带沥青和天花板保温的自然通风试验建筑的热工性能

F. Morris, A. Z. Ahmed, N. Zakaria
{"title":"带沥青和天花板保温的自然通风试验建筑的热工性能","authors":"F. Morris, A. Z. Ahmed, N. Zakaria","doi":"10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field study was carried out to evaluate the benefits of insulated roof and insulated ceiling for naturally ventilated buildings in Malaysia. Two identical test cells with dimensions of 4m × 4m × 3m were used as building samples. Both test cells have identical design and were constructed with conventional building envelope. The non-insulated control unit is named as Test Cell A (TCA) while the insulated test unit is named as Test Cell B (TCB). Conductive thermal insulation of R-value 2.22 (m2K/W) and 2.88 (m2K/W) was consecutively installed at the roof pitch and internal ceiling respectively. For each insulation configuration, the outdoor and indoor environmental data for both test cells were concurrently monitored using automated data logging equipments. Data logging duration was five days for roof pitch insulation and ten days for ceiling insulation. This paper presents the findings on thermal impact on the non-insulated Test Cell A and insulated Test Cell B. These are appraised by the respective indoor temperature. The finding shows that pitch insulation and ceiling insulation lower the daytime indoor temperature up to 0.8°C and 0.6°C respectively. However, both have adverse impact at night. It is concluded that both pitch and ceiling insulations are beneficial to reduce the day-time thermal impact. The impact is more significant with the pitch insulation. Due to the nominal temperature differential to determine the benefits on the thermal comfort conditions, a cooling load analyses could further substantiate the advantage and disadvantage of the insulation.","PeriodicalId":105476,"journal":{"name":"2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal performance of naturally ventilated test building with pitch and ceiling insulation\",\"authors\":\"F. Morris, A. Z. Ahmed, N. Zakaria\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A field study was carried out to evaluate the benefits of insulated roof and insulated ceiling for naturally ventilated buildings in Malaysia. Two identical test cells with dimensions of 4m × 4m × 3m were used as building samples. Both test cells have identical design and were constructed with conventional building envelope. The non-insulated control unit is named as Test Cell A (TCA) while the insulated test unit is named as Test Cell B (TCB). Conductive thermal insulation of R-value 2.22 (m2K/W) and 2.88 (m2K/W) was consecutively installed at the roof pitch and internal ceiling respectively. For each insulation configuration, the outdoor and indoor environmental data for both test cells were concurrently monitored using automated data logging equipments. Data logging duration was five days for roof pitch insulation and ten days for ceiling insulation. This paper presents the findings on thermal impact on the non-insulated Test Cell A and insulated Test Cell B. These are appraised by the respective indoor temperature. The finding shows that pitch insulation and ceiling insulation lower the daytime indoor temperature up to 0.8°C and 0.6°C respectively. However, both have adverse impact at night. It is concluded that both pitch and ceiling insulations are beneficial to reduce the day-time thermal impact. The impact is more significant with the pitch insulation. Due to the nominal temperature differential to determine the benefits on the thermal comfort conditions, a cooling load analyses could further substantiate the advantage and disadvantage of the insulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

进行了一项实地研究,以评估马来西亚自然通风建筑物隔热屋顶和隔热天花板的效益。采用两个尺寸为4m × 4m × 3m的相同试验单元作为建筑样品。两个测试单元具有相同的设计,并采用传统的建筑围护结构。非绝缘的控制单元称为测试单元A (TCA),绝缘的测试单元称为测试单元B (TCB)。在屋面坡面和内顶棚处依次安装r值为2.22 (m2K/W)和2.88 (m2K/W)的导热保温材料。对于每种绝缘配置,使用自动数据记录设备同时监测两个测试单元的室外和室内环境数据。记录时间为顶棚保温5天,顶棚保温10天。本文介绍了对非绝缘测试单元A和绝缘测试单元b的热影响的研究结果,并通过各自的室内温度进行了评估。结果表明,俯仰保温和顶棚保温分别使室内白天温度降低了0.8°C和0.6°C。然而,两者在夜间都有不利影响。综上所述,沥青保温和吊顶保温都有利于减少白天的热影响。随着间距的增加,这种影响更为显著。由于标称温度差来确定热舒适条件的好处,冷负荷分析可以进一步证实隔热的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thermal performance of naturally ventilated test building with pitch and ceiling insulation
A field study was carried out to evaluate the benefits of insulated roof and insulated ceiling for naturally ventilated buildings in Malaysia. Two identical test cells with dimensions of 4m × 4m × 3m were used as building samples. Both test cells have identical design and were constructed with conventional building envelope. The non-insulated control unit is named as Test Cell A (TCA) while the insulated test unit is named as Test Cell B (TCB). Conductive thermal insulation of R-value 2.22 (m2K/W) and 2.88 (m2K/W) was consecutively installed at the roof pitch and internal ceiling respectively. For each insulation configuration, the outdoor and indoor environmental data for both test cells were concurrently monitored using automated data logging equipments. Data logging duration was five days for roof pitch insulation and ten days for ceiling insulation. This paper presents the findings on thermal impact on the non-insulated Test Cell A and insulated Test Cell B. These are appraised by the respective indoor temperature. The finding shows that pitch insulation and ceiling insulation lower the daytime indoor temperature up to 0.8°C and 0.6°C respectively. However, both have adverse impact at night. It is concluded that both pitch and ceiling insulations are beneficial to reduce the day-time thermal impact. The impact is more significant with the pitch insulation. Due to the nominal temperature differential to determine the benefits on the thermal comfort conditions, a cooling load analyses could further substantiate the advantage and disadvantage of the insulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Training transfer: Training characteristic, training design and work environment evaluation Carbon dioxide sequestration at elevated temperature by pressure swing adsorption Performance analysis of 45.36 kWp grid-connected photovoltaic systems at Malaysia Green Technology Corporation Multitrophic system: Effect of different concentration of nutrient and pre-infested brinjal (Solanum melongena) on whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) population Screw-fixing damages and screw-holding performance in particleboard exposed to the kitchen environment in the selected area of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1