{"title":"自动化评估:我们有多自信?","authors":"J. Allan, Tony Allen, N. Sherkat","doi":"10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper highlights the research issues associated with the automated assessment of handwritten scripts and introduces the theoretical scoring confidence. Using this concept, in a 3 word response environment, we prove that it is theoretically possible to achieve a scoring confidence greater than 98% using recognition rates as low as 81% to produce actual response yields of 50%. These results are verified by experiment.","PeriodicalId":114017,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated assessment: how confident are we?\",\"authors\":\"J. Allan, Tony Allen, N. Sherkat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper highlights the research issues associated with the automated assessment of handwritten scripts and introduces the theoretical scoring confidence. Using this concept, in a 3 word response environment, we prove that it is theoretically possible to achieve a scoring confidence greater than 98% using recognition rates as low as 81% to produce actual response yields of 50%. These results are verified by experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper highlights the research issues associated with the automated assessment of handwritten scripts and introduces the theoretical scoring confidence. Using this concept, in a 3 word response environment, we prove that it is theoretically possible to achieve a scoring confidence greater than 98% using recognition rates as low as 81% to produce actual response yields of 50%. These results are verified by experiment.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
