{"title":"神经外科重症监护室经皮扩张性气管切开术与常规气管切开术的安全性和可行性比较","authors":"J. Kwon, Yong Oh Kim, J. Ryu","doi":"10.32587/jnic.2019.00213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 118 patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period. Elective surgery of brain tumor (33.1%) and intracranial hemorrhage (20.3%) were the most common reasons for ICU admission. Prolonged intubation (42.4%) and airway protection or prevent risk of aspiration (25.4%) were the most common reasons for tracheostomy. There was no significant difference in initial success rate of tracheostomy between the two groups (p=0.110). However, procedural time was lengthier in CST than that in PDT (39.0 [30.0–60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0–23.0] min, p<0.001). Procedure-induced complications were more common in patients who underwent CST compared to those in patients who underwent PDT (26.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.039). Although moderate or major bleeding occurred in five patients who underwent CST, only one patient had moderate bleeding in PDT. Especially, there were two respiratory arrests during procedure in CST. In addition, two VAPs and seven wound infections occurred in CST.","PeriodicalId":356321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Performed by a Neurointensivist Compared with Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit\",\"authors\":\"J. Kwon, Yong Oh Kim, J. Ryu\",\"doi\":\"10.32587/jnic.2019.00213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A total of 118 patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period. Elective surgery of brain tumor (33.1%) and intracranial hemorrhage (20.3%) were the most common reasons for ICU admission. Prolonged intubation (42.4%) and airway protection or prevent risk of aspiration (25.4%) were the most common reasons for tracheostomy. There was no significant difference in initial success rate of tracheostomy between the two groups (p=0.110). However, procedural time was lengthier in CST than that in PDT (39.0 [30.0–60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0–23.0] min, p<0.001). Procedure-induced complications were more common in patients who underwent CST compared to those in patients who underwent PDT (26.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.039). Although moderate or major bleeding occurred in five patients who underwent CST, only one patient had moderate bleeding in PDT. Especially, there were two respiratory arrests during procedure in CST. In addition, two VAPs and seven wound infections occurred in CST.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurointensive Care\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurointensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2019.00213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2019.00213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
在研究期间,共有118例患者接受了气管切开术。择期脑肿瘤手术(33.1%)和颅内出血(20.3%)是ICU住院最常见的原因。延长插管时间(42.4%)和保护气道或防止误吸风险(25.4%)是气管切开术最常见的原因。两组气管切开术初始成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.110)。然而,CST的手术时间长于PDT (39.0 [30.0-60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0-23.0] min, p<0.001)。手术引起的并发症在CST患者中比在PDT患者中更常见(26.3%比11.5%,p=0.039)。虽然5例接受CST的患者出现中度或大出血,但只有1例PDT患者出现中度出血。特别是在CST手术过程中,有两次呼吸骤停。此外,CST中发生2例vap和7例伤口感染。
Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Performed by a Neurointensivist Compared with Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit
A total of 118 patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period. Elective surgery of brain tumor (33.1%) and intracranial hemorrhage (20.3%) were the most common reasons for ICU admission. Prolonged intubation (42.4%) and airway protection or prevent risk of aspiration (25.4%) were the most common reasons for tracheostomy. There was no significant difference in initial success rate of tracheostomy between the two groups (p=0.110). However, procedural time was lengthier in CST than that in PDT (39.0 [30.0–60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0–23.0] min, p<0.001). Procedure-induced complications were more common in patients who underwent CST compared to those in patients who underwent PDT (26.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.039). Although moderate or major bleeding occurred in five patients who underwent CST, only one patient had moderate bleeding in PDT. Especially, there were two respiratory arrests during procedure in CST. In addition, two VAPs and seven wound infections occurred in CST.