关于马来西亚农业部门商业预期合理性的调查证据

S. Wong, Chin-Hong Puah, Shazali Abu Mansor
{"title":"关于马来西亚农业部门商业预期合理性的调查证据","authors":"S. Wong, Chin-Hong Puah, Shazali Abu Mansor","doi":"10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rational expectations hypothesis (REH) serves as an appealing mechanism in forming expectations because of its consistency with the basic principles of maximizing behavior. The present study intends to provide empirical support of forecast rationality in the context of survey-based business expectations, particularly in agriculture-based entities in Malaysia. Three rationality tests which include unbiasedness test, non-serial correlation test and weak form efficiency test have been utilized in the study. Empirical findings showed diverse evidence of rationality in business operational forecasts formed by Malaysian agriculture firms, as capital expenditure expectations were found to be irrational but gross revenue expectations were supportive of the REH proposition. This implies that the survey of business forecasts may not work well in reflecting the true business outlook, specifically in value-related operational forecasts, which in turn would directly influence investment decisions as well as the capital budgeting process.","PeriodicalId":358440,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey evidence on the rationality of business expectations on Malaysian agricultural sector\",\"authors\":\"S. Wong, Chin-Hong Puah, Shazali Abu Mansor\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rational expectations hypothesis (REH) serves as an appealing mechanism in forming expectations because of its consistency with the basic principles of maximizing behavior. The present study intends to provide empirical support of forecast rationality in the context of survey-based business expectations, particularly in agriculture-based entities in Malaysia. Three rationality tests which include unbiasedness test, non-serial correlation test and weak form efficiency test have been utilized in the study. Empirical findings showed diverse evidence of rationality in business operational forecasts formed by Malaysian agriculture firms, as capital expenditure expectations were found to be irrational but gross revenue expectations were supportive of the REH proposition. This implies that the survey of business forecasts may not work well in reflecting the true business outlook, specifically in value-related operational forecasts, which in turn would directly influence investment decisions as well as the capital budgeting process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA)\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理性预期假说符合行为最大化的基本原则,是形成预期的一种吸引机制。本研究旨在为基于调查的商业预期提供预测合理性的实证支持,特别是在马来西亚的农业实体。研究采用了无偏性检验、非序列相关检验和弱形式效率检验三种合理性检验。实证研究结果显示,马来西亚农业公司形成的业务运营预测有多种合理性证据,因为资本支出预期被发现是非理性的,但总收入预期支持REH主张。这意味着对商业预测的调查可能不能很好地反映真实的商业前景,特别是在与价值相关的业务预测方面,这反过来又会直接影响投资决策以及资本预算过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survey evidence on the rationality of business expectations on Malaysian agricultural sector
The rational expectations hypothesis (REH) serves as an appealing mechanism in forming expectations because of its consistency with the basic principles of maximizing behavior. The present study intends to provide empirical support of forecast rationality in the context of survey-based business expectations, particularly in agriculture-based entities in Malaysia. Three rationality tests which include unbiasedness test, non-serial correlation test and weak form efficiency test have been utilized in the study. Empirical findings showed diverse evidence of rationality in business operational forecasts formed by Malaysian agriculture firms, as capital expenditure expectations were found to be irrational but gross revenue expectations were supportive of the REH proposition. This implies that the survey of business forecasts may not work well in reflecting the true business outlook, specifically in value-related operational forecasts, which in turn would directly influence investment decisions as well as the capital budgeting process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An integrated approach of analysing a production system's PMS: A case study A conceptual paper for human capital in the logistics industry in Malaysia Monitoring visitor impacts in Imbak Canyon Conservation Area, Sabah, Malaysia Buildability problems in the Malaysian building construction The impact of subprime mortgage crisis on the short-run and long-run volatility components of the Malaysian stock market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1