Apolline Blandin, A. S. Cloots, Hatim Hussain, Michel Rauchs, Rasheed Saleuddin, J. Allen, B. Zhang, Katherine Cloud
{"title":"全球加密资产监管格局研究","authors":"Apolline Blandin, A. S. Cloots, Hatim Hussain, Michel Rauchs, Rasheed Saleuddin, J. Allen, B. Zhang, Katherine Cloud","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3379219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first global comparative study of cryptoasset regulation by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance provides a comprehensive, systematic, and comparative analysis of the current regulatory landscape of cryptoassets and related activities. The study covers 23 jurisdictions and is based on both desktop research and in-person interviews with regulators and policymakers. The report aims to compare and contrast various regulatory approaches and practices with regards to cryptoassets in a number of jurisdictions and shed light on current regulatory challenges and opportunities. The study serves as a practical and analytical tool for regulators, market participants, and other stakeholders in the cryptoasset ecosystem. Section 1 sets out a theoretical framework to conceptualise cryptoassets and related activities. It looks at three key aspects in a regulatory context: (1) the nature and form of cryptoassets, (2) the issuance of cryptoassets, and (3) intermediated activities in the life cycle of cryptoassets. A number of regulatory recommendations are brought forward. Section 2 provides a global comparative analysis of cryptoasset regulation in 23 jurisdictions. It examines regulatory authorities regulating cryptoassets, their current definition and classification of cryptoassets and related activities, as well as regulatory processes and responses (e.g. existing regulation, retrofitted regulation, bespoke regulation and bespoke regulatory regime). Section 3 highlights some of the most salient challenges and potential gaps that stem from the development and implementation of cryptoasset regulation. Section 4 consists of an in-depth analysis of cryptoasset regulations in 23 jurisdictions that constitute the backbone of the comparative analysis.","PeriodicalId":376194,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation & Supervision (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Cryptoasset Regulatory Landscape Study\",\"authors\":\"Apolline Blandin, A. S. Cloots, Hatim Hussain, Michel Rauchs, Rasheed Saleuddin, J. Allen, B. Zhang, Katherine Cloud\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3379219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first global comparative study of cryptoasset regulation by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance provides a comprehensive, systematic, and comparative analysis of the current regulatory landscape of cryptoassets and related activities. The study covers 23 jurisdictions and is based on both desktop research and in-person interviews with regulators and policymakers. The report aims to compare and contrast various regulatory approaches and practices with regards to cryptoassets in a number of jurisdictions and shed light on current regulatory challenges and opportunities. The study serves as a practical and analytical tool for regulators, market participants, and other stakeholders in the cryptoasset ecosystem. Section 1 sets out a theoretical framework to conceptualise cryptoassets and related activities. It looks at three key aspects in a regulatory context: (1) the nature and form of cryptoassets, (2) the issuance of cryptoassets, and (3) intermediated activities in the life cycle of cryptoassets. A number of regulatory recommendations are brought forward. Section 2 provides a global comparative analysis of cryptoasset regulation in 23 jurisdictions. It examines regulatory authorities regulating cryptoassets, their current definition and classification of cryptoassets and related activities, as well as regulatory processes and responses (e.g. existing regulation, retrofitted regulation, bespoke regulation and bespoke regulatory regime). Section 3 highlights some of the most salient challenges and potential gaps that stem from the development and implementation of cryptoasset regulation. Section 4 consists of an in-depth analysis of cryptoasset regulations in 23 jurisdictions that constitute the backbone of the comparative analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Regulation & Supervision (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Regulation & Supervision (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3379219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation & Supervision (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3379219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48
摘要
剑桥替代金融中心(Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance)首次对加密资产监管进行了全球比较研究,对加密资产及相关活动的当前监管格局进行了全面、系统和比较分析。这项研究涵盖了23个司法管辖区,基于桌面研究和对监管机构和政策制定者的亲自采访。该报告旨在比较和对比多个司法管辖区关于加密资产的各种监管方法和做法,并阐明当前的监管挑战和机遇。该研究为监管机构、市场参与者和加密资产生态系统中的其他利益相关者提供了实用和分析工具。第1节提出了一个概念化加密资产和相关活动的理论框架。它着眼于监管背景下的三个关键方面:(1)加密资产的性质和形式,(2)加密资产的发行,以及(3)加密资产生命周期中的中介活动。提出了一些监管建议。第2节对23个司法管辖区的加密资产监管进行了全球比较分析。它审查了监管加密资产的监管机构,其当前对加密资产和相关活动的定义和分类,以及监管流程和响应(例如现有监管、改进监管、定制监管和定制监管制度)。第3节重点介绍了加密资产监管的发展和实施所带来的一些最突出的挑战和潜在差距。第4节包括对23个司法管辖区的加密资产法规的深入分析,这些法规构成了比较分析的支柱。
The first global comparative study of cryptoasset regulation by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance provides a comprehensive, systematic, and comparative analysis of the current regulatory landscape of cryptoassets and related activities. The study covers 23 jurisdictions and is based on both desktop research and in-person interviews with regulators and policymakers. The report aims to compare and contrast various regulatory approaches and practices with regards to cryptoassets in a number of jurisdictions and shed light on current regulatory challenges and opportunities. The study serves as a practical and analytical tool for regulators, market participants, and other stakeholders in the cryptoasset ecosystem. Section 1 sets out a theoretical framework to conceptualise cryptoassets and related activities. It looks at three key aspects in a regulatory context: (1) the nature and form of cryptoassets, (2) the issuance of cryptoassets, and (3) intermediated activities in the life cycle of cryptoassets. A number of regulatory recommendations are brought forward. Section 2 provides a global comparative analysis of cryptoasset regulation in 23 jurisdictions. It examines regulatory authorities regulating cryptoassets, their current definition and classification of cryptoassets and related activities, as well as regulatory processes and responses (e.g. existing regulation, retrofitted regulation, bespoke regulation and bespoke regulatory regime). Section 3 highlights some of the most salient challenges and potential gaps that stem from the development and implementation of cryptoasset regulation. Section 4 consists of an in-depth analysis of cryptoasset regulations in 23 jurisdictions that constitute the backbone of the comparative analysis.