinuity and mechanistic approach towards the world: synechism provides a view that would include subject-object relations in scientific knowledge, and would also include the problem of the dependence of the object on the subject not only in philosophy and humanitarian knowledge, but also in social and exact sciences, that is, in those areas where the rigor of the scientific method is welcomed. At the same time, in the context of the Cartesian project revision Peirce's synechism can be considered as a solution to the problem of the interaction of extending matter and non-extending mind. Synechism offers a synthesis between extending matter and mind, since synechism offers the extension and connectedness of both mind and matter. Thus, indirectly, not the abolition of dualism occurs, but a logical transformation that overcomes the opposition. On the other hand, in relation to the problem of mind-body separateness, synechism is a concept that is designed to cancel it, since synechism considers the continuity of everything as its foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METOD\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METOD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31249/METOD/2020.10.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METOD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31249/METOD/2020.10.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在协同论的背景下讨论了查尔斯·皮尔斯哲学的主要方面、概念和范畴,以便为文章《协同论中的不朽》提供一个知识背景。本文分为几个部分,专门介绍皮尔斯的传记,协同论和faneroscopy, tihism,绑架和agapism,以及皮尔斯的概念工具目前如何在学术话语中使用。本文旨在使读者熟悉皮尔斯哲学计划的基本概念,并为他的协同论概念提供一个思想背景。本文介绍了主要的传记事实,可以最准确地了解皮尔斯的个性、他的学术生涯以及与他的遗产研究有关的困难。皮尔斯的概念工具如何嵌入到现代哲学和方法论的话语中,有很多例子。皮尔斯的协同论和他的整个哲学项目表明,严谨的逻辑和科学的方法论是如何与一般的哲学问题和方法论紧密联系在一起的。皮尔斯的科学发现与他的本体论研究密不可分。他的综合项目本质上就是这样一种概念装置,旨在克服与不连续和机械方法有关的方法局限性:协同论提供了一种观点,它将包括科学知识中的主客体关系,也将包括客体对主体的依赖问题,不仅在哲学和人文主义知识中,而且在社会科学和精确科学中,也就是说,在那些欢迎科学方法严谨性的领域。同时,在笛卡尔项目修正的背景下,皮尔斯的协同机制可以被认为是对可扩展物质与非可扩展精神相互作用问题的一种解决方案。协同提供了扩展物质和精神之间的综合,因为协同提供了精神和物质的延伸和联系。因此,间接地,发生的不是二元论的废除,而是一种克服对立的逻辑转变。另一方面,对于身心分离的问题,协同论是一个旨在消除它的概念,因为协同论认为一切事物的连续性是其基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ON THE INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT OF CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE’S CONCEPT OF SYNECHISM
This article discusses the main aspects, concepts and categories of Charles Peirce's philosophy in the context of synechism in order to provide an intellectual context to the article «Immortality in the light of synechism». The text is divided into parts devoted to Peirce's biography, synechism and faneroscopy, tihism, abduction and agapism, as well as to how Peirce's conceptual apparatus is currently used in the academic discourse. The article aims to familiarize the reader with the basic concepts of Peirce's philosophical project and to provide an intellectual context for his concept of synechism. The article presents the main biographical facts that can give the most accurate idea of Peirce’s personality, his academic career and of difficulties, associated with the study of his legacy. There are examples of how Peirce's conceptual apparatus is embedded in modern philosophical and methodological discourses. Pierce's synechism and his entire philosophical project show how a rigorous logic and scientific methodology exist in close interconnection with general philosophical problems and methodology. Peirce's scientific discoveries are inseparable from his ontological research. His synechysitic project is inherently such a conceptual apparatus that is designed to overcome the methodological limitations associated with discontinuity and mechanistic approach towards the world: synechism provides a view that would include subject-object relations in scientific knowledge, and would also include the problem of the dependence of the object on the subject not only in philosophy and humanitarian knowledge, but also in social and exact sciences, that is, in those areas where the rigor of the scientific method is welcomed. At the same time, in the context of the Cartesian project revision Peirce's synechism can be considered as a solution to the problem of the interaction of extending matter and non-extending mind. Synechism offers a synthesis between extending matter and mind, since synechism offers the extension and connectedness of both mind and matter. Thus, indirectly, not the abolition of dualism occurs, but a logical transformation that overcomes the opposition. On the other hand, in relation to the problem of mind-body separateness, synechism is a concept that is designed to cancel it, since synechism considers the continuity of everything as its foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WHAT IS A SIGN? ON THE WAY TO SEMIOTICALLY RECOGNIZABLE BIOLOGY: BIOSEMIOTICS REPLACE THE SYNTHETIC THEORY OF EVOLUTION METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGE. EXTRA SCIENCE. WHAT DOES THE ERA OF SPECIALIZATION LACK? WHAT CAN FILL THIS LACK? CONVERGENCE OF KNOWLEDGE OF BIOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCES IN THE LIGHT OF "EPIGENETIC EXPANSION" OF EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS BASES OF THE THEORY OF INTERDISCIPLINARY TRANSFER. PRINCIPLE OF TRANSLATION RELATIVITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1