以目标为导向:将组织发展融入多样性、公平性和包容性审计的创建

Kawanna Bright, Nikhat J. Ghouse
{"title":"以目标为导向:将组织发展融入多样性、公平性和包容性审计的创建","authors":"Kawanna Bright, Nikhat J. Ghouse","doi":"10.29242/lac.2018.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Assessing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in US academic libraries is currently a non-standardized process. Often, efforts to assess DEI have focused on counting the number of librarians or staff of color working in the library, an artificial and limited measure that narrowly equates DEI with staffing. In 2012, the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) published a list of “Diversity Standards” that expanded the idea of what DEI entailed in libraries, while also increasing the complexity of measuring DEI.1 ACRL’s “Standards” suggested that, in addition to the diversity of the workforce, DEI competency in libraries also included areas such as delivery of services, organizational dynamics, the development of collections, professional development, and research.2 In a similar vein, the American Library Association (ALA) included DEI as one of eight “Key Action Areas” for the Association.3 While workforce diversity remained prominent within the goals and strategies of this strategic area, there was also recognition of the importance of DEI within LIS education, professional development, and research endeavors.4","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking AIM: Integrating Organization Development into the Creation of a Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Audit\",\"authors\":\"Kawanna Bright, Nikhat J. Ghouse\",\"doi\":\"10.29242/lac.2018.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Assessing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in US academic libraries is currently a non-standardized process. Often, efforts to assess DEI have focused on counting the number of librarians or staff of color working in the library, an artificial and limited measure that narrowly equates DEI with staffing. In 2012, the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) published a list of “Diversity Standards” that expanded the idea of what DEI entailed in libraries, while also increasing the complexity of measuring DEI.1 ACRL’s “Standards” suggested that, in addition to the diversity of the workforce, DEI competency in libraries also included areas such as delivery of services, organizational dynamics, the development of collections, professional development, and research.2 In a similar vein, the American Library Association (ALA) included DEI as one of eight “Key Action Areas” for the Association.3 While workforce diversity remained prominent within the goals and strategies of this strategic area, there was also recognition of the importance of DEI within LIS education, professional development, and research endeavors.4\",\"PeriodicalId\":193553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

评估美国大学图书馆的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)目前是一个非标准化的过程。通常,评估DEI的努力集中在计算图书馆馆员或有色人种工作人员的数量上,这是一种人为的、有限的衡量标准,将DEI与人员配置狭隘地等同起来。2012年,大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)发布了一份“多样性标准”清单,扩大了图书馆DEI的概念,同时也增加了衡量DEI的复杂性。ACRL的“标准”表明,除了劳动力的多样性外,图书馆的DEI能力还包括服务交付、组织动态、馆藏发展、专业发展和研究等领域类似地,美国图书馆协会(ALA)将DEI作为协会的八个“关键行动领域”之一,虽然劳动力多样性在这一战略领域的目标和战略中仍然是突出的,但也认识到DEI在美国图书馆教育、专业发展和研究努力中的重要性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking AIM: Integrating Organization Development into the Creation of a Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Audit
Introduction Assessing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in US academic libraries is currently a non-standardized process. Often, efforts to assess DEI have focused on counting the number of librarians or staff of color working in the library, an artificial and limited measure that narrowly equates DEI with staffing. In 2012, the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) published a list of “Diversity Standards” that expanded the idea of what DEI entailed in libraries, while also increasing the complexity of measuring DEI.1 ACRL’s “Standards” suggested that, in addition to the diversity of the workforce, DEI competency in libraries also included areas such as delivery of services, organizational dynamics, the development of collections, professional development, and research.2 In a similar vein, the American Library Association (ALA) included DEI as one of eight “Key Action Areas” for the Association.3 While workforce diversity remained prominent within the goals and strategies of this strategic area, there was also recognition of the importance of DEI within LIS education, professional development, and research endeavors.4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Library Design: How Many Seats Do We Need? Engaging Graduate Students in Research and Scholarly Life Cycle Practices: Localized Modeling of Scholarly Communication for Alignment with Strategic Initiatives Reflections on Creating a Multi-Site, Mixed Methods, and Interpretive Assessment Project Choose Your Adventure: A Library Reorganization Case Study Collecting Globally, Connecting Locally: 21st Century Libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1