现有证据

Adam Chilton, Mila Versteeg
{"title":"现有证据","authors":"Adam Chilton, Mila Versteeg","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190871451.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews the existing body of evidence on constitutional rights effectiveness. Although the debate over whether constitutional rights change government behavior extends back at least to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, there is remarkably little empirical research that focuses specifically on this question. However, there are several academic literatures that are relevant to the topic. Because most legal scholars operate under the assumption that rights matter, it begins by very briefly reviewing some of the normative arguments for including rights. It then proceeds to discuss existing qualitative and quantitative studies on rights effectiveness. Finally, it discusses some of the core findings from a related literature on human rights treaty effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":230562,"journal":{"name":"How Constitutional Rights Matter","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Existing Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Adam Chilton, Mila Versteeg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190871451.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reviews the existing body of evidence on constitutional rights effectiveness. Although the debate over whether constitutional rights change government behavior extends back at least to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, there is remarkably little empirical research that focuses specifically on this question. However, there are several academic literatures that are relevant to the topic. Because most legal scholars operate under the assumption that rights matter, it begins by very briefly reviewing some of the normative arguments for including rights. It then proceeds to discuss existing qualitative and quantitative studies on rights effectiveness. Finally, it discusses some of the core findings from a related literature on human rights treaty effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"How Constitutional Rights Matter\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"How Constitutional Rights Matter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190871451.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How Constitutional Rights Matter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190871451.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章回顾了现有的关于宪法权利效力的证据。尽管关于宪法权利是否会改变政府行为的争论至少可以追溯到托马斯·杰斐逊和詹姆斯·麦迪逊,但很少有实证研究专门关注这个问题。然而,有一些学术文献与该主题相关。因为大多数法律学者都是在权利很重要的假设下运作的,所以本文首先非常简要地回顾了一些关于包括权利的规范性论点。然后讨论现有的关于权利有效性的定性和定量研究。最后,讨论了人权条约有效性相关文献中的一些核心结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Existing Evidence
This chapter reviews the existing body of evidence on constitutional rights effectiveness. Although the debate over whether constitutional rights change government behavior extends back at least to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, there is remarkably little empirical research that focuses specifically on this question. However, there are several academic literatures that are relevant to the topic. Because most legal scholars operate under the assumption that rights matter, it begins by very briefly reviewing some of the normative arguments for including rights. It then proceeds to discuss existing qualitative and quantitative studies on rights effectiveness. Finally, it discusses some of the core findings from a related literature on human rights treaty effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Civil and Political Rights Research Methods Social Rights Existing Evidence Conclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1