质证权得不到保障的陈述证据的可采性——违法性的依据与效力——最高法院2022年3月17日2016年第17054号判决案例分析

{"title":"质证权得不到保障的陈述证据的可采性——违法性的依据与效力——最高法院2022年3月17日2016年第17054号判决案例分析","authors":"Jieun Cho","doi":"10.56458/yulj.2023.56.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":211293,"journal":{"name":"Yeungnam University Law Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Admissibility of evidence of statements in which the right tocross-examine is not guaranteed - the basis and effect of illegality- Case analysis on Supreme Court decision 2016 Do 17054on March 17, 2022 -\",\"authors\":\"Jieun Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.56458/yulj.2023.56.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":211293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeungnam University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeungnam University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56458/yulj.2023.56.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeungnam University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56458/yulj.2023.56.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}